Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 12:29 p.m. No.21876845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6859 >>6999 >>7387 >>7483 >>7539

Raskin and Marc Elias will deny PDJT as President unless Republicans are out numbering the Dems in the House. And also in the Senate.

 

Jeff Clark: "This Is A Dangerous Maneuver They Could Pull IF They Control The House"They are trying to negate the military overseas votes, and make up votes for Kamala, people who say they are citizens and are not.

 

We Must Win the House with a number more Republicans

 

Bannon’s WarRoom

@Bannons_WarRoom

 

@JeffClarkUS: "This Is A Dangerous Maneuver by Raskin, if They Could Pull, IF They Control The House"

 

9:06 The most important video to stop Raskin and others.

 

https://rumble.com/embed/v5irkgt/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 1:09 p.m. No.21877013   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7052 >>7387 >>7483 >>7539

Jeff Clark says yes the new Military Directive to use force on civilians in the US is real and is dangerous. He wrote this 18 page brief of what it means to the US and what could happen and what we have to do. First two pages of the document below. Document attached, dig in Anons

 

Directive 5240.01: A Threat to American Liberty By: Jeffrey Clark

 

Summary:The Pentagon adopted, just a month and a half ago, a new directive in the run-up to the 2024 presidential election thatauthorizes military-intelligence agents to use lethal force against the American people in connection with political unrestthat, in many instances, would be protected First Amendment activity.

 

Mainstream media and progressive media defending the Biden-Harris Administration have tried to waive away concerns about this new directive, which puts American civil liberties at grave risk (especially of the conservative/populist variety).The new directive does revise an older directive but, as explained below, the changes reduce protections for liberty and for activity designed to lead to political or policy change.

 

Additionally, drones can be used toexercise such force, as can secret contractors and security personnel, who may not even be aware they are acting under the direction of military authorities. Cover plans and obscured contracts can be used to augment military-intelligence assets.

 

Congressional oversight, stricter media scrutinyto bring these important matters to the attention of the American people, and Executive Branch reform depending on the outcome of the 2024 election are all justified here.

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.1

 

Introduction

One reason why the treaty power was granted to the President (subject to the check of the Senate to concur by a two-thirds majority of the Senators present) is intelligence-based. In other words, theFramers thought it essential that the President could make use of intelligence—i.e., of spying and related analysis—to negotiate and make such treaties. John Jay, perhaps the least known of the authors of the Federalist Papers, well knew this truth and he made it central to his defense of the Treaty Clause, U.S. Const., art. II, § 2, cl. 2, in Federalist 64.

 

In making it part of the defense of the Treaty Clause, Jay set forth a broader rationale for the use of intelligence gathering and spycraft tools. Jay’s theory was thatspying should be externally focused, so that it could help arrange foreign affairs to the exclusive benefit of the United States of America.

 

It seldom happens in the negotiation of treaties, of whatever nature, but that perfect SECRECY and immediate DESPATCH are sometimes requisite. …

 

The [constitutional] convention have done well, therefore, in so disposing of the power of making treaties, that although the President must, in forming them, act by the advice and consent of the Senate, yet he will be able to manage the business of intelligence in such a manner as prudence may suggest. …

 

But as to internal affairs, Jay does not emphasize that spying is required

 

With that background in Constitutional theory and its objectives concerning intelligence, it becomes clear the structural incentives implied by Pentagon Directive 5240.01, released just a few months ago, represent risks too great to be tolerated in a free society.To demonstrate that Pentagon Directive 5240.01 reflects dangerous innovations in the use of intelligence, turning the eyes and power of the state against American citizens at home, this paper is divided into the following sections:

 

Part Iexplains what Pentagon Directive 5240.01 (hereafter “The 2024 Directive”) provides and how it changed as against a prior version of the directive as issued in 2016. See DOD DIRECTIVE 5240.01: DOD Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities and Defense Intelligence Component Assistance to Law Enforcement Agencies and Other Civil Authorities (Sept. 27, 2024).

 

Part IIresponds to the attempts by the Pentagon and othersto defend The 2024 Directive as “no big deal,” as par for the course.

 

Part III explains how various parts of The 2024 Directive could be abusedand how it might essentially constitute “retconning” of activities that the intelligence community may have already made use of.

 

https://americarenewing.com/issues/directive-5240-01-a-threat-to-american-liberty/

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 1:18 p.m. No.21877052   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7387 >>7483 >>7539

>>21877013

 

From Clark's Brief on Directive 5240.01 page 3

 

PART I. WHAT THE 2024 DIRECTIVE DOES

Before looking at what The 2024 Directive does, it is important to establish the

baseline of what DOD Manual 5240.01 did (hereafter “The 2016 Manual Procedures”).3

 

==Chronologically, it should be noted that both versions (the 2016 and the 2024 versions)

of the relevant policies were established during Democrat Administrations==.

 

The 2016 Manual Procedures

The first thing to note about this document is that its title does not reference domestic law enforcement. Consistent with this, the very first page of The 2016 Manual Procedures explains that the purpose of these procedures is to guide “foreign intelligence and counterintelligence (CI) activities,” with deviations from that being the exception rather than the rule.4

 

In other words, The 2016 Manual Procedures are roughly consistent with Jay’s externally focused theory of intelligence gathering.

https://americarenewing.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Directive-5240.01_-A-Threat-to-American-Liberty-3.pdf

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 2 p.m. No.21877266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7313

Policy Issues / Woke and Weaponized

Authorizing the Military to use Lethal Force on America and Americans

Directive 5240.01: A Threat to American Liberty

Document Attached by Jeff Clark November 1, 2024

 

The Pentagon’s alarming Directive 5240.01 allows secret use of the military, turning intelligence inwards on the American People.

Summary: The Pentagon adopted, just a month and a half ago, a new directive in the run-up to the 2024 presidential electionthat authorizes military-intelligence agents to use lethal force against the American people in connection with political unrestthat, in many instances, would be protected First Amendment activity.

 

Mainstream media and progressive media defending the Biden-Harris Administrationhave tried to waive away concerns about this new directive, which puts American civil liberties at grave risk (especially of the conservative/populist variety). The new directive does revise an older directive but, as explained below,the changes reduce protections for liberty and for activity designed to lead to political or policy change.

 

Additionally, drones can be used to exercise such force, as can secret contractors and security personnel, who may not even be aware they are acting under the direction of military authorities. Cover plans and obscured contracts can be used to augment military-intelligence assets.

 

Congressional oversight, stricter media scrutiny to bring these important matters to the attention of the American people, and Executive Branch reform depending on the outcome of the 2024 election are all justified here. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.1

 

Introduction

One reason why the treaty power was granted to the President (subject to the check of the Senate to concur by a two-thirds majority of the Senators present) is intelligence-based. In other words, the Framers thought it essential that the President could make use of intelligence—i.e., of spying and related analysis—to negotiate and make such treaties. John Jay, perhaps the least known of the authors of the Federalist Papers, well knew this truth and he made it central to his defense of the Treaty Clause, U.S. Const., art. II, § 2, cl. 2, in Federalist 64.

In making it part of the defense of the Treaty Clause, Jay set forth a broader rationale for the use of intelligence gathering and spycraft tools. Jay’s theory was that spying should be externally focused, so that it could help arrange foreign affairs to the exclusive benefit of the United States of America….

With that background in Constitutional theory and its objectives concerning intelligence, it becomes clear the structural incentives implied by Pentagon Directive 5240.01, released just a few months ago, represent risks too great to be tolerated in a free society.To demonstrate that Pentagon Directive 5240.01 reflects dangerous innovations in the use of intelligence, turning the eyes and power of the state against American citizens at home, this paper is divided into the following sections:

 

Part I explains what Pentagon Directive 5240.01 (hereafter “The 2024 Directive”) provides and how it changed as against a prior version of the directive as issued in 2016. See DOD DIRECTIVE 5240.01: DOD Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities and Defense Intelligence Component Assistance to Law Enforcement Agencies and Other Civil Authorities (Sept. 27, 2024).

 

Part II responds to the attempts by the Pentagon and others to defend The 2024 Directive as “no big deal,” as par for the course.

 

Part III explains how various parts ofThe 2024 Directive could be abused and how it might essentially constitute “retconning” of activities that the intelligence community may have already made use of.

 

PART I. WHAT THE 2024 DIRECTIVE DOES

Before looking at what The 2024 Directive does, it is important to establish the baseline of what DOD Manual 5240.01 did (hereafter “The 2016 Manual Procedures”).3 Chronologically, it should be noted that both versions (the 2016 and the 2024 versions) of the relevant policies were established during Democrat Administrations….

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 2:16 p.m. No.21877397   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7483 >>7505 >>7539

Michael Pruser

@MichaelPruser

 

Arizona frequency was updated today courtesy of

@jrodplumb

.

Republicans now have a ~180,000 ballot advantage heading into the weekend and should end up with over 200,000 before election day.

 

Even though they've made an effort to GOTV early, many registered Republicans not on the absentee mail list are still waiting to vote in person on Election Day.

 

They continue to outpace Democrats in daily margins in all four buckets and might catch Democrats in the 3/3 share when all the votes have been counted.

 

67% of the expected vote is recorded in Arizona.

 

AZ Sheet - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FZo8siU1Q7WtQ82nphzSve5lShXR4YjfdX7NlO_vQRc/edit?gid=914039711#gid=914039711

4:12 PM · Nov 1, 2024

·32.9K Views

 

https://x.com/MichaelPruser/status/1852443515235832102

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 2:21 p.m. No.21877427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7473 >>7483 >>7539

Joe Concha

@JoeConchaTV

 

NV early voting ends today. Trump up +5.1 in early voting in NV, per Ralston, and it's considered the bluest of the 7 battleground states.

 

Trump will lead in NC, GA, AZ and NV going into election day – when GOP voting will only accelerate.

 

Kamala's only path will be WI, MI, PA. And even if she wins those, there's the wild card of Trump taking another state like NH, VA, NM - thereby rendering the Blue Wall mute regardless.

 

Quote

Jon Ralston

@RalstonReports

·

17h

Nevada voter update:

 

GOP+47K now, 5.1 percent.

 

Blog update coming.

6:11 AM · Nov 1, 2024

·117.6K Views

 

https://x.com/JoeConchaTV/status/1852292488767193321

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 2:24 p.m. No.21877458   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7483 >>7539

NEWSMAX

@NEWSMAX

 

"So many people are voting early in Nevada, they ran out of paper."

 

@CarlHigbie shares his enthusiasm for people going out to vote.

 

8:46 PM · Oct 31, 2024

·76.1K Views

https://x.com/NEWSMAX/status/1852150145309184428

Anonymous ID: 55dc12 Nov. 1, 2024, 2:28 p.m. No.21877503   🗄️.is 🔗kun

@Chicago1Ray

@Chicago1Ray

 

Democrats were counting on Nevada, polls show Latinos are breaking hard for Trump, showing him up 3 points, that's big Trumps not taking his foot off the gas with (5) days left to go, it's full speed ahead, no letting up Trump Rally, Henderson, NV

 

1:23

10:23 PM · Oct 31, 2024

·61.1K Views

https://x.com/Chicago1Ray/status/1852174627482534080