make a new kind of money
that people get one unit of per election office.
you 'deposit' your money into the 'bank' of one candidate for each office on the ballot.
and then you let the banking software tell you who has the most money.
the one with the most of that 'coin' will win.
the software already exists: it's called 'banking'.
why they dont' use this, like what utilities do to know that you owe them a dime . . . why?
because they don't want secure elections.
>(You)
my point is that if you owe money to a bank or utility they know exactly how much and they never lose track. Use the same kind of system with elections and they will be fair and honest.
I'm not getting your correlation between my post and that other one. please explain it to me.
the picrel is about you, slander shill
they seem to know that california elections are compromised, anon. you do know this, right?