Anonymous ID: 33a1bd Jan. 30, 2018, 8:41 p.m. No.219585   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>218533

So, just to clarify, then, should this post from CBTS be marked as bad, too?

https:// 8ch.net/cbts/res/252113.html#252698

 

It's been a busy week. I spent quite a bit of time tracking down missing images for Q posts and posts that are context for Q posts. I am happy to say that I was able to find just about all of them in thumbnail form, and I was also able to find the full size ones where it was important to have them. The 8ch Q posts will be going up on my blog very soon. (I keep saying that, but this time it should happen.) I still don't have questions properly linked in. Like I said, stuff broke when we started board hopping. That's the next phase of getting stuff up on the blog. At some point, I need to get more of the timeline stuff up, too. I've been doing a lot of work on my toolset. I'm going to start doing some extensive tagging. That's where the real magic of my plan for the site comes in. There are more than half a million posts in the set since the initial Q drop at the end of October, so this is no small feat!

Anonymous ID: 33a1bd Jan. 30, 2018, 8:50 p.m. No.219683   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>219653

>Scarey thing is, you have to ask yourself, "why do they need to do it at all?"

It would be even scarier if they didn't do what they're doing. It's becoming clear to those dedicated to this work that the conspiracy theories about what was planned for us are true.

Anonymous ID: 33a1bd Jan. 30, 2018, 8:53 p.m. No.219717   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9749

>>219688

I can think of one I'd like to see kicked to the curb. We've got a postal carrier who marks things as delivered before he leaves the post office. We've been complaining about that one for a while.