>>21928546 get a grip.
Grenwald is being humorous as if what DiNero says is true, but it isn't.
I sometimes use I.
that's not a big deal.
and if I use 'we' it's describing a general effect, not a required activity or obligation.
what it really comes down to: no one speaks for the board, or all the anon, in a general way as obligations of thought or behavior.
in the case of BV and BO, and Jim, (administrator) they could be speaking for the requirements of the board but again they aren't perscribing thoughts or behavior.
they will say when people cross the line and BV will delete (lately a lot gets deleted).
so a 'we' is OK if it's a limited we like "I went with my friend to the mall. We had coffee"
everyone knows that I'm not directing behavior.
how does a cabal woman get to be a ruler?
seems pretty obvious if you read about the Mexican election and what happened to the other candidates.