>>2192793 (lb)
Cool, you got a (you) from Q. But I've noticed Q doesn't always address the most insightful posts or interesting questions, just posts that seem to agree with the plan of generally waiting it out to no end. Any rationale toward that end is welcomed, it seems.
In regard to your Q (you) post, there likely won't be any indictment unsealed against Awan since he was given immunity through the plea deal. So, the state charges ruse was a means to no payoff. Further, what motivation does Awan have for being a strong witness? DOJ should have had Awan testify against the others first, then offered him a plea deal with reduced charges or sentence recommendation. He's getting 6 months in prison and a full bank account waiting for him in Pakistan.