Minorities came through for Trump, but the key to winning them over wasn’t typical Dem-style pandering…

November 7, 2024 (2 hours ago)1/2

Hispanic American patriots who showed up for President Trump in droves on Tuesday. Minorities across the board turned out for Trump in historic numbers—and not because of the usual empty, pandering tactics we see from the Dems.

They showed up because, for the first time, a politician treated them like the smart, savvy, and deeply concerned Americans they are.President Trump offered strength, and he offered real solutions, not a laundry list of useless freebies and phony celebrity appearancesdesigned to keep them quiet and “entertained” until the next election.

And that’s why so many Hispanics voted for him, and also why so many blacks flipped and voted for President Trump as well.

Al Jazeera:

Harris was expected to reverse a troubling trend for Democrats and win back Black voters, who had been drifting away from the party. Since then, her campaign has targeted Black voters in battleground states, often with the support of the country’s first Black president, Barack Obama.

Yet as results in Tuesday’s election trickled in, a stunning fact emerged: It is Trump, not Harris, who gained support among Black voters compared with the 2020 election, as the former president won the White House.

[…]

Harris appears to have won 80 percent of the Black vote, according to an exit poll by The Associated Press. Butthat’s a drop of 10 percentage pointscompared with 2020 when the current president, Joe Biden, won nine of 10 Black votes.

The beneficiary? Trump, who won 20 percent of the Black vote this time, according to the exit poll. He had won 13 percent of the community’s vote in 2020 and 8 percent in 2016 — which in itself was the highest level of support by Black voters for any Republican since George W Bush in 2000.

In fact, President Trump won historically black counties for the first time since 2004.The same sort of thing happened all over the country. Just look at this county in North Carolina:

President Trump won the Arab stronghold of Dearborn, Michigan, after losing it by an astonishing 77 points the last time around.

Hispanics and blacks in the Bronx helped shift that county 21 points to the right.

The list goes on and on. Trump’s message of stopping mass immigration, stopping crime, making peace, lower prices, better jobs, fewer taxes, and affordable groceries resonated with these folks. They don’t care if you eat hot sauce or put on a phony “urban” accent—they want real results, just like every other American.

https://revolver.news/2024/11/minorities-came-through-for-trump-key-to-winning-them-over-was-not-typical-dem-style-pandering/

>>21935869

2/3

And who can forget when, in a fit of absolute desperation, Kamala promised male voters porn, video games, and weed?It’s just insulting beyond words. In the end, only one candidate offered them tangible, real solutions, and he won. BIG.

Blacks and Hispanics remember how much better life was just four short years ago. Why wouldn’t they want that back?

And right on cue, just as Lindsey pointed out above, the left has learned absolutely nothing. Instead of taking a hard look in the mirror and analyzing their own glaring failures, they’re doing what they do best: blaming everyone else for their epic failures.

Once again, the so-called “tolerant” and “loving” left-wing propaganda machine wasted no time attacking decent, hard-working people for daring to do the unthinkable—walking off the progressive plantation to improve their own lives.

However, it wasn’t just red state Hispanics.

The blue state Hispanics also came through:How dare they put themselves first! Don’t these silly minorities know this isn’t about them? It’s about keeping the political elites comfortable and well-funded—because someone has to pay for that second infinity pool.

According to the left, Hispanics didn’t vote for their futures or their families. Nope—they’re just “woman-haters.” Yeah, that’s the ticket.

Andif they’re not “woman-haters,” the left claims they only voted for Trump because they want to be “white.” That’s right, folks—apparently, you can’t be Hispanic and vote for a better life. The “tolerant” left just won’t allow it.

This is the same tired, pathetic coping session we hear after every single loss. No self-reflection, no accountability, no shame—just excuses that divide and create more hate and lies.

But fear not, because there’s a lot of good news in all of this, folks:President Trump won the largest share of Hispanic votes of any Republican in US history—all while standing firm on deporting illegals.

Now tell us, if that’s not a huge “white pill,” what is?

https://revolver.news/2024/11/minorities-came-through-for-trump-key-to-winning-them-over-was-not-typical-dem-style-pandering/

November 3, 2024

What’s up doc? Your favorite childhood cartoon was way darker than you realized1/2(Excellent Article with links to all the videos)

Remember settling in, snack in hand, to watch the iconic Looney Tunes? Ah, the nostalgia—a simple time when Bugs Bunny was just a wisecracking rabbit, Daffy Duck a chaotic, slobbering sidekick, and the world seemed so much less complicated. But was it really as innocent as we thought it was? Beneath the slapstick and outlandish chases, many believe these cartoons were actually hiding something much darker. Turns out, Looney Tunes may have been crafted for adult minds, layered with subtle themes, surreal humor, and sometimes sinister subtext.

From the wild escapades to the endless violence, these seemingly innocent cartoons carry fan theories that suggest hidden worlds of political satire, wartime trauma, and biting social commentary. So, why did these cartoons resonate with adults just as much, if not more, than with kids? Could there have been a deeper purpose, or were these creators simply slipping in something subversive under our childhood radar? Let’s step back and look again, through the lens of fan theories that give Bugs Bunny, Daffy, and Porky Pig a whole new, possibly darker, dimension.

At their core, Looney Tunes cartoons were a reflection of the times—coming to life during an era marked by World War II, social tensions, and shifting American values. They weren’t just animated fun for kids; they were a clever vehicle for satire, criticism, and dark humor that were all about adult anxieties.

Inside The Magic: From political commentary to mustering morale, the animation industry grew during the Second World War. During a time when almost every industry was tasked with supporting the war effort to stop the Axis powers from dominating the planet, cartoons went from entertaining the young to educating adults.In this three-part series; Inside the Magic takes a look back at some of these works of art and the artists who created them during this Golden Age of Animation. In part two we take a look into the Warner Brothers Studio’s role in these wartime films.

Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck and the Merrie Melodies/Loony Tunes gang joined in the parade with clips ranging from ridiculing the enemy with satire and absurd (some might say offensive) illustrations of Axis leaders and citizens to depicting key characters antagonizing and overcoming the enemy. Merrie Melodies was the Looney Tunes answer to Walt Disney’s Silly Symphonies and featured music from other Warner Brothers films.

In November of 1943, Daffy Duck matched wits with the Third Reich in “Daffy the Commando” which was directed by Friz Freleng, written by Michael Maltese and animated by Ken Champin. Audio credit goes to Carl Stalling for music and Mel Blanc for voices. The subtle humor in this Looney Tunes feature is well crafted. One scene shows a telegraph from “the Apes of Wrath” and includes all three Axis leaders (except Mossolini crossed out).

But there were so many more examples of this type of political propaganda in Looney Tunes cartoons. Take the “Russian Rhapsody” cartoon from 1944. It featured Gremlins attacking Hitler’s plane: wartime satire designed to mock the enemy. It was subtle enough for kids, but unmistakably meant for the adults.

And if you need an even bigger more in your face nod to adult content, look at Daffy Duck’s infamous “Daffy the Commando” from 1943. In that cartoon, Daffy is a fire fighter fighting against the Nazis. The cartoon includes slapstick, sure, but it’s woven with dark humor that reflects wartime tensions and digs at authoritarian regimes.

https://wickedlynews.com/whats-up-doc-your-favorite-childhood-cartoon-was-way-darker-than-you-realized/

Daffy “The Commando”:(1943) WWII Era Propaganda Cartoon, Daffy Duck matched wits with the Third Reich in “Daffy the Commando”

https://youtu.be/qy_MQkaJ5WE

Gremlins from the Kremlin 1944

https://youtu.be/beVgHSO4Ewg

Daffy Duck vs Hitler: The Commando 1949 Loony Tunes Short

https://youtu.be/0R6wtWUEK18

>>21936118

2/2

And no matter what how he’s drawn, Bugs Bunny was never meant to be an innocent hare. In the fan theory known as the “Anarchist Bugs” interpretation, Bugs represents a fearless, unapologetic rebel who challenges authority at every turn. It’s easy to see him as just mischievous, but the theory suggests he’s a symbol of resistance and individuality, embodying the era’s growing distrust of rigid authority. “Rebel Rabbit” from 1949 has Bugs on an anti-establishment chaos spree, where he’s pulling off absurd pranks and full-blown civil disobedience. Was he meant to show kids the value of individuality, or was he winking at adults as a reminder of their right to question authority and the government?

But it wasn’t all wartime jabs and political digs. The creators snuck in plenty of social commentary and, yep, straight-up adult humor, too—those sly winks designed just for the parents in the room.

One of the biggest “social misfit” characters was Wile E. Coyote and his nemesis the Road Runner—a pair of rivals so iconic their roles almost speak to the concept of existential absurdity. Wile E.’s constant failures and his obsession with capturing the Road Runner reveal a character so tortured that he may even represent the absurdity of human ambition and failure. Some theories argue that Wile E. Coyote symbolizes society’s pursuit of success, a chase that often ends in cartoonish humiliation rather than triumph. Could this be a reminder of the pitfalls of relentless ambition?

Check out “To Beep or Not to Beep” from 1963, where Coyote’s repeated failures start to feel almost tragic—a darkly humorous take on futility that adults might recognize in their own day to day challenges.

Many fans have pointed out the surreal and often unsettling atmosphere in certain Porky Pig cartoons, especially “Porky in Wackyland” from 1938. Here, Porky chases the elusive Dodo into a surreal, and totally bizarre landscape filled with nonsensical and nightmarish imagery. This cartoon has sparked theories that it reflects the dreamlike horrors of the subconscious. Some interpret this as a look at the chaotic, irrational side of the human psyche—a glimpse into the nightmares that adults might have while pretending life is simple and lovely. “Wackyland” blurs the lines between humor and horror, creating a space that’s dark, strange, and wildly unpredictable, and probably not all that great for kids.

Daffy Duck continues to prove he was definitely more than just a zany sidekick; he embodied a darker existential struggle, especially in cartoons like “Duck Amuck” from 1953. In this classic, Daffy Duck’s entire reality becomes a surreal battleground as an unseen animator warps his world—and his identity—without warning. Imagine the frustration:Daffy is drawn, erased, twisted, and redrawn into absurd shapes, leaving him desperate for some form of control. It’s almost like an existential nightmare, but for adults watching, it’s more than slapstick.Daffy’s chaotic struggle to define himself in an unpredictable universe resonates as a wry reflection on our own craving for stability in a world that just won’t quit changing the rules.

So, why were these Looney Tunes cartoons packed with dark undertones, satirical nods, and subtle messages that could fly over children’s heads? Perhaps the creators understood that their work would live on in the minds of adults just as much as in the imaginations of kids.

Looney Tunes was loaded with “for-the-grown-ups” humor, cleverly slipped in between the slapstick for kids. From sly cultural references to sharp-tongued banter, the creators knew how to keep parents tuned in, too.

Cartoonists like Tex Avery and Chuck Jones were masters of the wink-and-nod style—adding in quick, edgy jokes or double entendres that went over kids’ heads but hit adults just right. Whether it was savvy marketing or just a love of layered storytelling, it ensured Looney Tunes stayed on TV (and in the living room) longer, appealing across generations.

These theories reveal that maybe, just maybe, our Saturday morning childhoods weren’t as innocent as we thought—and that’s part of the magic. Whether these messages were accidental or intentional, they reflect a layered storytelling style that entertains but also challenges. After all, isn’t it far more thrilling to realize that Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and their friends had far more to say than “What’s up, Doc?”

https://wickedlynews.com/whats-up-doc-your-favorite-childhood-cartoon-was-way-darker-than-you-realized/

Rebel Rabbit 1949 (Opening and Closing)

https://youtu.be/asrWsc7VNvs

Top Ten Things Only Adults Notice in Loony Tunes

https://youtu.be/f6fbYJRsaVA

Wile Coyote and The Road Runner: “To Beep or Not to Beep” 1963

https://youtu.be/3pij7FgSxVY

Loony Tunes: Porky in Wackyland, Wackyland Sunrise

https://youtu.be/xrsFGe05HPs

Duck Amok 1938 Opening:

https://youtu.be/2F2kRIMNlM0

>>21936118

What's sickening today is children are still exposed to this evil crap. I hope someone actually brings a plan to PDJT of how to get rid of this company or stop the mind control of the entire public.>>21936118

>>21936171

Whatever happened it surprised me it was called so fast, and I doubt the RNC is that organized to catch all of this, legal matters are their things, probably not tech tracking of black hats. Lara only had 7 months to get up to speed, and that place is so fucking corrupt they will be finding it for years, just like the DNC

>>21936204

>>21936204

OK I know there is this ongoing White Hat/Black Hat discussion on Flynn.

From my personal impression, I would not necessarily follow Flynn; he just wouldn’t be a person that I'd followed. Mostly because I’ve considered him a terrible speaker that led me to believe he’s not that brilliant, except in war. Even Sundance negated him from his list of people he'd want in PDJT Admin. I have been impressed with Sundance’s analysis and some times mine is similar. He said the following in his article on Flynn.

1. “Former Nat Sec Advisor Michael Flynn disqualified himself from further consideration by poor judgement.

2. Don’t forget, Flynn was an agent for a foreign government (Turkey 2016) and never told candidate Trump, thereby setting the Trump administration up for compromise.

3. Flynn then claims he didn’t see the risk of an FBI interview in his office and never told the White House Counsel of his intent to be interviewed by the FBI.

4.You cannot claim Flynn is smart and reconcile that with his stupidity.”

5.Lastly, Mike Flynn is a deeply connected friend and associate to General Stanley McChrystal. I will say no more.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/06/suggestions-for-president-donald-trump-staffing-of-key-positions-2025/

Everyone should read this super long article, very thoughtful and interesting, Trump’s choices are usually not the ones in the spot light with PDJT but the ones behind the scenes, and are not worshipped.