>>2193672 (pb)
for one "cleaning it" is going to be getting rid of RR.. It's a process. DOJ is clean because of Sessions. RR is the second fiddle.
FBI has WRAY. Remember "Trust Wray" FBI is clean now too.
If you carefully listened to President Trump at the Summit you would hear that he said "his people" They are now "his people" So he trusts them. He wasn't speaking of Brennan, as in "Trust Brennan" Brennan now works for CNN
>>2193773
Maybe. But the Mueller indictment pointed to Russians and the indictment was written by George Webb regarding AWAN. Mueller changed the word "Awan" to "Russia" !
It was layered apparently . The "Russians" aren't working for Russia, per Putin.
Anyway,. I'm not going to jump ahead of myself. A lot will change once the documents of the OIG are unredacted, and then unclassified [or in the other order; unclassified then unredacted?]. Yes, then everybody gets dragged in to testify? Including the Russians who can point the finger at Awan / Wasserman, etc.,?
That's not what he modified.
Claim was that the release of the Clinton emails lost the election for her; and the "Russians" did that, in collusion with Trump.
Yet, what was it on those emails that would cause her to lose? They still haven't located the server[s]?
First they told the public the emails didn't' exist , then they were stolen property and it was illegal to look at them.
Maybe if the documents showed she was into weird shit it was good the "leak" lost the election for her?
What did Trump have to do with the leak? Nothing. They created the "Russia" BS just as they realized they had lost control of some of their data [hacked?] Or was it just compromised?
The claim the emails were private property is a lie, since she used a private server while serving as Secretary of State, which is illegal. They are public property.
Is the "Pay for Play" supposed to have "National Security" protection? Does she own us?
Could be like a "Leaven" It's for the Plan to get ripe. Like bread, salted and soured, and left to sit to Rise. -23 ,, is some kind of count-down
How long will it take? Dunno. Havne't had the time to struggle with it.
Seems to me the moment would be hidden on purpose and only clear [-23] in retrospect?
Should be NOTABLE,. Reminds me of VOAT here. Unless it's in the NYTimes or CNN it's not notable.