>>21940577

This matches up with my leading hypothesis. Agreed.

>>21940585

Haha gotcha.

>>21940588

I am of the opinion that he is instrumental to the operation.

>>21940591

I’ve gone back and forth on this. For a while I thought we were witnessing something akin to Marathon (bungie game), but now I’m leaning more toward a human-led initiative with tech assisting.

>>21940597

I can understand why you’d think that, but no, just an independent researcher in a weird spot trying to fill some gaps.

>>21940570

Theatrical cartoons were meant for all ages, and some like Private SNAFU were meant for adult audiences only.

>>21940611

Thanks for responding.

>>21940644

10-4, thanks.

>>21940661

Most of these people are harmless victims of intense psychological conditioning. Forgive them. Most will fall in line when justice comes, and they will need forgiveness to free them from their embarrassment.

>>21940674

I think the correct apportionment of justice and mercy will be our final burden. Those people will have it worse, knowing they were duped and actively assisting evil, but anons will carry the burden of forgiveness rather than total revenge.

“Success will bring us together”

>>21940675

I’m of the personal belief that no (sane) human is immune to psyops. We are being directed as well, just in a positive direction. For the sake of the future I think we’ll be led to help them overcome the embarrassment and move on.

>>21940676

Me too.

>>21940692

I expect to be surprised in the end.

>>21940693

Thanks for responding. My guess is a little more shock than subtlety, but still avoiding conflict.

>>21940700

Fine way of putting it, sure.

>>21940708

>>21940712

My assumption on the mercy vs justice question comes from profiling Q team and looking at previous moments in history with big change. Reconstruction. Japan after WWII. Hitler’s unification of Germany after the embarrassment of Weimar.

My hard guess is we’re not in the “gas all the libtards” timeline, so, what is to be done? We’ll see.

>>21940736

I actually agree.

First they will be embarrassed.

Then they will be the ones cheering hardest at the gallows.

>>21940741

I don’t think we’re saying much differently. We’re just focusing on different aspects. The level of existential embarrassment will be PROFOUND, but, it will have to end to have a future. Using your analogy, we will come out the other side on the same team (soldiers), at least, those that are capable of reform.

>>21940786

Yep

>>21940770

I held off on the doubles theory for as long as I could, but that sentiment has started to crack.

Regardless, my guess is we are in the phase where most of “them” are negotiating the terms of their surrender.

The relative calm after the election is what prompted the question in the first place. Gunshy for a final cornered-animal attack, unsure if it’s coming.

>>21940777

Yep

>>21940784

I lean on him not being one, but possible.

>>21940792

Pretty much how I see it. Super quiet invisible victory would subjectively be lame, but I also think people need justice more than they need innocence in the wake of this.

>>21940795

None. I’m just on a less structured path of research.

Thanks again for your thoughts everyone.

>>21940832

There will be some labor pains as we’re reborn into the next era, for sure. I focused on the need for mercy because it’s the less popular of the two, but there will be a serious need for justice. And then after justice, purpose and vision. Years ago before Q, I foresaw a civil war as our unavoidable destiny. I think this operation, most of all, was providing a better alternative to that.

Thank you for the kind words, and good faith discussion. If my main theory is correct, expect a historic market crash between now and inauguration day. This is not financial advice.