dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: 32fc18 Nov. 8, 2024, 1:03 p.m. No.21944872 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>4881 >>4884 >>4888 >>5060 >>5155 >>5270 >>5439 >>5501

Senate Republicans Mounted an Effort To Threaten Qatar To Expel Hamas Leaders.

After Trump's Win, an Israeli News Report Suggests It May Have Worked.

https://freebeacon.com/israel/senate-republicans-mounted-an-effort-to-threaten-qatar-to-expel-hamas-leaders-after-trumps-win-an-israeli-news-report-suggests-it-may-have-worked/

Adam Kredo

SCOOP: Senate Republicans Mounted an Effort To Punish Qatar For Sheltering Hamas. After Trump's Win, Reports Now Suggests It May Have Worked – Doha will be forced to expel Hamas as GOP pressure increases after a year of Biden-Harris appeasement

>>21944872

>Senate Republicans Mounted an Effort To Threaten Qatar To Expel Hamas Leaders.

1:53 PM · Nov 8, 2024·24.2K Views

https://x.com/Kredo0/status/1854960376711962700

Dinesh D’Souza Podcast

WHAT’S THIS

In this episode, Dinesh and Debbie talk about their bet over the election results, the issue of the “missing” 20 million ballots, what happens to the credibility of the mainstream media, and whether we still have to worry about Texas someday going blue.

50 minutes ago 49:43

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i36YCq0pYyU

>>21944785

Don't think he needed much of an App. Just needed to see that the actual votes being reported were in-line with Rasmussen Reports, data had shown. Anyone could tell, earlie on, that Trump would win.

>>21945039

>actual votes being reported were in-line with Rasmussen Reports

Rasmussen Reports Completely Vindicated by 2024 Election Results

During this election, many of us on both sides were obsessed with polls, betting markets, rally sizes, and any sort of tea leaves we could read to gauge where this election stood. In my extensive coverage of the polls this year, one thing that stood out was how the left refused to accept the results of polling that didn't tell them what they wanted to hear. This happens on both sides, but from what I could see, if people on the right thought a poll was suspicious, they would look at the crosstabs and tell you why it was wrong.

If people on the left didn't like the topline results, however, they would accuse the pollster of bias and call it a day. One outfit in particular that endured a lot of criticism from the left was Rasmussen Reports. In fact, they were removed from both FiveThirtyEight and Nate Silver's election models for being a "partisan" pollster.

The day after Trump won, I spoke with Mark Mitchell, the head pollster at Rasmussen Reports, about the election results and how vindicated he feels in light of them. …

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/11/08/rasmussen-reports-completely-vindicated-by-2024-election-results-n4934072

>>21945039

thread

Rasmussen Reports

"What a pack of lying scumbags the entire industry is," (Mitchell) said. "I got a lot of flack for saying that this was gonna be 1980s-style landslide. And I think it was a landslide, but as I said, Trump’s not gonna get as much as Reagan because there was a third-party spoiler, but the parallels are that back then, all the pollsters were lying. They were saying that the race was too close to call. This race was never too close to call according to my numbers, and they just ignored them."

"Rasmussen's final national poll had Trump +3 over Kamala, which was spot-on accurate. Their state polling was also remarkably on target, compared to their competitors. Rasmussen correctly called the winner in 93% of these states and stayed within the margin of error 79% of the time, demonstrating reliable precision. The average polling error was just -0.7 points, meaning their predictions were very close to the actual results overall. While there were some larger discrepancies in states like Texas and Nevada, Rasmussen’s polling was otherwise consistently on target, especially in high profile states like Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona."

"Mitchell addressed criticism from Nate Silver, who “downranked us as Republican pollsters,” despite Rasmussen not showing statistical bias. He discussed a controversy where leaked emails showed that Rasmussen had shared unreleased poll results with the Trump campaign, noting that Rasmussen shares unreleased polling with many people and even has a subscription service for it."

"He highlighted the irony of Ann Seltzer, a respected pollster, releasing two conflicting polls: one showing Trump up by 18 and another with Harris up by 3. According to Mitchell, the Harris +3 poll was “communicated early to Democrat circles,” and they were “ecstatic and laughing and because they really needed hope, and they got a gold standard pollster handing them exactly the copium they needed.”"

"He suggested Seltzer’s move was an attempt to help Democrats maintain morale, even if it compromised her credibility, adding that her past polls showing Trump up double digits in Iowa reflected the reality. “So what was funny is she destroyed her credibility to help stop Trump, and she was actually a damn good pollster.”"

>>21945129

>https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/11/08/rasmussen-reports-completely-vindicated-by-2024-election-results-n4934072

4:33 PM · Nov 8, 2024

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1855000823614308528

to

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1855000831462195497