I truly wonder if these are anons that think naked females counts as "encouragement" or just bots wanting to shit up the bread ASAP.
Don't want to drag this into a whole debate but for the latter - we're on the INTERNET, if bakers wants to see tits then he can see tits. Your thanks or you stepping up to bake is more than enough.
Yeah right - I'm "afraid" of pictures of naked women and I'm a shill because I don't want porn on a board reserved for research. Christ.
Funny because the first article I can find about this shows both sides decrying the porn being broadcast as damaging.
Posting porn isn't MUH CULTURE you fucking mongoloid, the culture is MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, IT'S DIGGING AND EXPOSING CRIMINALS.
Just because this is a chan board doesn't mean it's halfchan. Absolutely ludicrous.
By all means, keep posting porn if you honestly think it's "encouragement" and not just annoying as fuck, it's on you if you damage the movement, not me.
Yeah, I'M the one who's lost because I don't want porn posted.
YOU'RE the one who's a true Q patriot because you're posting disgusting shit.
Mental illness at its best.
Do you really think I give a fuck if I'm "outnumbered?" Doesn't make me feel special, just makes me feel disappointed in anons, if they're really anons.
Thank you.
Funny, if it's not about porn then why do people post porn?
I'M dumbing down the board, not the people posting porn - just examine this logic and decide for yourself, real anons.
Just look at how angry and defensive this poster gets just because I simply propose the idea porn can be used as a slide-tactic, which is exactly what happened to halfchan. You ooze insecurity.
You're also assuming Q doesn't have an issue with it, I choose to assume Q puts up with it, like everyone else who doesn't want to see that shit.
I understand and have been putting up with it - just curious if there are legitimate anons that think the porn is somehow "encouragement."
I get anons posting trad-wives, conservative hotties, whatever, not an issue with me - this shit isn't it and it's always RIGHT AT THE START OF THE BREAD.
Or, like I said, it's a shill tactic used to slide and psychologically fuck with anons.
So what, it's now board consensus porn = shills? So any real anon should resist from posting straight up porn, right? This is a forum that can agree to terms among its members, right?
And I don't think you know what virtue-signaling means - I originally tried to determine if porn-posters were real anons or shills, and if they were real anons, then they should reconsider posting straight up porn, which there are several of.
And sorry that I can't extract the tiny last bits of info from Q drops and am trying to gain a better understanding of the board (first part was not sarcasm).