Anonymous ID: fddad7 Nov. 10, 2024, 4:13 a.m. No.21955908   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6002 >>6186 >>6278 >>6283 >>6500 >>6611

>>21955829 lb

 

REPORT: @KamalaHarris

Campaign PAID Oprah Winfrey $1,000,000 To Do The Interview With Her!

They Presented It As A Journalistic Endeavor…

THAT WAS A LIE!

HARRIS DID NOT PRESENT IT AS A PAID POLITICAL AD, WHICH IT WAS, A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW!

 

10:23 AM · Nov 9, 2024

·

31.8K

Views

 

https://x.com/JohnBasham/status/1855270075642654746

Anonymous ID: fddad7 Nov. 10, 2024, 4:18 a.m. No.21955919   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6186 >>6278 >>6283 >>6500 >>6611

A federal jury in Detroit awarded more than $12 million Friday to a former Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) employee who was terminated after declining to get a COVID-19 vaccination, citing religious discrimination.

According to the verdict form, Lisa Domski, who worked at the insurance company for more than 30 years as an IT specialist, received $10 million in punitive damages against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. The jury also awarded her approximately $1.7 million in lost wages and $1 million in noneconomic damages.

Newsweek contacted Blue Cross Blue Shield via email on Saturday for comment.

Domski claimed she was a victim of religious discrimination after the company denied her request for an exemption from its 2021 vaccine policy. She maintained that the requirement conflicted with her Catholic beliefs.

Court records show Domski worked 100% remotely during the pandemic and 75% remotely before COVID-19 emerged in 2020. Her attorney, Jon Marko, argued that even without vaccination, she posed no risk to others due to her remote work arrangement.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/woman-fired-refusing-covid-vaccine-wins-record-millions-1983294

Anonymous ID: fddad7 Nov. 10, 2024, 5:12 a.m. No.21956028   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21956002

oprah pocketing millions while pretending to be doing a public service by interviewing knee pads

jimmy crying like a little bitch knowing what is coming

aggravating circumstances vs mitigating circumstances at their upcoming sentencings?