>>2195912 lb
Don't know the guy's name, but almost positive he spoke at a press conference at the white house very early in Trump's administration. Didn't look too comfortable doing it, almost like he wasn't used to it.
>>2195912 lb
Don't know the guy's name, but almost positive he spoke at a press conference at the white house very early in Trump's administration. Didn't look too comfortable doing it, almost like he wasn't used to it.
Anons, anyone stop to think that Putin, who has kids, thought "Hey, maybe Trump's boy would like a soccer ball from the World Cup"? Hence, why Trump threw it to Melania, and told her to make sure it got to Baron?
Sounds like dad behavior to me.
Anons, "transfer speed" is a red herring. As I understand it, the DNC e-mail server was an Exchange server. If that is incorrect, everything that follows can be ignored.
Any of you faggots ever copy an Exhange database, or export it? It's not too difficult, but the information store is huge. An e-mail that is sent to 5 recipients isn't stored once, with 4 pointers to it, like old e-mail systems did. It is stored 5 times. Microsoft made that change with Exchange 2010, iirc. Additionally, If you want a valid copy, you have to include the sql transactional logs. Which brings up a whole other can of worms, but I won't get into that.
Now, unless their is specialized security software running on that server, which I doubt, there wouldn't be logs showing who was doing what. Know why? The logs take up too Damn much room! I've had to clean up Exchange servers that have filled up with Exchange and MS logs, and it's not fun. Granted, the last 2 versions won't send/receive e-mail when the drive it is stored on gets too full.
Unless running in a secured environment which requires auditing, no sane administrator is going to set up audit logging. And if they did, it sure as fuck wouldn't be on the same server.
Copying an Exchange database isn't just copying a single file. It's a bit more complicated than that. I can think of about 4 or 5 different ways to do it, but understand this: Unless Seth Rich was an IT guy who knew Microsoft Server and or Exchange, HE HAD HELP.
One more thing. To avoid having significant down time, there are only 2 or 3 ways to do it. I can guaranfuckingtee you, the second an e-mail server goes down, no matter how short, the network admin gets a call.
If Awan was the IT guy, he KNEW that server went down. Who ran interference with him?
I do not know why I didn't see this before.
Yep. Someone knew that server was down. The admin of that server didn't check it out and find Seth fucking with it. The question is: why? Assuming the Seth Rich theory is true.
What I wouldn't give to be a congress critter questioning the FBI about this! Kek.
>>First, unless you pay MS millions upon millions of dollars, they aren't going to license you the source code to either product. Thus you can't "inject" anything into the source code.
Second, it's been a while, but the screenshots you included look like a Directory services trace than anything else.
I don't give a flying rat's mass who had admin passwords. Not the point. Point is, SR couldn't have done it, unless he had extensive server and or Exchange knowledge. Second, who was notified during the downtime, and why didn't they respond?
P.S. the absolute easiest and quickest way to copy the server doesn't even require the server to be on. Kek!
Took a closer look at that DS output. Again, it's been a while, but without knowing what the sids refer to, it's a little hard to know what's going on.
Who the hell would name their exchange server "finapp"?! That looks like automated setup of a financial application server/workstation, wether through scripting or MS's software (forget the name at the moment. Used to push out via WOL).
Btw, if that is a real DS output, the admin is even dumber and that server is even more insecure than we've been led to believe.
Anyway, when pushing out images, it's common for admin passwords to go out with the image, but not named "admin", which isn't even a default admin name in MS.