Anonymous ID: ecfad2 July 18, 2018, 12:05 a.m. No.2196796   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2195892 lb

>>2195908 lb

Re the notables/QResearch culture/newfags debate:

 

>>2196118 lb

This ^^^ is using Q's words to advocate for a position that Q himself has not requested.

 

Q advocated/instructed this:

>QResearchers should have Proofs prepared for newfags to spread/discuss

 

Which is very different from this:

>make all newfags into QResearchers, and slow/muddy your own research efforts in order to help them catch up

 

The idea that Q would come to a group of people for their self-made brand of deciphering the world and then want to change it into something else… where in Q’s crumbs do you see this directive? Some newfags will be the kind that we rely on to spread/discuss into social media and IRL, and others will be autists by nature & start digging on their own. Newfags that don't follow their own initiative to read all past posts/crumbs to FIND things to dig aren’t autists. No amount of helpful notables will change that. Autists aren’t made by Qresearch, Qresearch was made by autists. This is all covered very clearly in the QResearch Welcome on the top link to every brad.

 

Notables should be shift-reports of the results of diggs for diggers, and the kind of news/keks that inspires them to digg other Q-related subjects. Because that’s the system the autists created before newfags flooded the place, and that’s what they’ve been asking for ever since. However well-meaning it might be, it would be foolish to ruin the environment that helps QResearchers do their thing in hopes it will turn everyone into obsessive fact-finders and dot-connectors. You wouldn’t even want that, kek!

 

WWG1WGA means same destination.

Not same role.