>Boss can you get Elon and team (Team America,) onto this asap please…
Elon and his team built and launched an independent satellite constellation that provides global bypass of oppressive regimes years ago.
>Boss can you get Elon and team (Team America,) onto this asap please…
Elon and his team built and launched an independent satellite constellation that provides global bypass of oppressive regimes years ago.
>fuck is stefanek a communist nigger?
$20 is $20.
She'll say what you want if you give her a meatball.
>doesn't mean wise or knowledgeable.
This is a perfect opportunity for you to display your wisdom and knowledge, Anon. Show us a comm with meaning. Kek.
>That adds nothing to an argument.
Exactly. The problem is many do not understand that yet. That's what created the need for TOGTFO in the first place, Anon.
What is your logical argument, Anon? Where is the comm? All I see is a Q Post. Where's the diagram with the red lines?
>just a good drop decoder.
Drops and decodes are not a good mix, Anon. Q specifically mentioned BS decodes. What is it you are good at?:
push pre-determined and orchestrated 'false-claim' statements of others [think DECODES]?
Action was needed [2].
Prevent false DECODES/misinformation
They revealed themselves.
Fake & False [incorrect] DECODES removed/resolved.
https://qalerts.net/?q=decodes
3 post(s) found containing "decodes".
Anons have no gender.
> an error - as the Truth Social ID [171717] is fake - made up - not true??
It's pointless anyway. Why is a 'Q Proof' needed?
It's not that it was inaccurate, Anon. It was simply meaningless. You will never know why Q posted the name of that firm. The rest is fantasy. 'Q Proofs', 'Comms' and 'Decodes' are simply fantasy reinforced by groupthink and a reluctance to admit the emperor has no clothes.
Your reliance on insults and invective is quite telling, Anon. You have signaled an inability to continue a calm, rational, meaningful discussion. You have lost your grip on the rational and slid into emotion. Have a good night, Anon.
>At least it is a new slide.
>Working because you are talking to him.
Everyone who bucks groupthink is a shill.
Good meme. A creative modification saying 'This is a Q Proof' or 'This is Comms' followed by the appropriate group response would be more appropriate.
>You merely disparage them
No one has been disparaged. Pointless 'Q Proofs have been questioned that ought to be questioned. For example, last bread there was a graphic connecting 'Red Castle' and Captain Mike Green. The OP became frustrated because questions were asked about the connection. The graphic was nonsense based on childlike number or word matching. /qresearch does not award participation trophies for word association graphics that lack logic or reason.
Thank you, Anon. You have clearly retired from the field.
>What is this? Any anon splain this ?
If an Anon applies for and receives a concealed carry permit to carry a concealed firearm in a US State that requires a CC permit then every other State must honor that concealed carry permit.
I have no objection to it at all, Anon. The technique conveys very little information, however, and creates the impression that what Q wrote needs to be 'decoded' somehow. It does not. Decodes are worthless.
>What if your state doesn’t require a CC license??
Mine does not so I have not researched POTUS' policy.
>Decodes are for paytriots
>tellem.
It's unfortunate that early Q movement grifters created the expectation that the Q drops needed to be 'decoded'. A great deal of time, effort, creativity, and talent has been poured down that hole.
https://qalerts.net/?q=decodes
3 post(s) found containing "decodes".
>there can't be a 'culture' when there are only 751 posts in a bread.
It's been over seven years worth of 751 post breads, Anon. Not to mention that Q sought out 4chan which created the chan culture years before.
>Just call them what they are, Flynn's Digital Soldiers.
>Enjoys exercising in futility.
Here's one for you. Might not be much, but it is a plausible explanation. What do you think?
When Q addressed 'EAM LOYALISTS' he was addressing a divided command. RED1 through RED6 are red lines. Q is telling the 'EAM Loyalists' - i.e. half of the divided command - not to cross these red lines. The vid explains EAM LOYALISTS in the context of a divided command.
>clock topic is a difficult one
Agreed. It was possibly promoted by Q in order to occupy OpFor analysts for the duration. The Map, too. Have a little ghost army over here, be a shame if you use your radio intercept resources listening to us.