This has already been posted a a couple times. The general consensus is of skepticism.
1) There is little chance that anyone beyond a handful of people would be made aware of it. This would be kept super hush hush.
2) It would not be admissible in court. There would be no point in Putin giving us this info or Trump accepting it with the political risk that would come wit hit.
Notables are not endorsements. They are simply noteworthy. They're the highlights of the bread. The standards don't need to be quite this strict.
Creditable sauce and an explanation of significance, of not obvious, is enough.
You must have an incredible library of bookmarks.
The baker decides what is credible.
The point of Notables is to provide someone who wasn't here with Cliff-notes of whatever was interesting. It's not necessarily a distillate of the best research. I scan the notables list when I come on so I don't have to read thousand of posts. I'm find with anything the captures the spirit of the discussion, even if it's crap.
What kind of lights to they use in the Whitehouse that fadeout like this?
They could be on dimmers. But then whoever did it would notice 20% of the way down their mistake and correct it.
You can if it is to evade import taxes/tariffs.