Anonymous ID: 0a8078 July 18, 2018, 1:07 a.m. No.2197097   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2196706 (LB)

certainly noticed and appreciate it.

not sure how to take it, a little stunned, but honored in some small way for reasons I won't say.

some things are not meant to be explained, just known.

intentionally have not digested replies to date.

clearing the mind to give it untainted emotionless thought.

the weight of the scope, can take its toll.

anonymous made it unstoppable.

(((they))) really don't like it when you can see (((them))).

anons making me proud, always knew they were the key.

drives inspiration for even bigger things to come.

the future, lent to our hands.

we are the happening.

we will taste victory.

our people will be free.

destiny awaits.

Anonymous ID: 0a8078 July 18, 2018, 3:20 a.m. No.2197609   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7626

>>2197104

i'm on multiple allnighters.. but don't want to leave you hanging tho, so here goes:

 

it is clear night crew is the last bastion of hope.

this is the group of anons that will naturally collaborate to a solution.

daycrew's mission is to interact with the normie herd, to educate them so they spread redpills in their circles.

daycrew has been awol for a long minute.

there are great habbenings for sure, but something is off, especially of late.

driveby commenting without much development of connections.

anons need to come together and develop a solution to counter-psyop.

to boomerang normie around the honeypot tactics and put them on the front lines of our offensive for good.

 

to give a definitive mission directive on my part, would distort the methods of success i suggest.

translated, I need you to feed me, and I feed another and so on then BOOM, we develop what is only possible between multiple minds collaborating - completely unpredictable - impossible to defend against in short order and is adaptable. the goal being to swing/draw normie influx to an even bigger mind-set (hyphen intentional)

 

a suggestion to start could be "tactics". develop a tactical anon formation for certain situations of known honeypotting: shill nigger says X we execute Y. Example Y = a stock meme or pastebin we put together, with protocols of execution, like: "rules of chan" (not my favorite example but I'm burned out). you might be thinking, "no fucking shit, we already know and do this" - the point being missed in QR is normiedayfag is not grasping what the fuck is said to them. They clearly don't start at the beginning. they are clueless that this environment even exists. they don't understand that they're walking into a psychological war zone and are being ID'd by (((them))) and us and getting caught up in the crossfire. if we can increase our daily share of normie recoveries, then we'll add that much more in capabilities and firepower of thought and observation.

 

the neat thing is that shill cannot interact on that level of normie personality, it is built into their dna to naturally expose themselves; i.e. they do not come here for what most fags do - a connection to people that give a fuck about truth - rather, it's to complete a specific mission. this should make it feasible to develop true-normie identifiers and vice versa.

 

problem is normiedayfag is very confused about all of it and latches onto the nigger psyop which appears as a 'normal' person posting compared to normal chan comms/winks. They go with what they know. To frame this: it's not an "ugh no pron for normie statement"; it's reinforcement of muh pron, muh pron necessary.

 

think of the walking dead - if you haven't seen it: one of the themes in the show when they meet drifters in the apocalypse is how many walkers have you killed… how many people have you killed… why? etc. It's a sweep analysis of that person. So, to a subject anon, you would pose a question, that you know only a newdayfag normie would respond to in a certain way. Once confirmed, you take 'em under your pepe wing. it's practical to do if you apply that we already know most are shill, so all you'd really need to do is sweep the questionable ones while pointing out shill's tactics.

 

it could even be as simple as an anon does an ask me anything newfag about once a bread during 5a-1a est. say an anon does ama but he fucks up the responses to questions(intentionally), other middie-anons will jump in to set the record straight. The ensuing mayhem becomes our psyop, which results in a fervent discussion about Q accuracy - the counter to what the shills are trying to achieve which is dead-end arguments. in our psyop argument, we educate the normish. boomerang nigga!