>>2196202 (lb)
>white "men" protesting white men.
Before I say what I'm about to say, please note that I am being completely un-sarcastic and non-rhetorical:
Are these people out of their fucking minds? I'm serious. Are they really?
>>2196202 (lb)
>white "men" protesting white men.
Before I say what I'm about to say, please note that I am being completely un-sarcastic and non-rhetorical:
Are these people out of their fucking minds? I'm serious. Are they really?
Watch this ;)
I wonder who the Jews pissed off so much to get almost non-stop spam shilling attacks waged on them?
>starts egg timer
Israel is last for a very good reason ;) Think of it as the chess pieces for that particular part of the game being in place now.
>They are simply noteworthy. They're the highlights of the bread.
Exactly. They are ''working notes''. Nothing more, nothing less.
>>>2197138
That's all great and well but we've learned over time here that adding extra steps for dubious gains is something clowns like to suggest. Now, I'm not calling you a clown, but you should keep that in mind; They've attempted several times to change the format of the bread itself.
That is not happening. Our /goodbakers/ are doing exactly what they should be doing, and that won't be changing. Yes we want truthful accurate notables with sauce. It doesn't mean we add extra work for shits and giggles.
Have you looked into the Socratic method?
Is it easier to red pill someone by asking them a question that causes them to question things themselves?
>But I've observed what is credible sauce for one anon is not to another. โฆ Then obviously there are tag teams vying to be in "Notable" so they cane go reframe it and post on Reddit.
Anons are not doing this. They understand what checking the source of a source is, and that truth doesn't need high pressure sales tactics.
>Especially during dayshift.
You are talking about the day clowns, imo.
Already knew all individuals mentioned were comped, and agree with the postโฆ Was going for the snark factor.. Shadilay :)
ps- I'm sure Michael Hastings would also agree with you ;)