Anonymous ID: 3d397f July 18, 2018, 1:36 a.m. No.2197217   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7220 >>7272

>>2197193

>They are simply noteworthy. They're the highlights of the bread.

 

Exactly. They are ''working notes''. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

>>>2197138

 

That's all great and well but we've learned over time here that adding extra steps for dubious gains is something clowns like to suggest. Now, I'm not calling you a clown, but you should keep that in mind; They've attempted several times to change the format of the bread itself.

 

That is not happening. Our /goodbakers/ are doing exactly what they should be doing, and that won't be changing. Yes we want truthful accurate notables with sauce. It doesn't mean we add extra work for shits and giggles.

Anonymous ID: 3d397f July 18, 2018, 2:11 a.m. No.2197320   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7432

>>2197272

>But I've observed what is credible sauce for one anon is not to another. โ€ฆ Then obviously there are tag teams vying to be in "Notable" so they cane go reframe it and post on Reddit.

 

Anons are not doing this. They understand what checking the source of a source is, and that truth doesn't need high pressure sales tactics.

 

>Especially during dayshift.

 

You are talking about the day clowns, imo.