dChan
Anonymous ID: 87de4c July 18, 2018, 1:16 a.m. No.2197138   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7166 >>7193 >>7220 >>7312

>>2197063

You know how to copy and paste? Yes

You know how to create a new thread? Yes

Okay I will think on it.

 

But..

 

>>>Notables would be the only thing you may need to practice getting into the dough,

 

I think we need set criteria for notables.

 

My suggestion would be poster must provide:

 

1.) brief summary of article/video (one sentence would do)

2.) brief statement how/why poster thinks it relates to a Q drop (one sentence would do)

3.) provide link(s)

Anons who nominate

1.) Must clearly state why they are nominating (one sentence) and

2.) Must put notable in red no further than the post 650; otherwise risk not going in next bread and

3.) No one can nominate their own post as notable

 

Drops mic.

 

Feel free to chime in.

Anonymous ID: 87de4c July 18, 2018, 1:21 a.m. No.2197167   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7207

>>2197137

I guess I missed the December extraction theory. I still recall October 2016 with the fuckery that occurred after PA visited JA. There were rumors of the embassy being surrounded and then JA went dark and anons were calling for proof of life. And then months passed and there was that interview w/ Hannity which was obviously green-screened and there were drops on /pol by an alleged wikileaks worker claiming they were under gag order and advising /pol anons to get the word out that WL was comped – not to send leaks there anymore. And then there was fuckery with that Kim dot com. And well, I just wonder where and how is JA?

Anonymous ID: 87de4c July 18, 2018, 1:52 a.m. No.2197272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7313 >>7320

>>2197217

>>2197193

 

Okay. But I've observed what is credible sauce for one anon is not to another. Sometimes starts a whole shit show. Especially during dayshift. Then obviously there are tag teams vying to be in "Notable" so they cane go reframe it and post on Reddit.

Who or what determines credible? Obviously not AJ or Corsi or the Buzzfeed. But what about CNN or MSNBC or WaPo or NYT? You see where I am going with this?

Anonymous ID: 87de4c July 18, 2018, 2:18 a.m. No.2197338   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7374

>>2197295

Kekekekekek.

 

One last question regarding baking, Anon. Well, maybe two; make that three.

 

I use a MacBook and I keep ignoring the updates because I read on here anons who did update had trouble getting here. Would you foresee problems with baking with MacBook?

 

Macs have some sort of Notepad but I always just use Word. If I started keeping track of Notables for bakers, couldn't I just use Word and copy pasta into reply box?

 

I would also be concerned about fast moving beads. How long, in terms of time, does the "average" bread last?

Anonymous ID: 87de4c July 18, 2018, 2:39 a.m. No.2197432   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2197320

 

There's been a whole new vibe to dayshift of late, Anon. Still some regular anons, but also an influx of what I perceive to be new #QAnonners who, imho, seem to find OMG "hidden significance" in every Tweet, gesture, and color of shoe.

 

And then, yea, I've observed some will tag team NOTABLES, resulting in some very long NOTABLES, all the while anons bitching at the baker – "yes it's notable, no it's not."

 

And that's not even mentioning the clowns and the shills, as far as I know.

 

Night breads are best, have always been best, but unfortunately, most of the time I need to sleep. So I catch ya'll as I can for reasonable research discussion and a few keks.

 

Dayshift not so much any more.