>If it is true…
If true this would explain the Capitol Hill mass casualty preparations and the legislation enabling the rapid selection of substitute representatives.
>Can someone give a recap on Brunson case.
There are several 'Brunson cases'. In Brunson v. Adams one of the brothers Brunson's petitions went to a USSC conference but certiorari was denied.
Background
Mr. Brunson filed a pro se civil action in Utah state court against hundreds of members of Congress, President Joseph Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Michael Pence. He alleged that before accepting the electoral votes on January 6, 2021, defendants intentionally refused to investigate evidence that the November 2020 presidential election was fraudulent. Mr. Brunson likened defendants' conduct to an act of war against the United States Constitution that violated their oath to uphold the Constitution and his right to participate in an honest and fair election. He advanced constitutional, tort, and promissory estoppel claims and sought almost three billion dollars in damages. He also asked for injunctive relief including removal of defendants from office and reinstatement of Donald Trump as President of the United States.
https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams-4
>[food additives]
Lead is showing up in the strangest places lately … cinnamon, turmeric, … it's almost like targeted segments of the world community were being intentionally poisoned.
>Q said we will be united on 11/11/18
/route_DoD_11.11.18/
America Will Be Unified Again.
Q
>When are heads going to roll?
Kek. The entire plan was designed to avoid that. Prepare for the ' … it's time to spare this great nation from the pain and repercussions associated with tribunals and the risk of retribution visited upon our fellow citizens … blah … blah …blah'.
>This one is kind of a big deal.
Why? It was explained by Q, in context, in 2019:
Reminder re: impeachment.
2/3rd Senate vote required to impeach POTUS.
53-47
Logical thinking.
Q