>>21971762

if you refuse to see, then yeah, you're blind;

Can't help stoopid

or deliberate closing one's eyes?

Eyes wide shut?

Is that you, Epstein?

If you believe something strongly, something that is false.

Then yes, your vision and comprehension will be obscured.

"those who want to know…"

is not you.

If you can't believe it or refuse to, then yeah you will fail to understand.

>>21971600

Wonder why they pick on Vance?

weird.

>>21971777

chkt

Yes, Trump is really jerking people around with these false start rumor nominations.

keke

tyb

>>21971793

>>21971856

the first links were lb

>>21971876

he's got a pit bull look?

>>21971918

>>21971997

>>21972027

I did that too and pasted the address

>>21971997

>>21971928

>>21972027

>>21972288

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/404192-fbi-denies-trump-claim-that-china-hacked-clintons-private-email/

Here's the article referenced in the Q note #3045

What a difference between then and now. Then, by John Bowden - 08/29/18 1:24 PM ET

people would have no doubt around the validity of the FBi's claim, unless you directly knew differnt.

there is it. proof positive

Fb1 lied about Trump and attempted to set him up .

China had access. She gave it to them. No need to hack it?

FBI covering for Clinton

Who did leak the emails?

>>21971997

>>21972392

Rep Ratcliffe tweet referenced in Q#2045 is missing.

anybody have a copy?

Seems like Ratcliffe's the perfect person to enact declass;

The original order which was never carried out by the guilty.

>>21971997

>>21971932

they are running like scared dogs with their tails between their legs.

maybe put the faces in later?