Right. Didn't read that far.
again?
>you just have to look past the words and see the Word
In other words. Interpret it like you want to interpret it regardless of the words.
Sounds very progressive.
How am I wrong?
You literally said to:
>look past the words
meaning, you disregard the words to:
>see the Word
How do you know "the word" (i.e. your interpretation) is the correct meaning?
Spoiler, you don't.
You are just a hope addict, calling your hope "faith".
>YOU claim one does not know.
Yeah.. that's why it's called "faith".
Faith is something you have in the absence of knowledge.
>You don't seek, you argue truth doesn't exist.
Wat? When have I said truth doesn't exist?
I argue that your "faith" is not truth.
You have been lied to your whole life, by the people who were supposed to help and guide you.
Yet, the one ancient book that your early ancestors were forced to follow or be put to death, that has since controlled the minds of your ancestors for millennia. That book has to be the one TRUTH that has not been corrupted?
Reconcile
Disagreements != Division