>>21986242 (pb)
>It is now day 10 after the Election and California is still counting
CA law allows them to take up to 40 days to certify an election.
>>21985243 (pb), >>21985284 (pb)
>Steve Bannon interview with aj and the story of the auction of infowars
Something to keep in mind: Even if The Onion succeeds at purchasing Infowars, they cannot buy Alex Jones. The same thing will happen with Infowars that happened with Project Veritas. James O'Keefe left and set up O'Keefe Media. Project Veritas went to nothing. Alex Jones has set up the Alex Jones Network. If Infowars is successfully purchased, Alex Jones does not go with it. Without Alex Jones, Infowars will fail, just as Project Veritas deflated without James O'Keefe.
If you want to follow Alex Jones, try the following:
https://realalexjones.com/
https://alexjones.network/
https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
https://twitter.com/AJNlive
https://www.rumble.com/c/c-6757509
You know what's funny about this. The judge in the Infowars hearing rejected the sale of Infowars to The Onion. But news about the purchase has been published as recently as the past hour. At this point, that's fake news. It isn't true anymore. The Onion currently has no claim on Infowars. So any of these articles published in the last couple of hours are fake news.
So the fake news on the image of the search is from The New York Times, Reuters, and Texas Monthly.
BTW, Alex Jones mentioned on his livestream that Elon Musk showed up at the hearing. I don't see anyone else talking about that.
Alex Jones just said that InfowarsStore.com is not owned by Infowars or Alex Jones, so whoever buys Infowars doesn't get that, either.
If that were true, the DS wouldn't be going after him. According to Alex Jones, one of those DS parties is George Soros or his successors.
A lot of that going on these days.
As for Pic 2, sauce is important. If you've got sauce, CITE IT! Best to give us more than a link. Do something more like an academic citation. Then, if it disappears from one place, it'll be easier to find the mirrors.
I have to admit, Elon Musk is somewhat dubious. He owns all of the pieces needed for a global control system.
But I do like what he did with Twitter.