Alex Jones Reaches Out to Justice Dept. About Jan. 6 Interview

The effort by the Trump ally to get an immunity deal is the latest sign of progress in the investigation, which recently brought on a well-regarded prosecutor.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/20/us/politics/alex-jones-jan-6-interview.html

By Alan Feuer, Adam Goldman and Katie Benner

April 20, 2022

The federal investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election appears to be gaining traction, with the Justice Department having brought in a well-regarded new prosecutor to help run the inquiry

and a high-profile witness seeking a deal to provide information.

Alex Jones, the host of the conspiracy-driven media outlet Infowars and a key player in the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” movement, is in discussions with the Justice Department about an agreement to detail

his role in the rally near the White House last Jan. 6 that preceded the attack on the Capitol.

Through his lawyer, Mr. Jones said he has given the government a formal letter conveying “his desire to speak to federal prosecutors about Jan. 6.”

The lawyer, Norm Pattis, maintained that Mr. Jones had not engaged in any “criminal wrongdoing” that day when — chanting slogans about 1776 — he helped lead a crowd of Trump supporters in a march to the Capitol

as violence was erupting.

As a condition of being interviewed by federal investigators, Mr. Jones, who is known for his rants about the “Deep State” and its supposed control over national affairs, has requested immunity from prosecution.

“He distrusts the government,” Mr. Pattis said.

While convincing federal prosecutors to grant him immunity could be an uphill climb for Mr. Jones, his discussions with the Justice Department suggest that the investigation into the postelection period could be gathering momentum.

Two weeks ago, another prominent Stop the Steal organizer, Ali Alexander, a close associate of Mr. Jones, revealed that he had received a subpoena from a federal grand jury that is

seeking information on a broad swath of people — rally planners, members of Congress and others close to former President Donald J. Trump — connected to political events that took place in the run-up to Jan. 6.

Mr. Alexander, who marched with Mr. Jones to the Capitol that day, has said that he intends to comply with the subpoena.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/20/us/politics/alex-jones-jan-6-interview.html

Alex Jones met with 1/6 committee and says he pleaded the Fifth ‘almost 100 times’

By Annie Grayer and Oliver Darcy, CNN Tue January 25, 2022

Right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones met virtually on Monday with the House select committee investigating the January 6 insurrection, he announced on his broadcast.

A source familiar with the investigation confirmed the meeting to CNN.

“I just had a very intense experience being interrogated by the January 6 committee,” Jones said on his broadcast on Monday. “They were polite, but they were dogged.”

Jones said that, by his lawyer’s count, he had pleaded the Fifth Amendment “almost 100 times” and that he had been told to do so “on advice of counsel.”

Jones said that while he had wanted to answer the questions, he was afraid to do so because he believes that the committee, specifically Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California, would twist his words,

and Jones said he had been afraid of not answering all questions correctly and potentially perjuring himself.

“The questions were overall pretty reasonable,” Jones said. “And I wanted to answer the questions, but at the same time it’s a good thing I didn’t,

because I’m the type that tries to answer things correctly even though I don’t know all the answers, and they can kind of claim that that’s perjury, because about half the questions I didn’t know the answer to.”

Jones said he had been shown “a bunch of emails” that he had not seen before. He also said he believes that the committee has gotten access to his phone because he was shown text messages from his phone,

including messages with January 6 rally organizers Cindy Chafian and Caroline Wren, who also have been subpoenaed by the committee.

“They have everything that’s already on my phones and things, because I saw my text messages to Caroline Wren and Cindy Chafian and some of the event organizers,” Jones said.

On his show, Jones shared that the panel had asked him repeatedly who his White House contact was to help with rally planning and organizing.

Jones said that Caroline Wren, a major fundraiser for the Donald Trump campaign, was his contact for rallies on January 5 and 6.

Jones suggested that Wren was with a group of officials at the Ellipse on January 6 who led him “to the back of the stage so we could then go and get around the crowd and go lead the march.”

Jones said he had sought to direct people to a spot near the Capitol where organizer Ali Alexander planned to hold a permitted rally. He said he did not support people going into the Capitol, which he called “so stupid and so dumb.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/25/politics/alex-jones-january-6-plead-fifth/index.html

Alex Jones met with 1/6 committee and says he pleaded the Fifth ‘almost 100 times’

By Annie Grayer and Oliver Darcy, CNN Tue January 25, 2022

In its subpoena letter to Jones, the committee cited news reports and his own statements to make the connection between Jones, Wren and Chafian and said the three worked toward “facilitating a donor,

now known to be Julie Fancelli, to provide what (he) characterized as ‘eighty percent’ of the funding” for the rally on the Ellipse on January 6.

The committee stated that Jones had been denied a speaking spot at the January 6 rally but that his previous comments indicate he had been designated to “lead a march to the Capitol,

where President Trump would meet the group.”

Jones said on Monday that it was the belief of those at the Capitol that Trump was going to join them in some capacity after his speech at the Ellipse on January 6.

Jones said he heard from witnesses to the committee that Trump had told his then-chief of staff, Mark Meadows, that he wasn’t going to meet his supporters at the Capitol

but could drive by or fly over the crowd with a helicopter because he had done that at other large events.

Jones said Trump “kept marveling” at the size of the crowd and that the then-President “was super excited” about the number of people gathering at the Capitol.

Jones also relayed on Monday that the committee had asked him whether he had heard of any plans for violence on January 6.

Jones said the only talk he had heard about possible violence was through news reports and that he was not privy to any insider information. He described it as “background noise” that you “always hear about politics in America.”

“There was, you know, headlines about insurrection acts and Trump was all over the news. But I was getting this from the news like everybody else,” Jones said.

He denounced any suggestion that he had been involved in the planning of violence at the Capitol.

“Let’s get something clear for the committee and my audience and everybody else: I don’t want a civil war in this country, and that’s a terrible idea,” he said. “And I don’t want lawlessness by anybody.

And I don’t want anybody attacking anybody, OK?”

‘So stupid and so dumb’

Jones acknowledged that he uses rhetoric about fighting but said that applied only to the information wars. He has repeatedly used hostile rhetoric and references to war in his messages about the election.

“InfoWar means we fight with information,” Jones said, adding that it was a “nonviolent war.”

The committee’s subpoena to Jones referenced comments from a guest host on his program on December 31, 2020, that seemed to foreshadow the riot.

“We’re going to only be saved by millions of Americans moving to Washington, occupying the entire area, if necessary storming right into the Capitol,” the host, Matt Bracken, had told viewers.

On his show Monday, Jones condemned those comments that had been made on his show, claimed he hadn’t heard them before he had received the subpoena and said, “Quite frankly, I was shocked by it.”

Jones also shared that he had learned from his deposition that the committee listens to his show almost every day.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/25/politics/alex-jones-january-6-plead-fifth/index.html

Alex Jones met with 1/6 committee and says he pleaded the Fifth ‘almost 100 times’

By Annie Grayer and Oliver Darcy, CNN Tue January 25, 2022

Jones said the committee also asked him whether he used Oath Keepers or Proud Boys as security.

He said he hired his own private security but added that he later found out that the leader of the Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes, “would assign someone to us.” CNN previously reported that

Rhodes’ Oath Keepers protected Jones at multiple “Stop the Steal” rallies and that some were tasked with providing a personal security detail for Jones and Alexander on January 6.

“I had 12 to 14 security people,” Jones said, elaborating that he hired a “well-known private security company” based out of Texas that provided him with personnel composed of “DC and Maryland police.”

“I go and try to get professional people,” Jones added, joking that they were probably Democrats.

Jones did say that everywhere he went, people “of every different type” followed him around.

He revealed that he had eaten at a Hooters restaurant with some members of the Proud Boys after attending a rally in Georgia prior to January 6.

Jones, referring to the indictment of Rhodes on seditious conspiracy charges, said that if the Oath Keepers were attempting to foment a violent rebellion, it’s not something he knew about or desired.

The committee acknowledged specifically in its subpoena to Jones that once at the Capitol, he had told people “not to be violent” and to gather and wait for Trump to speak.

Even though Trump never went to the Capitol that day, the committee said the location where Jones had told people to wait “coincided” with the place that

“Stop the Steal” rally organizer Alexander had obtained a permit for that day.

On his show, Jones said he had tried to discourage people from entering the Capitol but described containing the crowd as “mission impossible.”

“We learned there were a bunch of people inside the Capitol,” Jones said. “And that was so stupid and so dumb. I didn’t support it that day and I don’t support it now.”

“We got the hell out of there once we couldn’t stop it,” Jones later added, calling January 6 a “horrible historic fiasco” and saying he wished it had “never happened.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/25/politics/alex-jones-january-6-plead-fifth/index.html

Alex Jones said that he had a "White House Contact" on Jan 06 and during congressional testimony Alex revealed that Caroline Wren was the White House Contact.

Caroline Wren with funding from Publix Heiress Julie Jenkins Fancelli via Women for America First, obtained a permit for the rally featuring former president Donald Trump.

Caroline Wren

https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolinewren

Company website for Caroline Wren redirects to:

https://www.lindseygraham.com/

BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Caroline Wren, president of BlueBonnet Fundraising

By POLITICO STAFF

10/10/2018 05:14 AM EDT

How/where are you celebrating your birthday and with whom?

“I have friends and family flying in from all over the country and @LoganDobson and I are having a joint birthday party at my house in D.C. on Friday including

(but not limited to) margarita machines, mariachi band, face painters, fog machine, mezcal bar, etc. @DaveCatanese is also expected to DJ for a portion of the evening.”

How did you get your start in politics?

“In 2007 for Christmas I asked my parents for a flight to New Hampshire to go and campaign forJohn McCain.

I showed up unannounced at the McCain New Hampshire HQ and luckily someone let me sleep on their floor and I spent a week waving McCain signs in the snow.

From then on I was hooked and ended up taking a semester off from Auburn University to work on the McCain campaign and I’ve been in politics ever since.”

What’s an interesting book/article you’re reading now or finished? And why?

“With the election less than a month away, I’m currently not reading anything other than Excel documents and direct mail copy.”

What is a trend going on in the U.S. or abroad that doesn’t get enough attention?

“The ‘Lindsey Graham for President 2024’ campaign :)”

How is the Trump presidency going?

“-3.7% unemployment … -Passed historic tax cuts … -Confirmed Gorsuch & Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court … -Massive rollback of unnecessary job-killing regulations … -

Recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital … -ended the War on Christmas. I’m not sick of winning.”

What’s a fun fact that people in Washington might not know about you?

“I love to travel and have visited over 35 countries including backpacking trips through Southeast Asia, Europe and the Middle East.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/10/playbook-birthday-caroline-wren-886200

Jul 02, 2020 5:18:30 PM EDT4566

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 3bbfe0 No. 9829982

https://twitter.com/rn__deplorable/status/1278778177574318086

Impressive, most impressive.

Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example]

Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today.

ONE LEADS TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER.

ONE LEADS TO MANY.

Crimes against Children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][mass pop awakening].

Have faith in Humanity.

Q

Bannons War RoomCaroline Wren: Pelosi Wasted Americans Time And Money On J6 Hoax That Was Her Fault

Caroline Wren is a Senior Advisor to Kari Lake

Caroline Wren got her start in Politics working forMcCain and then Lindsey Graham

https://rumble.com/embed/v4yhdj5/?pub=4

Dinesh D'SouzaALARMING: New Footage Shows Pelosi's True Reaction To Jan 6

https://rumble.com/embed/v4yhayo/?pub=4

The Dan Bongino ShowThe REAL January 6th Story Is Starting To Come Out (Ep. 2268) - 06/11/2024

Summary: In this episode, I discuss the new information that is blowing the lid on what happened behind the scenes on January 6th, more on the operation to replace Biden and other breaking news.

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ylqv3/?pub=4

The Charlie Kirk ShowHunter Biden, Convict + The Pelosi Tapes + Censoring Prager | Schlichter, Alexander, Prager | LIVE

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ymcni/?pub=4

NEWSMAXNancy Pelosi upends anti-Trump January 6 narrative in new video

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ylnqu/?pub=4

MJTruthNEW Footage Shows Nancy Pelosi Admitting she was Responsible for the National Guard on January 6th

https://rumble.com/embed/v4yglpx/?pub=4

RedpillUSAPatriotsNancy Pelosi responds on MSNBC to the bombshell behind the scenes footage of her admitting responsibility for the lack of National Guard Troops on J6

https://rumble.com/embed/v4yi5d9/?pub=4

RealAmericasVoiceWhy Were They Caught Flat-Footed?

https://rumble.com/embed/v4yhrbf/?pub=4

Terrence K WilliamsBreaking! New Footage of Nancy Pelosi Admitting Responsibility on January 6 and not calling guards

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ygnr0/?pub=4

Laura LoomerNancy Pelosi EXPOSED for Election Interference While on Capitol Hill!!!

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ygts5/?pub=4

AMERICA First with Sebastian GorkaPelosi didn't know the camera was on. John Solomon with Sebastian Gorka on AMERICA First

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ygmuq/?pub=4

Benny JohnsonNew LEAKED Video Of Pelosi Admitting She Was ‘In Charge’ of January 6th SHOCKS: ‘I am Responsible’

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ygt6h/?pub=4

The Big MigPelosi’s Fedsurrection w/ guest Jonathan Rose, CEO Genesis Gold Group |EP302

https://rumble.com/embed/v4yj3ef/?pub=4

Wendy Bell RadioThe "INSURRECTION" Story Blows Up

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ykezt/?pub=4

‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6

In a 36-page memo to the Capitol riot committee, Col. Earl Matthews also slams the Pentagon’s inspector general for what he calls an error-ridden report.

A former D.C. National Guard official is accusing two senior Army leaders of lying to Congress and participating in a secret attempt to rewrite the history of the military’s response to the Capitol riot.

In a 36-page memo, Col. Earl Matthews, who held high-level National Security Council and Pentagon roles during the Trump administration, slams the Pentagon’s inspector general for what he calls an error-riddled report that protects a top Army official who argued against sending the National Guard to the Capitol on Jan. 6, delaying the insurrection response for hours.

Matthews’ memo, sent to the Jan. 6 select committee this month and obtained by POLITICO, includes detailed recollections of the insurrection response as it calls two Army generals — Gen. Charles Flynn, who served as deputy chief of staff for operations on Jan. 6, and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, the director of Army staff — “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their characterization of the events of that day. Matthews has never publicly discussed the chaos of the Capitol siege.

On Jan. 6, Matthews was serving as the top attorney to Maj. Gen. William Walker, then commanding general of the D.C. National Guard. Matthews’ memo defends the Capitol attack response by Walker, who now serves as the House sergeant at arms, amplifying Walker’s previous congressional testimony about the hourslong delay in the military’s order for the D.C. National Guard to deploy to the riot scene.

“Every leader in the D.C. Guard wanted to respond and knew they could respond to the riot at the seat of government” before they were given clearance to do so on Jan. 6, Matthews’ memo reads. Instead, he said, D.C. guard officials “set [sic] stunned watching in the Armory” during the first hours of the attack on Congress during its certification of the 2020 election results.

Matthews’ memo levels major accusations: that Flynn and Piatt lied to Congress about their response to pleas for the D.C. Guard to quickly be deployed on Jan. 6; that the Pentagon inspector general’s November report on Army leadership’s response to the attack was “replete with factual inaccuracies”; and that the Army has created its own closely held revisionist document about the Capitol riot that’s “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist.”

The memo follows Walker’s own public call for the inspector general to retract its detailed report on the events of Jan. 6, as first reported by The Washington Post. Walker told the Post he objected to specific allegations by the Pentagon watchdog that Matthews’ memo also criticizes, calling the inspector general’s report “inaccurate” and “sloppy work.”

The new memo from Matthews, who now serves in the Army reserves, emerges as officials involved in the response that day try to explain their decision-making to investigators. The House select committee has probed the attack for months, and earlier this year top officials testified before the House oversight panel.

Reached for comment, Matthews said the memo he wrote is entirely accurate. “Our Army has never failed us and did not do so on January 6, 2021,” he said. “However, occasionally some of our Army leaders have failed us and they did so on January 6th. Then they lied about it and tried to cover it up. They tried to smear a good man and to erase history.”

Flynn, now the commanding general of the U.S. Army Pacific, and Piatt didn’t respond to messages. Army spokesperson Mike Brady said in a statement that the service’s “actions on January 6th have been well-documented and reported on, and Gen. Flynn and Lt. Gen. Piatt have been open, honest and thorough in their sworn testimony with Congress and DOD investigators.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777

‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6Part II

At the time, Piatt was the director of Army staff, one of the top generals in the Pentagon, and Flynn was the Army’s director of operations. The two men were the highest-ranking Army officials who spoke on the 2:30 call, according to Matthews.

“LTG Piatt stated that it would not be his best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army that the D.C. National Guard be allowed to deploy to the Capitol at that time,” Matthews wrote, adding: “LTGs Piatt and Flynn stated that the optics of having uniformed military personnel deployed to the U.S. Capitol would not be good.”

Piatt and Flynn suggested instead that Guardsmen take over D.C. police officers’ traffic duties so those officers could head to the Capitol, Matthews continues.

In addition to Matthews’ memo, POLITICO also obtained a document produced by a D.C. Guard official and dated Jan. 7 that lays out a timeline of Jan. 6. The D.C. Guard timeline, a separate document whose author took notes during the call, also said that Piatt and Flynn at 2:37 p.m. “recommended for DC Guard to standby,” rather than immediately deploying to the Capitol during the riot.

Four minutes later, according to that Guard timeline, Flynn again “advised D.C. National Guard to standby until the request has been routed” to then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy and then-acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller.

Everyone on the call was “astounded” except Piatt and Flynn, Matthews wrote.

Both men, however, later denied to Congress that they had said the Guard shouldn’t deploy to the Capitol.

In response to a written question from House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) in June about whether Piatt advised anyone in the Guard’s chain of command not to deploy directly to the Capitol, Piatt wrote, “At no point on January 6 did I tell anyone that the D.C. National Guard should not deploy directly to the Capitol.”

That statement, Matthews says in his memo, is “false and misleading.”

Walker also testified to Congress in March that Piatt and Flynn expressed concerns about “optics.”

Further, Flynn told Maloney that he “never expressed a concern about the visuals, image, or public perception of” sending Guardsmen to the Capitol.

That answer, Matthews says in his memo, is “outright perjury.”

Matthews wrote that he and Walker “heard Flynn identify himself and unmistakably heard him say that optics of a National Guard presence on Capitol Hill was an issue for him. That it would not look good. Either Piatt or Flynn mentioned ‘peaceful protestors.’”

Flynn’s brother, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, promulgated a host of conspiracy theories in the lead-up to Jan. 6 and called for former President Donald Trump to impose martial law. Matthews’ memo does not insinuate that Gen. Charles Flynn’s actions on Jan. 6 were shaped by his brother, who has been subpoenaed by the select committee, and does not mention Michael Flynn.

The two generals told the House oversight committee that the Guard wasn’t ready to respond to the chaos that day, and Flynn testified to the House Oversight Committee in June that a “team of over 40 officers and non-commissioned officers immediately worked to recall the 154 D.C. National Guard personnel from their current missions, reorganize them, re-equip them, and begin to redeploy them to the Capitol.” Matthews says that assertion “constituted the willful deception of Congress.”

“If it does not constitute the willful and deliberate misleading of Congress, then nothing does,” Matthews wrote of Flynn’s statement. “Flynn was referring to 154 D.C. Guardsmen who were already on duty, were trained in civil disturbance response, already had area familiarization with Washington, DC, were properly kitted and were delayed only because of inaction and inertia at the Pentagon.”

In other words, Matthews indicates, the idea that it took 40 officers to get 154 National Guard personnel ready to go to the Capitol beggars belief.

Every D.C. Guard leader was desperate to get to the Capitol to help, Matthews writes — then stunned by the delay in deployment. Responding to civil unrest in Washington is “a foundational mission, a statutory mission of the D.C. National Guard,” his memo notes.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777

‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6Part III

That report states that McCarthy had to call Walker twice on Jan. 6 to order him to deploy the D.C. Guard. Matthews’ memo calls this “an outrageous assertion … as insulting as it is false,” and says McCarthy himself was “incommunicado or unreachable for most of the afternoon.”

The inspector general’s report says McCarthy arrived at the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department at 4:05 p.m., and that “witnesses told us that not having heard from MG Walker regarding any specific plan.” McCarthy and others present, including D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee, themselves drafted a comprehensive plan for the Guard’s deployment, according to the Pentagon watchdog.

The report further says that soon afterward, Miller and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reviewed that plan over the phone. Miller authorized the deployment of the D.C. Guard and McCarthy informed Walker of it during a call at 4:35 p.m; McCarthy then held apress conference with the D.C. mayor and called Walker again to reissue the order that he deploy the Guard, according to the Pentagon inspector general.

Matthews challenges that Jan. 6 timetable in his memo. He writes that D.C. Guard leaders “still have not seen this so-called plan developed by McCarthy and allegedly approved by Acting Secretary Miller at 4:32PM.” He adds that the idea that the Army secretary would give Guard personnel support for tactical planning and coordination is “patently absurd.”

Walker, meanwhile, has said no call happened between him and McCarthy at 4:35 p.m. The D.C. Guard’s Jan. 6 timeline — produced while Walker helmed the D.C. National Guard — does not document any phone call between McCarthy and Walker at 4:35.

Both McCarthy and Miller declined to comment.

Megan Reed, a spokesperson for the Pentagon inspector general, said their office stands by its report.

Matthews’ memo also homes in on a document that Army officials have referenced but never fully revealed, titled “Report of the Army’s Operations on January 6 2021.” In Matthews’ view, it lays out a fabricated timeline in a bid to burnish the Army’s reputation.

According to Matthews, Piatt helped produce the document after a series of bruising congressional hearings and news reports that damaged the reputations of Army senior leadership — among them, a Washington Post report that the Army falsely denied Flynn’s participation in the 2:30 p.m. phone call.

“In March 2021, MG Walker was told by a friend that LTG Piatt was so upset with MG Walker that he directed the development of an Army ‘White Paper’ to retell events of 6 January in a light more favorable to LTGs Flynn, Piatt, Secretary McCarthy and the Army Staff,” Matthews writes.

The Army Staff ultimately sought “to create an alternate history which would be the Army’s official recollection of events,” Matthews continues, adding: “The end product, a revisionist tract worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist, was close hold,” kept secret from the public.

But members of Congress have seen the document. Piatt referenced it during a House Oversight Committee hearing in June when asked about conflicting recollections of the afternoon of Jan. 6.

“I would refer to the U.S. Army Report of Operations on January 6 that we submitted to this committee,” Piatt told lawmakers. “What the D.C. National Guard did in those short hours was extraordinary. Now when people’s lives are on the line, two minutes is too long. But we were not positioned to respond to that urgent request. We had to re-prepare so we would send them in prepared for … this new mission.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777

Kash Patel claims he was smeared by the January 6 committee for backing Trump's claims he authorized the National Guard

The Trump advisor says Jan. 6 smear campaign against him is dead

Transcript suppressed by the Jan. 6 panel was released and corroborates Patel's testimony about National Guard authorization

Ex-Acting Defense Secretary tells DailyMail.com Jan. 6 panel 'threatened' him to stay silent

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13215711/kash-patel-donald-trump-national-guard-capitol-riot.html

NG whistleblower: Trump was 'divested' as Commander-in-Chief on Jan. 6

Story by Katelyn Caralle, U.S. Political Reporter For Dailymail.Com In Washington, Dc

Col. Earl Matthews says Army leaders stripped Trump of authority on January 6

Claims they plotted to balk orders to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol

READ: Ex-Acting Defense Sec. Chris Miller says Jan. 6 panel threatened him

Donald Trump's authority as commander-in-chief was ignored by senior military leadership on January 6, 2021, claims the chief legal advisor for D.C. National Guard on that day.

https://www.msn.com/en-za/news/other/ng-whistleblower-trump-was-divested-as-commander-in-chief-on-jan-6/ar-AA1o68xs

Kash Patel: Senior Military Officials Intentionally Delayed National Guard Deployment on January 6th

By Rusty Weiss | 10:18 PM on May 13, 2024

https://redstate.com/rusty-weiss/2024/05/13/kash-patel-senior-military-officials-intentionally-delayed-national-guard-deployment-on-january-6th-n2174165

Colonel says Army punished him for claiming generals lied about Jan. 6

Jan. 3, 2024 at 6:19 pm Updated Jan. 3, 2024

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/colonel-says-army-punished-him-for-claiming-generals-lied-about-jan-6/

Army officer alleges reprisal for his account of Capitol riot response

Earl Matthews, a key figure in the Jan. 6 investigation, claims that, despite his qualifications for promotion, the Army has blocked his advancement.

By Dan Lamothe January 4, 2024

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/04/january-6-army-reprisal-claim/

Former D.C. Guard official accuses Army generals of lying to Congress about Jan. 6 response

In a 36-page memo, Col. Earl Matthews called the generals "absolute and unmitigated liars" for how they characterized events.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/former-d-c-guard-official-accuses-army-generals-lying-about-n1285423

Former Guard Official Says Army Retaliated for His Account

Jan 3, 2024 — A former top lawyer for the D.C. National Guard … Charles Flynn of being “absolute and unmitigated liars” in their testimony before Congress

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/03/us/politics/jan-6-national-guard-whistleblower-complaint.html

Army Officer Alleges Retaliation over Testimony on Slow National Guard Response to Jan. 6

A colonel who was the top lawyer for the D.C. National Guard during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection is accusing Army officials of retaliating against him for disputing two generals' account of why the National Guard was slow to deploy during the attack on the Capitol.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/01/04/army-officer-alleges-retaliation-over-testimony-slow-national-guard-response-jan-6.html

Ex-National Guard official says Army generals lied to Congress, alleging cover-up of decision to withhold troops from the Capitol on January 6

https://www.businessinsider.com/former-dc-guard-official-accuse-generals-lying-congress-january-6-2021-12

Former DC National Guard official accuses generals of lying about Capitol riot

In the memo, Matthews called Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, director of Army staff, “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their recollections of the Capitol riot.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/584478-former-dc-national-guard-official-accuses-generals-of-lying-about-capitol-riot/

‘This call never happened’: Ex-D.C. Guard leaders push back as internal Army report on Jan. 6 emerges

The report’s narrative is surfacing days after POLITICO first revealed a memo from a former top Guard official accusing two generals of lying to Congress.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/09/guard-leaders-push-back-army-january-6-report-523995

Who is Walter E Piatt?

''In early December 2021, Colonel Earl G. Matthews, a Trump appointee, released a rebuttal to the DoDIG report that accused LTG Piatt of making willful distortions of the events of January 6, describing Piatt and General Charles A. Flynn as "absolute and unmitigated liars" and of giving "perjured testimony before Congress."[18]

Fallout

Piatt was once the leading candidate to take over as the commanding general of United States Army Futures Command, and appointment to the rank of general.[19] He had received the recommendation from several top defense officials. However, he was rejected by President Biden[20] due to his handling of National Guard deployment during the January 6 attacks on the Capitol.[19][20] ''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt

Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence: report

Former Rep Liz Cheney's spokesperson says report 'flatly false'

By Emma Colton Fox NewsPublished March 10, 2024 1:43pm EDT

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report

QAnon Celebrity Jim Watkins Says He Met With the Jan. 6 Committee

The panel on Monday deposed the man who hosts the conspiracy theory that animated many of the rioters who stormed the Capitol

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jim-watkins-qanon-jan-6-committee-1363777/

QAnon Influencer Jim Watkins Says He Was ‘Interrogated’ by the Jan. 6 Committee

“You expect me to come here by a subpoena to rat out the President of the United States,” Jim Watkins wrote in a letter to the committee. “I will not be your Rasputin.”

https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjkdj3/qanon-jim-watkins-jan-6-committee

ARE YOU [COMFY]?

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b189f8 No. 130638 Jan 22, 2018 9:47:32 PM EST 586

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?

What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?

Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].

This is only the beginning.

Be careful what you wish for.

AS THE WORLD TURNS.

Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?

What happens to the FBI?

What happens to the DOJ?

What happens to special counsel?

What happens in general?

Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged.

Lawless.

Think logically.

We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst].

Those [good] who know cannot sleep.

Those [good] who know cannot find peace.

Those [good] who know will not rest until those responsible are held accountable.

Nobody can possibly imagine the pure evil and corruption out there.

Those you trust are the most guilty of sin.

Who are we taught to trust?

If you arereligious, PRAY.

60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity.

These people should be hanging.

Q

Aug 28, 2018 7:14:35 PM EDT Q Drop #1966

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f71ada No. 2773258

Aug 28, 2018 7:12:21 PM EDT

Anonymous ID: d8fac5 No. 2773199

>>2773040

Will be glorious?

In my humble opinion sir, it ALREADY is.

>>2773199

In our opinion, until those responsible are dead and/or suffering, it shall remain 'will be'.

Q

>>21991530

100% insulated

>>21991532

>>21991539

Dec 23, 2017 1:53:22 AM EST 442

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154583

Dec 23, 2017 1:46:21 AM EST

Anonymous ID: 50e089 No. 154493

Dec 23, 2017 1:44:16 AM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154468

>>154372

What rocket fired today?

[i]

Message sent.

Q

2017-12-23 00_46_02-Elon Musk on Twitter_ _Nuclear alien UFO from North Korea https___t.co_GUIHpKkkp.png

>>154468

>>154493

Message back.

UFO put out to detract from drops.

Q

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

Let’s set an age limit after which you can’t run for political office, perhaps a number just below 70 …

3:47 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

Trump would be 82 at end of term, which is too old to be chief executive of anything, let alone the United States of America.

If DeSantis runs against Biden in 2024, then DeSantis will easily win – he doesn’t even need to campaign.

10:16 PM · Jul 11, 2022

Nov 23, 2017 12:05:13 AM EST209

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 66o6MRSe No. 150562694

Why did BO scuttle the shuttle program?

What is SpaceX?

Expand your thinking.

Q

Nov 23, 2017 12:10:13 AM EST210

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 66o6MRSe No. 150563217

NK _ SpaceX.

Q

Holla Back, Ho's!

kek

>>21991558

[ELON] IS NOW ]ELON[

ENJOY!

That is how "We" play the Game!

Cry out to NIGHT SHIFT!

BETTER FORMULATE YOUR QUESTION OR BE LEFT BEHIND

JUST FILTER "Q, Q DROPS, QRESEARCH, PAIN, COMMS" AND ANYTHING ELSE THAT HURTS YOUR KAREN ASS