>>21992741

>11/15

>11 6

>11+6

I just love the mental gymnastics that involve breaking all rules of consistency. kek

>11/15 => 11 6

Why? Why do you sum the right sides digits but not the left sides.

>11+6

Why? 11 is now "unprocessed" while 6 is "processed" (i.e. they don't exist in the same equation) why is it fine for the left side to be "unprocessed" while the right is "processed"?

If your rules were consistent, your calculation could never arrive at 17.

But when allowed to be inconsistent, you can make any numbers equal 17.

>>21992814

>14:58:17

1+4 4+8 1+7

5+13 8

1+8 8

9+8

17

>>21992814

>>21992907 (me)

>1+4 5*+8 1+7

typo, but the additions are still correct.

>>21992947

Follow the chain from when I joined and you will see that my entire point was to show that it is exactly that…

>gibberish

>>21992963

>gibberish

I see, another inconsistency I hadn't noticed :D

So you can also just ignore numbers that doesn't fit. Wow, that makes it even easier to equal 17

>>21992978

>Math is hard.

That thing you just posted has nothing to do with math. KEK

>>21992986

>Counters a refutation of his argument with a 10 minute clip about fictional movies

Ok

>>21993000

Math is simply a framework.

For the framework to function it needs to have rules. If those rules are not followed, the result is not part of the framework.

>>21993018

I just did though…

>>21993038

Sure…

>1:45 11-15

~~1 45~~ 1+1 15

2 + 15

17

Just ignore the numbers that doesn't fit. EZ

>>21993054

How is that different from you looking at a full date and timespan but deciding that (among other numbers) the year is not to be included?

Kek

Inconsistency is fun

>>21993075

>everyone know this already.

Knows what? That you just pick and chose what numbers you deem "significant" and then add them together inconsistently, sometimes per digit sometimes as multi-digit numbers all of that within the same step of you equation.

What you are doing is as meaningful as reading tea leaves. Kek

>>21993075

I will concede that I cannot make this time stamp equal 17

>>21993114

>you lack creativity.

Great argument…

>>21993121

Nah, just a eurofag posting at exactly midnight.

I am proud of that time stamp tho.

>>21993129

>It's my opinion.

No shit.

>You're prob not very fun to hang out with.

My imaginary friends seem to enjoy my company.