Did the NSA Create Bitcoin? That's classified

Bitcoin is now the talk of the town (Wall St.) and yet we don't know who created it. There's lots of theories, but we haven't seen any documented evidence. Having experience in this business looking at the FX markets melt down over the last 10 years in a fraud climax, we wrote Splitting Pennies and explained the world isn't as it seems. That was before Bitcoin. Because like for any investment you want to do your due diligence, we started peeling back this onion and wanted to start from inception - and find out who created this (as just like with any investment analysis, it's another data point). What we found was astonishing - nothing! No documents, no photographs, no reports, from Satoshi. Whoever it was created a real pseudonym in order to mask their real identity. But why? Now the value of Satoshi's original coins would be in the tens of billions - why not claim them? It is our logic that it can only be someone or some group connected to the US Government, an employee perhaps - not necessarily that Bitcoin is the brainchild of the government, although that is possible as NSA has the best mathematicians in the world. We compiled this research into our leading hypothesis in an article here: EXPOSED: The real creator of Bitcoin is likely the NSA as One World Currency. Our point is not that we know 100% that this is the case, simply that it's the most plausible story, and we haven't uncovered any evidence to the contrary. Lots of people have different opinions, but they haven't produced any document proving otherwise. So we wrote the NSA and asked them, did you create Bitcoin? Hey, we are taxpayers. They work for us. Don't forget that! Their response was not surprising, they said "That's Classified"

While this is no surprise what we have started is a paper trail, hopefully that will lead to the revealing of the creator or creators of Bitcoin. For those who are not from the financial services community, it is important to note why anyone would go through such trouble - it's called due diligence. When investors make investments they want to know every single detail about that investment. Some of these DD questionnaires can be 100 pages they can have 300 questions! It can take months, require multiple flesh meetings, they may bring in external advisers - it may seem like a circus but if someone is investing $100 Million then it's really the least one can do. Anyway, do Bitcoin investors really understand what they are getting themselves into?

https:// www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-12/did-nsa-create-bitcoin-thats-classified

This article deserves a full read: Bitcoin Founder Satoshi Nakamoto was probably an NSA Employee — and the NSA may destroy Bitcoin

Bitcoin has a huge risk few consider: it can be destroyed overnight.

https:// medium.com/@collapsesurvivor/bitcoin-founder-satoshi-nakamoto-was-probably-an-nsa-employee-and-the-nsa-may-destroy-bitcoin-2767c5c865c5

>>2200485

Posted this because I have seen many posts on bitcoin with anon's intention to participate, while others are just looking for more information on the subject itself, watched a discussion on this last night for example. It seems to come up often on this board at varying times.

>>2200544

>>2200499

>>2200562

>>2200569

Doesn't matter what they want to do, only matters what the interpreter can say, which is nothing their lips are sealed.

see post: >>2199703 (pb)

Walter Jones, Tulsi Gabbard say undeclared war should be impeachable offense

Two long-time war critics in the House said Wednesday that President Trump and any other president should face impeachment for waging war without a formal declaration from Congress.

Reps. Walter Jones, R-N.C., and Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, have spent years calling for more scrutiny of U.S. wars, but upped their rhetoric by unveiling a resolution calling such military action punishable as “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Jones and Gabbard are both members of the House Armed Services Committee. The U.S. has not officially declared war since World War II, and forces fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot spots around the globe are covered under so-called authorizations for the use of military force passed by Congress after 9/11. “So our country continues to remain in a state of perpetual war at a great cost to the American people and to the innocent civilians around the world who are affected by these wars, with no declaration of war by Congress and no say by the American people,” Gabbard said.

Jones and other lawmakers have called regularly in recent years for Congress to consider updating the AUMF legislation that serves as the legal underpinning for the current military operations, but no vote has taken place since 2002. The latest proposed legislation would not be binding and is unlikely to be taken up by a Republican-controlled House that has batted away attempts at authorization votes, and would be loath to put President Trump in the crosshairs of a war debate.

Jones said he wants to spark a new debate and pointed to the Iraq invasion in 2003 under President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, Trump’s Tomahawk cruise missile strikes on Syria, and President Barack Obama’s operations in Libya as reasons to worry. “I think that Bush and Cheney should have been impeached, quite frankly, that’s one example. I think any president that sends a young man or woman to an area of the world without coming to Congress and we lose a troop who has been shot and killed, yes, I think Congress was bypassed,” Jones said. “What we are saying to a president is you come to Congress let us help you make the decision by debating and voting.”

https:// www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/walter-jones-tulsi-gabbard-say-undeclared-war-should-be-impeachable-offense

>>2200702

Last bread was quite interesting, too many shills.

>>2200747

Indeed they do.

>>2200778

>>2200789

Exactly! They want all on board with the idea.