dChan
Anonymous ID: 98e585 Nov. 17, 2024, 7:34 a.m. No.22003040   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>22003022

This IS the BEST thing we'll ever hear. Musk can reveal all Congress and Senate on the contracts giving out from the government and find the waste and abuse! And Revealing congressman and senators gave them out to!

Anonymous ID: 98e585 Nov. 17, 2024, 8:09 a.m. No.22003203   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3239 >>3360 >>3385 >>3410 >>3466 >>3474 >>3524 >>3591

>>22002103 American Thinker: May the Force be With UsPN

The Revolution of 2024

BY JEFFREY A. TUCKER NOVEMBER 16, 2024

1/3So important to read

 

People are out and about, smiling at each other. It’s been true since the morning after the election, the results of which defied every prediction. Who doesn’t like to see the smug elites who have ruled the world for five awful years taken down a peg?

 

More than that, there are hints of a return to sanity. Mainstream advertisers are suddenly returning to X, putting their economic interest above their tribalist loyalties. The editor of pro-lockdowns Scientific American, which had long blessed totalitarian measures as true science, has resigned.

 

The attempt to pillage InfoWarsand give it to The Onion has been reversed by a federal judge. That might be a fluke or might not be: maybe the lawfare is dialing back too.The cabinet of the incoming administration is being filled by voicesthat were fully censored for years. Employees are reportedly packing their bags at the FDA and other agencies.

 

Mainstream news commentators are sputtering aroundwith less bravado than they have shown in years.CNN is firingmajor personalities.

 

Trump is talking about abolishing the income taxand granting $10K in tax credits per homeschooled child,not to mention blowing up college accreditation systems, among other sweeping changes.

 

The American Bastille day is coming, not only freeing the political prisonersof January 6 but also many of the unjustly persecuted including Ross Ulbricht, Roger Ver, and Ian Freeman, among so many others. That will be a day of rejoicing.

 

Oh, andpeace seems to have broken outin some contentious areas of the world, for now.

 

What is happening?This is not the usual transfer of the resident of the White House.This is starting to look like an actual transfer of power, not just from Biden to Trump but from the permanent government – ensconced in many sectors – that has been long in hiding to an entirely new form of government responsive to actual voters.

 

As it turns out,there was no late surge for Kamala Harris. All the polls were wrong, and the rest was media blather. What was correct were the betting odds on Polymarket, and only days later, the FBI raided the 26-year-old founder’s home and confiscated his phone and laptop.

 

There are still many millions of missing voters, people who supposedly showed up for Biden in 2020 but stayed home this time. Meanwhile,there has been a historic shift in all races, ethnicities, and regions, with even the possibilityof flipping California from blue to red in the future.

 

After decades of academic slicing and dicing of the population according to ever more eccentric identity buckets involving race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual interest, along with countless thousands of studies documenting deep complexity over intersectionality,the driving force of the election was simplre: class, and the few intellectuals and some wealthy entrepreneurs who understand that.

 

The division was not really left vs right. It was workers vs laptoppers, wage earners vs six-figure stay-at-homers, bottom half vs top 5 percent, people with actual skills vs weaponized resume wielders, and those with affection for old-world values vs those whose educations have beaten it out of them for purposes of career advancement.

 

The silent majority has never been so suddenly loud. It just so happened that the heavily privileged had come to inhabit easily identifiable sectors of American society and, in the end, had no choice but hitch the whole of the overclass wagon to the fortunes of a candidate like themselves (Kamala) but who was unable to pull off a compelling masquerade. Not even a parade of well-paid celebrity endorsements could save her from total rebuke at the polls.

 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-revolution-of-2024/

Anonymous ID: 98e585 Nov. 17, 2024, 9:24 a.m. No.22003492   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>22003470

How the Republican David Beat the Democrat Goliath. Part Two

Nov. 15, 2024 Victor Davis Hanson

 

Money

Harris and her PACs supposedly outraisedtheir Trump counterparts byabout $1 billion and spent that huge sum in little over 100 days. Would that not ensure Trump was crushed under a landslide of ads and commercials?

 

Not necessarily. What if the commercials for Harris were both more costly and worse? What if a campaign flush with someone else’s money spends it foolishly and quickly as did Harris? What if $300 million of finely tuned commercials can saturate a mere seven states as effectively as $600 million of “white dude” and “real men” absurd televised appeals? Does it hurt or help a candidate to buy over five hours some six airings of the same terrible commercials?

 

If you are remodeling a small 1,000-square-foot house, does a $5 million improvement look any different than a $200,000 one? So how many hundreds of millions can you cram intoan election decided by a mere seven swing states?

 

If one candidate does ten more public town halls, press conferences, or interviews than another, does not that nonstop exposure save millions of dollars in paid publicity? Can the lesser funded candidate make up with sheer energy,mostly free rallies, and covering more ground what he lacks in paid commercials or huge staffs?

 

Are brags thatHarris had raised a billion dollarsmore than Trump through her vast networks of PACs a sign of her competence, her momentum, her future success—or proof enough that a leftwing Democrat is the pawnof the unpopular billionaire California tech class?

 

Ground game?

Was it wiser to hire out sympathetic fellow travelers who rounded up voters in part for the “cause” and at cheaper costs than to simply pay out campaign workers to show up at people’s houses?

 

In general, a lower-paid zealot who has previously vote harvested or believes he can change an election by registering more votersis a superior investmentto functionary campaign workers while even he is paid a lower wage.

 

Is it wiser to get people to vote by mail and early in toto, or to refine such nontraditional balloting by using the available weeks mostly to focus on andtarget low propensity voterswhile assuming high propensity voters would take care of themselves and turn up on their own?

 

So, was there one sort of targeted early voters and yet another sort as well, and conflating the two diluted the effort?

 

And was part of Harris’s problem that its supposedly smug, young, hip, tech-savvy supporters without evidence were assumed to be more up on gadgetry, electronics, and internet modeling while the deplorable Trumpsters were deemed Neanderthals in comparison—when in fact the Trump people were far more sophisticated in the way they identified persuadable, swing voters and ensured the entire base voted?

 

So how did Trump beat the overfunded Harris?He proved the more sophisticated in registering voters, getting out the mail-in and early vote,maximizing free publicity, covering more ground, using money more effectively, and garnering more high-exposure interviews—but all in an effort to advance a middle-class agenda far more attuned to the needs of a damaged and hurting middle class mostly ignored by Harris and the new elite and progressive Democratic party.

 

https://victorhanson.com/how-the-republican-david-beat-the-democrat-goliath-part-two/