How exactly can the CA SCOTUS block referendum that's been demanded by enough of the state population to make it on the ballot to begin with?
I'm reasonably sure that's a UN human rights violation. I could be wrong as I don't even begin to know where to verify that last statement but, still… what hte literal fuck?
That's been posted a few times already, and shot down every time as a shill-hack attempt at selling some thumb drives.
Were it from a more credible source (preferably multiple) maybe - but as it stands, no.
>>>2202435 (You)
>I guess you don't realize it also has to be approved by the US Government as well.
That doesn't answer the question - it can still be voted on, indeed must be by the state constituents, to reach the level to make the request of the Fed. Govt.
CA SCOTUS does not have the authority to block 'any' vote frankly. Legislation from the bench much?
fuck all
CA's supreme court - as well as the entire 9th Federal Court - sees whatever their politics leads them to think they should see.
If you're not interested in discussion and questioning clear over reach, then kindly go fuck yourself shill - because you're clearly not here to contribute. Rather just make blanket statements, shout about 'go look it up' and such, without providing a single iota of actual evidence yourself.
First filter of the day - and given recent clear shills, that's notable.
Didn't say it was likely, nor that it would even pass the vote.
Dont you agree however, that it's pretty questionable that their SC would even bother to block it?
That's the opponents view, yes.
But that view is based on the notion that a vote to dissolve a constitution cannot be initiated as a ballot initiative - essentially, it cannot be from a grass roots (by the people) push. That in itself is inherently an unconstitutional point of view as a government will never vote to dissolve itself and the government exists to serve the people - not the inverse, as the opposition viewpoint suggests.
I maintain my position as solidly as before - and
oh
and your reply wasn't taken as shilly, you're arguing a position based upon at least some level of reasoning. The blocked pusnuts was just being a braying donkey.
>>>2202481 (You)
>I guess you don't remember a district judge blocked Potus EO, time and time again.
and once it reached the US SCOTUS what happened?
That's yet another example of legislation from the bench.
Additional sauce not necessarily required when the related article is available directly from MSNBC and it covers the identical info. A link for a vid would be preferred - and appeciated - but not explicitly required IMO.
https:// via.hypothes.is/https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/exclusive-apple-google-cashed-pizzagate-offshoot-conspiracy-app-n891726
those 3 seperate states will eventually diverge - and likely faster than most think - in ideology.
There's actually a sizable portion of the state that 'is' conservative. They are just held hostage by the extreme population centers (although splitting may just continue this)
ebot who is Q
Make that 3, possibly 4 depending on how you tally it. My wife and I watched it as well.
Uploaded yesterday. I would assume that the MSNBC link will be up before this evening - at least by someone.
bitching about being handed shit on a silver platter when you're too lazy to look yourself indicates you don't belong here.
This is fucking NBC. Multiple people watched it earlier and the link 'did' work, however it couldn't be viewed over SSL (https for douche-shills such as yourself)
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/exclusive-apple-google-cashed-pizzagate-offshoot-conspiracy-app-n891726
Now, like the previous slidefag, welcome to filter, slidefag.
If you're too fucking lazy to open google or bing or whatever it is you CIA faggots use, then I'm done with you.