Anonymous ID: 9a8b6c Nov. 21, 2024, 6:08 a.m. No.22030822   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0838 >>0847 >>0850 >>0851 >>0939 >>0963 >>0974 >>0979 >>1316

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2024/11/20/watch-dem-rep-jasmine-crockett-goes-nuts-during-hearing-starts-shouting-about-the-white-man-n2182253

 

RACIST: Rep. Jasmine Crockett: "There has been no oppression for the white man in this country … it is white men on this side of the aisle telling us, people of color on this side of the aisle, that y'all are the ones being oppressed."

 

1:32 PM · Nov 20, 2024

·

429.2K

Views

 

https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1859303723882913921

Anonymous ID: 9a8b6c Nov. 21, 2024, 6:11 a.m. No.22030838   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0979 >>1316

>>22030822

There is an old saw that, in America, every great cause begins as a movement and eventually degenerates into a racket. This is certainly true of the past decade’s most fashionable cause: “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” What might have begun as a social movement has now become a business—and not just in the United States. According to McKinsey & Company, spending on “DEI-related efforts” across the globe totaled $7.5 billion in 2020. If trends continue, that figure will exceed $15 billion by 2026.

And, in another American tradition, government contractors have turned a profit on this fad. While it’s hard to determine the precise amount of money that Washington spends on DEI, a search for contracts, grants, and other outlays that reference “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and similar terms suggests that DEI principles were attached to more than $1 billion in federal contracts last year.

This represents a rapid change. In 2019, according to our search, the federal government awarded only $27 million in contracts with language related to “diversity and inclusion.” But after the death of George Floyd in 2020, the federal government and private contractors went all-in on DEI, seeking to implement the Biden administration’s “whole-of-government” equity agenda.

In a series of executive orders beginning in January 2021, Biden unveiled that agenda. The White House directed each federal agency to “implement or increase the availability of [DEI] training programs,” create “internal policies and procedures to support” employees “transitioning” to another gender, submit annual DEI plans and reports to a White House steering committee, establish “agency equity teams,” and appoint a “chief diversity officer” to oversee compliance. These directives created a sudden demand for DEI consulting and opened the floodgates of federal funding to private contractors who offered “expert” advice on diversity-program management. Consulting firms were delighted; they set about rationalizing and marketing a respectable front for both the ideology and their own cash grab.

The large consulting firms advertised the adoption of DEI as a moral imperative. They boasted of their spending on diversity to demonstrate their credentials. Deloitte, for example, claimed to have spent $1.47 billion on “diverse suppliers.” McKinsey committed to doubling spending on such suppliers, while investing $20 million in DEI research. Deloitte, meantime, published a report titled The Equity Imperative, which encouraged “businesses [to] take the lead in dismantling” systemic racism—preferably with Deloitte’s “premier cross-enterprise DEI analytics tool.”

These firms argued simultaneously that DEI was morally necessary and good for the bottom line. McKinsey published studies that claimed to have found economic benefits from diversity policies. Incredibly, it claimed that narrowing the “gender gap” would add $12 trillion to GDP. Economists have shown that these studies are misleading and potentially fallacious.

 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/dei-cash-cow

Anonymous ID: 9a8b6c Nov. 21, 2024, 6:18 a.m. No.22030862   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Pelosi’s daughter is an observer, making sure the curing of ballots is going smoothly and allegedly honestly.

Curing ballots means looking at absentee or provisional ballots and ensuring all the information is on them.

Also, if the signature doesn’t match, they find ways to correct it. If a person goes to the poll without a voter ID, they check to ensure the vote is counted.

A state election worker might find the signature on an absentee ballot doesn’t match the one the election office has on file. A voter who shows up at the polls without the proper photo ID may fill out a provisional ballot that won’t be counted until you present the right ID to the elections office.

They are all getting counted, and they mostly go to Kamala.

California is still counting, and the people they have curing are people like Nancy Pelosi’s daughter and her friends.

Two weeks after the election, California’s elections are all tilting Democrat. The red elections that were Red during the election are now blue. Donald Trump is only 1.5% ahead of Kamala, after being much further ahead.

 

https://www.independentsentinel.com/california-is-still-counting-pelosis-daughter-is-making-sure-its-done-right/

Anonymous ID: 9a8b6c Nov. 21, 2024, 6:23 a.m. No.22030881   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0979 >>1316

By John Solomon and Steven Richards

Published: November 20, 2024 11:00pm

Updated: November 20, 2024 11:59pm

The Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt during the Jan. 6 riots and then was promoted has a lengthy internal affairs and disciplinary record that includes firearm-related incidents, a sweeping congressional investigation has found.

The issues in Captain Michael Byrd's background included a failed shotgun qualification test, a failed FBI background check for a weapon's purchase, a 33-day suspension for a lost weapon and referral to Maryland state prosecutors for firing his gun at a stolen car fleeing his neighborhood, according to congressional and police documents obtained by Just the News.

Byrd’s record was uncovered during a larger House Administration Oversight Subcommittee investigation into the Capitol Police disciplinary process and was chronicled in a letter Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., the panel's chairman, sent Wednesday to the department's chief, Thomas Manger, in which the lawmaker expressed concerns about the officer’s promotion to captain.

“This Subcommittee is dedicated to ensuring USCP has autonomy from political pressures so it can make operational and personnel decisions,” Loudermilk wrote in the letter. “However, based on the information obtained by the Subcommittee regarding USCP’s handling of Captain Byrd following January 6, 2021, and his significant disciplinary history, I have concerns about USCP’s decision to promote him to the rank of Captain.”

You can read the letter below: List of incidents:

11.20.2024 Letter From Rep. Barry Loudermilk to USCP Chief of Police Manger.pdf

The incidents described in Loudermilk's letter are corroborated by congressional records and police reports that date as early as 2004 including:

A 2004 incident where Byrd, who was off duty, fired his weapon at a stolen vehicle as it was fleeing his residential neighborhood;

A 2015 "conduct unbecoming an officer" complaint filed by a fellow officer after Byrd, again off duty, confronted him while the officer was working at a high school football game in an incident with racial overtones;

A 33-day suspension in 2019 after Byrd left his service weapon unattended in a public Capitol Hill bathroom;

A failure to pass a routine background check shortly after Jan. 6 when attempting to purchase a shotgun for home protection, after the USCP worked to provide Byrd a department-issued shotgun instead, he failed the training; and

Three further referrals to the Capitol Police Office of Professional Responsibility for which records are reportedly missing.

 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/hldcop-who-shot-j6-protestor-has-lengthy-disciplinary-record-mishandled-firearms