Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 1:35 p.m. No.22033430   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3470 >>4043

Guess who gave their opinion, when no one asked, is this guy suicidal? He looks pretty worried in that picture. Flood the zone with Milley Memes

 

Mark Milley disagrees with Trump pick on women in combat. The retired chair of the joint chiefs of staff notes that women have long played a role on the battlefield.

By CONNOR O’BRIEN and JACK DETSCH 11/20/2024, 7:00PM ET

 

Retired Army Gen. Mark Milley, the former chair of the joint chiefs of staff, is defending the role of women in combat — clashing with the views of Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Pentagon.

 

Milley, who served as the top U.S. military officer under Trump and President Joe Biden until his retirement in 2023, said at an event Wednesday that women have served in battle throughout history.

 

And he pointedly recalled the service of an Army nurse who braved minefields to save fellow service members and was killed in action.“Don’t lecture me about women in combat,”Milley said at a national security innovation event hosted by the Pallas Foundation. “Women have been in combat, and it doesn't matter if that 7.62 [caliber round] hits you in the chest. No one gives a shit if it's a woman or a guy to pull that trigger, you're still dead.”

 

His remarks come after Pete Hegseth, an Army National Guard veteran and Fox TV host nominated by Trump to be defense secretary, faced public criticism for saying women should not serve in combat.

 

Milley was elevated to the U.S. military’s top job by Trump in 2019 but has since been sharply critical of him. He described the now president-elect as “fascist to the core” in a book by journalist Bob Woodward.

 

Trump and Hegseth have been sharply critical of the military and what they call “woke generals.” Milley, who did not specifically mention the nominee during the event, made it clear to the audience that he views the military as a meritocracy.

 

“If you meet the standards, our military must be, and always should be, a standards-based, merit-based military period, full stop,” he said.(You assholes reduced the standards for many years to the point you have a bunch of fags, and incompetents, and whiners like you.)

 

Women have been allowed to serve in frontline combat roles since 2015, when then-U.S. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter ordered the U.S. military to open all jobs to women.Hegseth, who said the inclusion of women in combat units has “made fighting more complicated,” has argued that women can still serve, just not in jobs such as armor, artillery, infantry or in the special operations community.

 

Milley’s remarks come after the U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters traveling with him in Laos earlier Wednesday that the military should not take women out of frontline combat roles.

 

“I think our women add significant value to the United States military and we should never change that,” Austin said, adding that his message to women in uniform was that “ we need you, we have faith in you, we are appreciative of your service, and you add value to the finest and most lethal fighting force on Earth.” (Austin is intentionally insinuating that Trump or Hegseth don't appreciate women, its women in jobs they don't have the physical power adn skillsets of men. No one is trying to get rid of women altogether.)

 

Milley was also pressed on whether the U.S. would continue to be a reliable international partner under Trump. Trump has often questioned the value of longstanding alliances such as NATO. Milley predicted a “retraction” in U.S. military engagement abroad over the long term, but stopped short of saying the U.S. is drifting to isolationism.

 

"I wouldn't say we're going to be isolationists,” Milley said. “I wouldn't go that far, but there's a probability that there'll be some sort of retraction over time — this isn't going to be instant — over time, of US military forces overseas."

 

Milley sidestepped questionsabout whether reports the incomingadministration could create a "warrior board" of retired military officers to review sitting generals and admiralsor attempt to court martial officers would have a chilling effect on the force or recruitment.

 

"I would imagine right now that there's probably some eyebrows being raised in the Pentagon or out in units. I don't think they're obsessed with it, to tell you the truth, because they don't know what it means,” Milley said. “They don't know what it consists of. No one has actually laid any of this stuff out."

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/11/20/congress/women-in-combat-00190790

 

(His arrogance is his downfall, he really thinks he’s protected,he’s an example of an exceptional traitor to America, because he doesn’t know when to shut to fuck up.)

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 1:49 p.m. No.22033511   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3921 >>3932 >>4043

Nikki (Hag) Haley has thoughts on RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard

The former UN ambassador offers a harsh assessment.

NATALIE ALLISON 11/20/2024, 5:52PM ET

 

Nikki Haley has a blunt assessment of Donald Trump’s choices of Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for high-profile roles in his administration. (Once again, no one asked for it!)

 

Haley, who was Trump’s most significant Republican primary opponent, argued Wednesday on her radio show against confirming Gabbard as director of national intelligence and Kennedy to lead Health and Human Services.

 

Haley first went after Gabbard, a former Democratic member of Congress and 2020 presidential candidate who endorsed Trump this year before announcing she was a Republican. The nomination has also raised concerns from some traditional GOP foreign policy thinkers.

 

“She opposed ending the Iran nuclear deal. She opposed sanctions on Iran. She opposed designating the Iran military as terrorists who say death to America every single day,” Haley said on SiriusXM’sNikki Haley Live. “She said that Donald Trump turned the U.S. into Saudi Arabia's prostitute. This is going to be the future head of our national intelligence.”

 

Haley added that it was “disgusting” that Gabbard, a military veteran, went to Syria in 2017 “for a photo op with Bashar al-Assad" while he was attacking his own people and has expressed skepticism that the dictator was behind chemical attacks on his own people.Haley said DNI was “not a place for a Russian, Iranian, Syrian, Chinese sympathizer.” (All lies, Tulsi should sue her for defamation)

 

On Kennedy, Haley argued that he is “not a health guy,” despite having spent years raising concerns about the food, medicines and vaccines available to American consumers. He should face “hard questions” from senators, she said.

 

“He's a liberal Democrat, environmental attorney trial lawyer who will now be overseeing 25 percent of our federal budget and has no background in healthcare,” Haley said. “So some of you may think RFK is cool, some of you may like that he questions what's in our food and what's in our vaccines, but we don't know, when he is given reins to an agency, what decisions he's going to make behind the scenes.”

 

Trump earlier this month announced that he won’t be asking Haley, his former U.N. ambassador, to serve in his second administration.

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/11/20/congress/nikki-haleys-view-00190765

 

(She couldn’t have hide the inner hag. What is it with these coven witches, like Kamattack and her, always using their fingers and hands?)

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 2:15 p.m. No.22033686   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3695 >>4043

Republicans plot rule-busting plans for next year

The GOP-controlled Congress is poised to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn Biden administration rules.

KELSEY BRUGGER 11/20/2024, 2:37PM ET

 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell declaredTuesday that Republicans are plotting touse the Congressional Review Act to kill Biden administration rules.

 

The Kentucky Republican, who's stepping down from his leadership post at the end of the year, said the incoming Senate majoritywas preparing to use the CRA "to rein in Washington bureaucrats' expensive interpretation of the powers over working Americans."

 

"Under the Biden administration, Democrats have worked relentlessly to resurrect the Obama administration's regulatory regime," he said, "from student loan socialism to job-killing energy policies to blatant infringements on property rights."

 

The CRA allows Congress to undo rules issued within a certain amount of time. Only simple majority votes are required in the House and Senate, and the president's signature. A number of recently issued rules or upcoming Biden administration actions are vulnerable.

 

Vivek Ramaswamy, who's helping lead a government efficiency task force for President-elect Donald Trump, offered a "friendly reminder" to Congress on the CRA on social media.

 

"The Congressional Review Act allows the House & Senate to 'fast track' a joint resolution rejecting federal regulations within 60 session-days of a regulation being finalized," he wrote. "This process has been successfully used >20 times, including 16 times at the start of Pres. Trump's first term to rescind Obama-era regulations."

 

In 2017, with a new governing "trifecta,"Republicans undid more than a dozen Obama regulations, including a coal mining pollution rule.

 

On social media, Ramaswamy added: "We can’t just complain anymore. Now that we’re back in power, it’s time to act."

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/11/20/congress/congressional-review-act-mitch-mcconnell-00190689

 

(That’s great, I’m glad Mitch did this)

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 3:09 p.m. No.22034047   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4053 >>4058

Judge Rules MSNBC Pundit Potentially Defamed Trump Attorney

By: Tristan Justice November 20, 2024

 

A federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled an online claim made by a legal analyst at MSNBC against a former White House attorney in the Trump administration is potentially defamatory. In September, U.S. District CourtJudge Loren AliKhan denied a motionfrom MSNBC legal analyst and attorney Andrew Weissmannto dismissa complaint filed by Stefan Passantino, who represented former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson before she became the Jan. 6 Committee’s star witness.

 

Passantino had previously served as head deputy ethics counsel in the Trump White House and was Hutchinson’s attorney when she was initially questioned by the House Democrats’ Soviet-style inquisition run by then-Wyoming Rep.

Liz Cheney.Hutchinson fired Passantino, who was being paid by the Save America PAC, when she decided to change her testimony before the House committee and make a series of outlandish claims immediately discredited by her own named sources.

 

Passantino sued Weissmann last year after the former deputy to Special Counsel Robert Mueller claimed the Trump-world attorney “coached her to lie.” “This is an insidious lie,” Passantino’s lawsuit reads. “Ms. Hutchinson even testified, under penalty of law: ‘I want to make this clear to you: Stefan [Passantino] never told me to lie. … He told me not to lie.”

 

Hutchinson’s testimony can be found on page 42 of the publicly available transcript from her Sept. 14, 2022, interview with the Jan. 6 Committee. Passantino, instead, coached her as a standard fact witness to only answer questions she could recall. None of the transcripts dated Feb. 23, 2022, March 7, 2022, or May 17, 2022, show Passantino obstructing Hutchinson’s testimony.

While the transcripts were also recorded, the Jan. 6 Committee destroyed the video.

Weissmann, however, charged Passantino with “coach[ing] her to lie” in a post to roughly 320,000 followers on X after CNN published a series of hit pieces that accused Passantinoof pressuring Hutchinson to illegally manipulate her testimony.

• On Dec. 21, 2022, CNN ran the first hit piece, which cited “sources familiar with the committee’s work” who alleged Passantino urged Hutchinson to mislead lawmakers. The network included a statement from Passantino, but made no reference to the transcript of Hutchinson’s Sept. 14 interview, in which she explicitly said he told her “not to lie.”

• CNN ran another story on Dec. 22, 2022, this one headlined “Cassidy Hutchinson told the January 6 committee she felt pressure from Trump allies not to talk and instead risk ‘contempt.’”

• “The final straw for former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson with her first attorney, paid through allies of former President Donald Trump, came when he told her to stop cooperating with the January 6 House select committee even if she risked a contempt of Congress charge, transcripts of her interviews and sources familiar with her testimony tell CNN,” the network reported.

• The second story did link to Hutchinson’s nearly 140-page Sept. 14, 2022, transcript, which was embedded on the network’s website, andreported on her testimony that she was explicitly coached “not to lie”halfway through the story. A recent report from House Republicans investigating the Jan. 6 Committee in October found that Hutchinson was communicating directly with Cheney without Passantino’s knowledge throughout his representation of her.

 

Three months after CNN’s stories were published and six months before Weissmann’s potentially defamatory post on X, theNew York Times reported on “several dozen prominent legal figures, including past presidents of the American Bar Association and the District of Columbia Bar,” trying to revoke Passantino’s law license.“In a 22-page complaint filed on Monday with D.C.’s Board on Professional Responsibility, prominent lawyers accused Mr. Passantino of the crimes of subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and bribery,” the Times reported.

 

Passantino became the target of another bar complaint, this one brought in Georgia by a group called the “65 Project,” which was expressly established to intimidate attorneys into not working for Republicans.Both the State Bar of Georgia and D.C. ethics watchdogs dismissed the complaints against Passantinoby the end of March.

 

In October, Passantino filed bar complaints of his own against Cheney and the director of the 65 Project through America First Legal.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/20/judge-rules-msnbc-pundit-potentially-defamed-trump-attorney/

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 3:12 p.m. No.22034074   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Citizen Free Press

@CitizenFreePres

 

Patrick Bet David–Trump defeated Obama for the second time.

 

From George

12:15 AM · Nov 21, 2024

·80.4K Views

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1859465719299154348

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 3:17 p.m. No.22034112   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4120 >>4127 >>4152

Babylon Bee

Post-Menopausal Lesbians Flee America Over Concerns About Forced Pregnancies

 

LONDON — A pair of post-menopausal lesbians announced they had fled the United States over concerns about forced pregnancies.Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi revealed that they had taken refuge in the serene English countryside where they could be free from being forced to carry babies to term.

 

"No one's forcing me to have a baby," Ellen said of her decision to leave the United States. "Okay, sure, I can't have one for biological reasons — and I'm a lesbian — but still. Hands off my uterus, Trump."

 

England, known for having stricter abortion laws than DeGeneres and Rossi's former home of California, had already helped make them feel safe because J.K. Rowling making Dumbledore gay has made everyone so understanding.

 

"I say, isn't that the Ellen chap from the tele?" local Englishman Theo Underhill was overheard asking his manservant as he spotted the lesbians out for a stroll. "By Jove, I believe it is! Can't get pregnant, you know. Lesbians, that is."

 

Portia de Rossi said it was hard to leave California as an actress who isn't getting any more work, but it was all worth it."I'm just glad no one will force us to be pregnant ever again," she said. "Which is good, even though it's impossible."

 

At publishing time, Degeneres and de Rossi's relationship was called into question for other reasons, including the fact that most people assumed Ellen was a ten-year-old boy whose middle-aged mother was being very inappropriate with him.

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/post-menopausal-lesbians-flee-america-over-concerns-about-forced-pregnancies

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 3:19 p.m. No.22034133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4143 >>4149 >>4154 >>4172

Attendance problems are once again keeping Senate Republicans from blocking the movement and confirmation of Biden judicial appointees.

 

GOP Sens. Ted Cruz (Texas) and Mike Braun (Ind.) missed votes, allowing Senate Democrats to advance the nominationof Amir Ali to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia and confirm Rebecca Pennell as U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington. Both advanced 50-48, with independent Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) opposing Pennell and independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.) voting against advancing Ali’s nomination.

 

Vice President Kamala Harris is currently in Hawaii, making her unavailable to break ties. Senators could revote on the nominees again at a later date in the event of a tie.

 

Anthony Adragna

11/20/2024, 2:04pm ET

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/11/20/congress/senate-judges-update-00190683

Anonymous ID: 537969 Nov. 21, 2024, 3:22 p.m. No.22034165   🗄️.is 🔗kun

‘Gutfeld!’: Why was Biden in such a hurry?

 

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the panel say the majority of Americans approve of President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet picks on ‘Gutfeld!’

 

15:07

 

https://youtu.be/rDuFQUrk6pg