Anonymous ID: 8b87eb Nov. 22, 2024, 5:38 a.m. No.22037179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7190

22 Q Drops today

 

Any of you re-read them or 80% of this Bad Bread namefags, 15% bots and shills, 5% Lurkers, Diggers, Meme-Makers, & news posters?

 

#195 & 194

 

Are duplicates mentioning Uranium-1 and the process to make it to Iran/NK

>>22037124 You have to be a bot

 

>>22037148 lol, Q did, re-read the Q posts, there are some relevant ones today…

 

George Washington wrote a letter about the illuminati infiltrating the Freemason Lodges

Mass Psychosis in the form of TV, Radio, Music, News

Puppets on TV

Circumcision

Read the bible

Federal Reserve

Operation Mockingbird

Operation Paperclip (nazis)

Bolshevik Migration before collapse of USSR

Operation Mockingbird

Mass psychosis

Slaves

Now technological leap and control systems developed, they want another mass depopulation event.. even after their jabs(which Q talks about…)

Three sides to the pyramid…

which Q talks about, Q Deltas.. today

Anonymous ID: 8b87eb Nov. 22, 2024, 5:47 a.m. No.22037216   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7228

>>22037190

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Nov%2022

Read the Qrumbs, you brainwashed yourself reading this dribble and not the Q drops

 

U1 - CA - EU - ASIA - IRAN/NK

Where did it end up?

The uranium from the Uranium One deal likely ended up in Russia, and the Iran deal aimed to ensure Iran’s nuclear program was curtailed while lifting sanctions.

 

What was the purpose?

The Uranium One deal served Russian interests in uranium mining, while the Iran deal aimed to limit Iran's nuclear weapons potential.

 

Who was supposed to win the election of 2016?

Hillary Clinton was expected to win, but Donald Trump’s unexpected victory raised questions about electoral interference.

 

Why was the Iran deal kept from Congress and placed at the highest level of classification?

The deal was classified to maintain diplomatic leverage and avoid political backlash, with some believing it hid details from scrutiny.

 

Meaning, a United States Senator could NOT review the deal but other foreign powers could.

The deal was selectively classified to protect negotiations, allowing foreign powers like Iran to access it, but not U.S. lawmakers in full.

 

How much money was hand-delivered by plane(s)?

$400 million was delivered to Iran in cash as part of a larger settlement for military equipment, critics calling it a "ransom" payment.

 

Why in cash?

Cash was delivered due to U.S. sanctions on Iran that prohibited direct banking transactions.

 

Where did the plane(s) actually land?

The planes landed in Geneva before the cash was transferred to Iran.

 

What was the cover?

The cash transfer was framed as a settlement of a long-standing dispute over military equipment owed to Iran.

 

Who paid for BO (Barack Obama) to attend Harvard?

Obama’s Harvard education was funded through financial aid, scholarships, and potentially money laundering networks.

 

Why would this occur pre-political days?

Pre-political financial backing for Obama suggests manipulation to position him for future political power.

 

Who was the biggest contributor to the Clinton Foundation (CF)?

Foreign governments and organizations, especially those with ties to countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, were major contributors.

 

The graphic is the key.

The "graphic" likely represents a hidden visual connection between financial flows, political agendas, and international influence.

 

Why does the MSM push conspiracy without investigation?

The MSM often sensationalizes stories for ratings, bias, or political influence, ignoring deeper investigations into controversial claims.

 

Who controls the MSM?

Large corporations and wealthy individuals control the MSM, which shapes narratives that serve their interests.

 

What does the word 'conspiracy' mean to you?

"Conspiracy" refers to a secretive, harmful plot by influential groups, often used to dismiss alternative political narratives.

 

Has the word 'conspiracy' been branded to mean something shameful in today's society?

Yes, it’s been stigmatized to discredit ideas that challenge the official narrative, even when there may be truth behind them.

 

The world cannot handle the truth. This pill cannot be swallowed by most.

Exposing uncomfortable truths about political or global issues is often too difficult for the public to accept.

 

Risk in painting this picture.

Revealing controversial truths often leads to personal, professional, and societal risks, with those who expose them facing suppression.

 

THE SUM OF ALL FEARS.

This refers to the potential catastrophic consequences of hidden political agendas, including nuclear conflict, as foreshadowed by predictive programming.

Anonymous ID: 8b87eb Nov. 22, 2024, 5:49 a.m. No.22037225   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22037201

Qatar has ties to Clinton Foundation also

 

Qatar has been reported as one of the significant donors to the Clinton Foundation, particularly during the time when Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State (2009-2013). The donations raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as Qatar is a wealthy Gulf state with considerable geopolitical influence. The Clinton Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to global health, economic development, and climate change, has faced scrutiny over the large financial contributions it received from foreign governments and individuals while Clinton was in public office.

 

Key Points about Qatar's Donations:

Financial Contributions: Qatar reportedly donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation. The exact amount and nature of these contributions are not always clearly disclosed, but they are part of a larger pattern where foreign governments, including Qatar, made significant donations to the Foundation.

 

Geopolitical Implications: Qatar, as a key U.S. ally in the Middle East, particularly in relation to military and diplomatic cooperation, had interests in U.S. foreign policy, especially in the region. The timing of these donations raised concerns about the potential influence foreign governments could exert on U.S. policy decisions through their financial support to the Foundation.

 

The Clinton Foundation’s Response: In response to criticisms about potential conflicts of interest, the Clinton Foundation stated that it had always disclosed its donors and that all donations were used for charitable purposes. However, the Foundation’s critics argue that these large donations might have been made to gain access or favor with the U.S. government, particularly given Hillary Clinton’s position as Secretary of State.

 

The Foundation’s Pledge Post-2016 Election: After Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, the Clinton Foundation announced it would scale back its operations and not accept new donations from foreign governments like Qatar if she had won the presidency. This was seen as an effort to avoid the appearance of any conflict of interest during her potential presidency.

 

Transparency and Accountability Concerns: The flow of donations to the Clinton Foundation from foreign governments like Qatar was scrutinized in the context of "pay-to-play" allegations, where critics argued that large donors could expect political favors or favorable policy decisions in return for their financial support.

 

While Qatar’s donations to the Clinton Foundation have been publicly acknowledged, the full extent of the influence they may have had on U.S. foreign policy decisions, especially under Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, remains a point of contention and speculation.

Anonymous ID: 8b87eb Nov. 22, 2024, 5:57 a.m. No.22037259   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7273

>>22037228

They aren't meant to be read by 99.9 | 66.6 of society, you couldnt even be bothered to read this part of the post you replied to, but here you are….. just looking at pictures and bitching

 

===

What does the word 'conspiracy' mean to you?

 

"Conspiracy" refers to a secretive, harmful plot by influential groups, often used to dismiss alternative political narratives.

 

Has the word 'conspiracy' been branded to mean something shameful in today's society?

 

Yes, it’s been stigmatized to discredit ideas that challenge the official narrative, even when there may be truth behind them.

 

The world cannot handle the truth. This pill cannot be swallowed by most.

 

Exposing uncomfortable truths about political or global issues is often too difficult for the public to accept.

 

Risk in painting this picture.

 

Revealing controversial truths often leads to personal, professional, and societal risks, with those who expose them facing suppression.

Anonymous ID: 8b87eb Nov. 22, 2024, 6:32 a.m. No.22037401   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22037377

>These are the people that want to send more young american men to their death so they can remain fat, fed, and happy

 

Is American 'foreign policy' the one where children are kidnapped, brought here to be child-brides or sacrifices for the pedo-cabal?