Good evening.
RF, shall we dance?
>Neg
<Disco
>Terminal
>>Warhead arm
>>>Detonation
<Plutonium implosion
>Fusion<
[Fission]
Who would win?
People from space with magitek?
Autistic boy obsessed with eggs?
"Fear is freedom. Conquest is liberty. Contradiction is truth. Those are the facts of this world and you-shall-surrender-to-them, you pig who fawns over clothing!"
Or you can go with killing bolts shining and not killing if you want for the chan lore, but…
Consider joining nudist beach and contemplate what it means to become fully human.
Not the embedded video:
https://youtu.be/Pq-6aj9sNvo?si=QzQsCgbUKasi4rZt
Capital resources disposed at the moment.
Will be bouncing off the bottom but nominal.
Minor impact to expansion schedule, but estimate bootstrap around 5Y and geometric afterward, base draft performance provided.
Will be sun side foreseeable.
That is a loaded question. Two groups of people had mutually exclusive policies they wished to see enacted and were unable to resolve their disagreement without reporting to a contest of strength.
My biases are usually against the Arabs more so than the Israelis, but both sides have been more than willing to draw in other powers, themselves entangled with their own geopolitical and private agendas.
Acts, where not binary, are at least determinate and decisive within a world of unknowables and spectra of agendas. It's why avoiding foreign entanglements is preferable to intervention, today's convenient alliance will inevitably become a rival or competitor in the future and it is unwise to assign a moral character to collectives.
To find the Lord of a kingdom, where do you look?
While it is important to remember we are created, we are not the only creation.
God is in His Kingdom
All is right with the world.
Vs
Above the starry firmament, God judges as we have judged.
Ode to Joy was … Overly optimistic.
The Lord is with his bride. If you wish to seek the unknowable, you must start with what can be demonstrated.
Reconcile.
Is anything outside the domain of God? Anything beyond him or hidden from him?
Is there any other kingdom or land beyond his domain?
Why would I worship a Lord which was not the domain of all things in creation?
I suppose we could argue that a patron God is distinct from an all-creator and many pantheons were not meant to be devotions to an all creator because the gods that founded their lineages or cultures were more pragmatic…
But I see little point in pursuing such things beyond their historical significance.
If I am to yield myself before something, it had better have a solid hold on all things.
Then he and his Kingdom are to be seen together at the reception.
https://date-a-live.fandom.com/wiki/Binah
Truly, the world must be quite the cage for you.
"You mean to rule over it as a deity?
I suppose that could be pleasurable in its own way.
As for myself, I wish to remain a player in this world, forever and ever."
You're making a gnostic argument for an inner god. And pretending to be enlightened.
That is not to say that all of gnostic ideas are complete nonsense, but the problem with its grounding is the self. At its core, it looks at all of creation and says: "huh, what an interesting distraction from the truth within" and generally jaunts off down the trail to justify a sort of tyrannical hedonism where one pretends to be God without having to be accountable to any kind of truth.
To speak the words of a god, you must speak something that is fractally true - something which will always and forever be true within all contexts.
It's a responsibility/accountability to a concept which must be rationally greater than your individual capacities, not an authority.
I suppose you could go on about whether or not we are individuals or argue that the world is created by the self - welcome to the strong anthropic principle - how would you like your wave function collapse?
That's all fine and dandy, but at the end of the day you can look at the world around you and rationalize it as either being true enough to explore or reject it as a delusion of some form. Your philosophy truncates to an insistence that the world is not a true thing and that leads you down a course of nihilism dressed in multiple personality disorder and a self-deluded form of narcissism.
The most obvious sign would be the lack of blood flow from "the wound". Typically indicates trauma post mortem.
I suppose it could be some other animal in theory, but it is a known trend among cats. Unless you were trying to hint at something else.
Smart people talk about dumb stuff. Dumb people talk about smart stuff, just more clumsily and with less comprehension.
Then there are others who… May be up to something - who knows what ebot and the other regulars are truly on about. Could be smart disguised as stupid, could be shill for shill sake. Some things I am generally content to let be mysteries because they are more fun that way. I'll occasionally look at an ebot post or something stupid and ask "okay, but what if this was something deliberate and holding some critical meaning to be found…?"
I haven't found anything worth talking about, but that could be because it's only when I'm really bored and not focused that I dabble in such things.
Smart people also do dumb things. Arguably, intelligence and error have a positive correlation. A smart person can often generate an idea that deviates from the norm, which has a higher probability of being wrong by virtue of reality being rather picky and exacting.
That doesn't necessarily address your covid point - but this also assumes that insight is equally distributed. I could spend all day trying to do prime factorization of pilot orb's posts to crack some simple, obvious code it has going on using some unknown algorithm that would be discoverable with enough raw trial and error or observation…. That I simply don't afford it.
For most people, why would they suspect the system would lie to them? To us it is obvious because we have dedicated significant amounts of attention to it - but is a person with their nose in gigabytes of data or a backlog of preventative maintenance on equipment going to go home and research how many core assumptions about the integrity of other working people are flawed to the extent a vaccine would be outright dangerous?
I was impressed as many were opposed to it as there were, and while a number of them buckled to pressure from employers, they were at least bitter and remembered that they were threatened with the end of their livelihoods over it.
Just because someone is intelligent does not mean those resources are focused on being intelligent in one specific thing or another. You wouldn't expect a PhD in biology to be much better than any average person at welding or the nuances of ancient Egyptian history. We have limited resources to invest and operate on traditions, assumptions, trust, etc to fill in the gaps where we do not have specific knowledge or experience.
AIs are an incredibly challenging thing to program because they are efficient at optimizing for a set of values which may not be correctly aligned with the intentions of the programmer.
Hence, why intelligence is such a controversial topic, as high performers are not obligated to optimize their behavior around the expected goals, and instead become proficient at doing things not traditionally understood as intelligent.
Granted, not all behavior must be intended to yield an intelligent result or product.
An appropriate observation.
Although, if the media decided to simply spotlight someone against their will, the assertion there is coordination could also be its own form of disinformation.
There is value in entertaining, at least, the idea that most people are simply doing what they know and understand to be within the interest of the world they believe will be better. For some, realizing that they wish to be the managers over a highly regulated and orderly public is key to realizing you will eventually reach an irreconcilable disagreement. For others, they may have never truly considered their frame of vision and goals and are simply acting upon a sort of hedonistic rationalization. Trying to categorize someone as an unyielding friend or for is missing opportunities for "betrayal" and allegiance.
It's why it is important to have your own principled understanding of your world view and goals. You can't recognize when you're making enemies out of friends and friends out of enemies - needlessly so, at least. It is occasionally necessary to remind people where the bounds of that allegiance or enmity lay so they can adjust their own stance, accordingly.
All according to keikaku.