tyb
kek
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Jimmy Patronis, Chief Financial Officer for the Great State of Florida, has done a tremendous job as CFO, where he also serves as the State’s Fire Marshall, and as an important member of the Florida Cabinet. I hear that Jimmy is now considering launching a Campaign for Congress in Florida's 1st Congressional District!
A fourth generation Floridian from the beautiful Panhandle, and owner of an iconic seafood restaurant, Jimmy has been a wonderful friend to me, and to MAGA. As your next Congressman, Jimmy would work tirelessly alongside of me to Grow our Economy, Secure our Border, Stop Migrant Crime, Strengthen our Incredible Military/Vets, Restore American Energy DOMINANCE, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment.
Should he decide to enter this Race, Jimmy Patronis has my Complete and Total Endorsement.RUN, JIMMY, RUN!
Nov 25, 2024, 11:28 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113544535456789578
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
These cases, like all of the other cases I have been forced to go through, are empty and lawless, and should never have been brought. Over $100 Million Dollars of Taxpayer Dollars has been wasted in the Democrat Party’s fight against their Political Opponent, ME. Nothing like this has ever happened in our Country before. They have also used State Prosecutors and District Attorneys, such as Fani Willis and her lover, Nathan Wade (who had absolutely zero experience in cases such as this, but was paid MILLIONS, enough for them to take numerous trips and cruises around the globe!), Letitia James, who inappropriately, unethically, and probably illegally, campaigned on “GETTING TRUMP” in order to win Political Office, and Alvin Bragg, who himself never wanted to bring this case against me, but was forced to do so by the Justice Department and the Democrat Party….
Nov 25, 2024, 3:00 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113545366863200868
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
….It was a political hijacking, and a low point in the History of our Country that such a thing could have happened, and yet, I persevered, against all odds, and WON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Nov 25, 2024, 2:59 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113545366414504634
Not many results contains Patronus curse.
Did you mean "Patronis" curse?
https://harrypotter.fandom.comwikiPatronus_Charm
Patronus Charm - Harry Potter Wiki
The Patronus Charm (Expecto Patronum) was the most famous and one of the most powerful defensive charms known to wizardkind.[4] It was an immensely complicated and extremely difficult spell that channelled the caster's positive emotions into a powerful protection. When cast properly, it evoked a partially-tangible positive energy force known as a Patronus (pl. Patronuses)[5] or spirit guardian
https://harrypotterspellscursesandcharms.fandom.comwikiExpecto_Patronum
Expecto Patronum - Harry Potter Spells, Curses and Charms Wiki
Harry's Patronus is a stag, representing his father's animagus form, while Hermione's is an otter and Ron's takes the form of a small Jack Russell Terrier. Harry's stag Patronus. Learning [] Expecto Patronum, the Patronus charm is a very hard spell to learn, especially at a young age. Before you cast the spell, you must think of a happy memory
https://www.harrypotter.comfact-filespellsthe-patronus-charm
The Patronus Charm | Official Harry Potter Encyclopedia
The Patronus Charm is a defensive spell that, if performed correctly, conjures a silvery animal form particular to the user. The charm is used to defend against Dementors - where the witch or wizard summons a guardian to shield them. The Patronus is formed of hope and happiness, so that the Dementor feeds on it rather than the caster.

Dont post at me, I'm not interested.
Your writings are offensive to common sense, utter nonsense.
Fuck back off, too reddit.
Stupid bot.
thumbsup.png
Jack Smith Moves to Dismiss Both Cases Against President Trump after Trump Plans to Go Scorched Earth and Fire His Entire Team of Prosecutors
Jack Smith on Monday moved to dismiss both federal cases against President Trump as Trump plans to go scorched earth and fire the special counsel’s entire team of prosecutors.
Jack Smith asked to dismiss both the January 6 case and classified documents case against President Trump.
In June 2023, Jack Smith indicted Trump on 37 federal counts in Miami for lawfully storing presidential records at his Mar-a-Lago estate which was protected by Secret Service agents.
read further
“Trump is also planning to assemble investigative teams within the Justice Department to hunt for evidence in battleground states that fraud tainted the 2020 election,” WaPo reported.
Jack Smith’s team of taxpayer-funded prosecutors were operating in secret. Smith’s team of lawyers was DOUBLE the size of Mueller’s (Weissmann’s) team.
Mueller had a team of a dozen angry Democrats and Hillary Clinton donors harassing Trump for two years.
President Trump’s DOJ should publicly name and fire every single one of Jack Smith’s prosecutors.
Trump’s senior advisor Steven Cheung released a statement after Jack Smith moved to dismiss both cases against Trump.
NEW: Statement from Trump Communications Director @StevenCheung pic.twitter.com/gC5lzkbuzp
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) November 25, 2024
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/breaking-jack-smith-moves-dismiss-both-cases-against/
Trump War Room
@TrumpWarRoom
NEW: Statement from Trump Communications Director
@StevenCheung
1:50 PM · Nov 25, 2024
https://x.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1861120257986859029
To remove most spam, do this:
Options/Filters/Name: ^(?!(Anonymous$|Q$))
Check regex
Turn red text to black text
Options/Theme/spacebar/enter:
#vrecorder { display:none !important; }
span.heading { color: #000000;}
“Bullsh*t…300 Words of Cleverness Doesn’t Make You a Reporter!” Liberal Axios CEO Loses His Mind Over Elon Musk’s Provocative Media Claim- Musk Responds (VIDEO)
WATCH:
Axios boss Jim Vanderhei is super upset at Elon Musk for stating that X is now the media.
“My message to Elon Musk is bullsh*t — You are not the media.” Oh? pic.twitter.com/gYsFtDUPv6
— Catch Up (@CatchUpFeed) November 25, 2024
VANDERHEI: Everything we do is under fire! Elon Musk sits on Twitter every day saying ‘we are the media’ and’ you are the media.’
My message to Elon Musk is bullsh*t! You’re not the media! You having a blue checkmark, a Twitter handle, and 300 words of cleverness doesn’t make you a reporter! You don’t do that by having an opinion.
You do it by doing the hard work!
MSNBC’s Morning Joe, which showed the clip, predictably slobbered all over Vandehei over his tantrum. But Musk had a different take.
Musk responded to Vanderhei with a wave of the hand and doubled down on his stance that anyone has the power to be a citizen journalist.
“Yeah, whatever, lmao,” Musk wrote. “You are the media now and legacy media know it.”
Yeah, whatever lmao.
You are the media now.
And legacy media know it. https://t.co/TWemmwMoqd
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 25, 2024
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/bullsht-300-words-cleverness-doesnt-make-you-reporter/
Nov 25, 2024, 4:00 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113545605109827019
notable
Jack Smith seeks to dismiss the cases against Trump
They're over.

TECHNO FOG
NOV 25, 2024
Today, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss his criminal cases against President Trump.
In the Washington, D.C. case, where Trump was indicted relating to January 6 and efforts to challenge the 2020 election, Smith “moves for dismissal without prejudice.” The Florida is on appeal after the District Court Judge Aileen Cannon concluded Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional. Special Counsel Smith moves “to dismiss the appeal in this case as to defendant Trump.” The appeal will continue as to the two other defendants (Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira). charged with Trump.
The basis for dismissal? Smith, in consultation with the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), has determined that the Constitution prohibits the prosecution of a sitting President “and that as a result this prosecution must be dismissed before” Trump’s inauguration. Trump’s attorneys did not object to these motions.
As we saw from the election (it seems a lot longer than 20 days ago), the lawfare didn’t work. Special Counsel Smith was both too late and too aggressive.
His approach to the D.C. case – to indict every act of Trump that he could, including those that were undoubtedly official acts as President – backfired spectacularly. After a shortened appeals process which favored Smith, the Supreme Court held that at Trump was immune from prosecution for some of the indicted conduct. See Trump v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 2312, 2335 (2024) (“Trump is therefore absolutely immune from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department officials.”) The case was remanded to the District Court for a determination of whether Trump’s conduct, that which was not “Presidential” or part of the Executive function, qualified as official or unofficial.
This setback proved fatal to Special Counsel Smith’s expedited timeline. He wasn’t going to get Trump to trial before the November 2024 election, despite the best efforts of Judge Tanya Chutkan, who violated Trump’s constitutional rights by granting an early trial date. Had Special Counsel Smith brought the charges sooner, and had he more carefully selected the charges conduct and crimes, Smith might have got his day in Court. And before a D.C. jury, Smith would have secured the conviction.
What happens now? The cases will be dismissed, though Trump’s attorneys will likely request that they be dismissed with prejudice (meaning they can’t be filed again). It’s doubtful that Judge Chutkan in D.C. does Trump any favors.
If the cases are dismissed without prejudice, what happens with the Statute of Limitations? That question, which would be argued if the cases are re-filed, may never be resolved.
Special Counsel Smith has forced Trump’s hand, requiring he pardon himself to spare the potential of prosecutions in 2029. There is no guarantee the Government would restart the cases after Trump’s term – Trump would be 82 years old, and he wouldn’t be the political threat that he was when these cases were filed – but you never know.
Better that Trump pardons himself and saves the trouble. On November 5, 2024, the people gave Trump that right.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/jack-smith-seeks-to-dismiss-the-cases
watching the panic is fascinating
clearly, they have lost all control
the outbursts of angered realizations of their total loss of power, is amusing
these are very bad people who have been doing very bad things for a very long time
God bless Q psyop and all who contribute.
o7
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
Deterrence relies on meaningful public consequences for wrongdoing
Nov 25, 2024, 4:06 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@Rasmussen_Poll/posts/113545627398680130
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
There is something critical people must understand, and absorb it completely. Yes the Jack Smith case and the rest of the lawfare assault against President Trump has been defeated — but only temporarily.
The maniacs who devised the nationwide legal onslaught against President Trump showed themselves to be utterly devoid of basic morals, respect for the Constitution, our norms and traditions, and any sense of fairness or good faith. Most of the perpetrators remain employed, and all the tools remain for them to pick up right where they left off when, not if, they get the opportunity.
Hear me clearly: They will try this again.
That is why those responsible for these desecrations of our Republic MUST be held accountable. Those who coordinated the unprecedented legal assault against President Trump, J6ers, pro-lifers, church-going Catholics and others, must be made an example of. Many should be fired. Others may need to be indicted, perp-walked, and incarcerated. That's not retribution — it's justice. It's what must be done to safeguard America's future for our children. If you attempt to turn our home into a Third World banana republic, you must pay a very heavy price.
Our nation was saved by a historic confluence of miracles, but we will need saving again in the future, and we cannot simply move on this time. The same cretins will regroup, and a line in the sand must be very clearly drawn now.
Never again. Not in America.
Last edited
3:56 PM · Nov 25, 2024
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1861151945681182793
NOVEMBER 25, 2024
Judicial Watch Statement on Jack Smith Moving to Drop Charges Against President Trump

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued the following statement on Special Counsel Jack Smith moving to drop all charges against President Donald Trump:
At last this egregious political persecution comes to an end. This is a good day for the rule of law.
The political decision to seek this dismissal is forced recognition that the American people essentially found President Trump innocent of the political and baseless lawfare charges brought against him by the Democratic Party machine.
The Department of Justice under Joe Biden became a Department of Injustice as it waged lawfare against Donald Trump. Jack Smith’s mission was never anything more than retaliation and election interference at the highest level. The fake charges against Trump were built on sand and about nothing. Judicial Watch and I witnessed firsthand the corruption of Jack Smith’s operation when they forced me to testify for hours before a grand jury over my tweets, election and public policy battles, and what I had for lunch with President Trump.
Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray and all the other shady characters at Justice are no less villainous than their puppet Smith. The FBI and Justice Department (and many other Deep State agencies) are irredeemably corrupt. Indeed, even in seeking dismissal, the Biden regime asks the court to keep the option open to further persecute President Trump when he leaves office!
This unprecedented corruption and abuse of power by the Biden regime and its party allies must now be the subject of a thorough criminal investigation. In the meantime, Judicial Watch will continue to investigate and sue over what has been the worst government corruption in American history.
In his new book Rights and Freedoms in Peril Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton details a long chain of abuses officials and politicians have made against the American people and calls readers to battle for “the soul and survival of America.” The book details how the progressive movement threatens America’s most venerable institutions, undermining the core principles that make this country a beacon of hope to the world.
Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in May 2023 after the Justice Department rejected a December 9, 2022, FOIA request for ”staff rosters, phone lists, or similar records depicting all employees hired by or detailed to the office of Special Counsel Jack Smith.”
In February 2024 the Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.
In May 2024 Judicial Watch asked the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, to declare a default judgment against District Attorney Fani Willis in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit seeking records of communications Willis had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee.
Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Jack Smith previously was at the center of several other controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them.
In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Government officials were looking to step up a probe into requests for tax-exemption from organizations with conservative-sounding names like “Tea Party” and other “political sounding names,” according to a later report by the Treasury Department’s inspector general. Jack Smith appears to have been a key player in this attempt to silence conservative voices.
###
https://www.judicialwatch.org/jack-smith-drop-charges-trump/
JULY 07, 2015
Judicial Watch: New Documents Reveal DOJ, IRS, and FBI Plan to Seek Criminal Charges of Obama Opponents
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new Department of Justice (DOJ) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) documents that include an official “DOJ Recap” report detailing an October 2010 meeting between Lois Lerner, DOJ officials and the FBI to plan for the possible criminal prosecution of targeted nonprofit organizations for alleged illegal political activity.
The newly obtained records also reveal that the Obama DOJ wanted IRS employees who were going to testify to Congress to turn over documents to the DOJ before giving them to Congress. Records also detail how the Obama IRS gave the FBI 21 computer disks, containing 1.25 million pages of confidential IRS returns from 113,000 nonprofit social 501(c)(4) welfare groups – or nearly every 501(c)(4) in the United States – as part of its prosecution effort. According to a letter from then-House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, “This revelation likely means that the IRS – including possibly Lois Lerner – violated federal tax law by transmitting this information to the Justice Department.”
The documents were produced subsequent to court orders in two Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits: Judicial Watch v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:14-cv-01956) and Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:14-cv-01239).
The new IRS documents include a October 11, 2010 “DOJ Recap” memo sent by IRS Exempt Organizations Tax Law Specialist Siri Buller to Lerner and other top IRS officials explaining an October 8 meeting with representatives from the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section and “one representative from the FBI” to discuss the possible criminal prosecution of nonprofit organizations for alleged political activity:
On October 8, 2010, Lois Lerner, Joe Urban [IRS Technical Advisor, TEGE], Judy Kindell [top aide to Lerner], Justin Lowe [Technical Advisor to the Commissioner of Tax-Exempt and Government Entities], and Siri Buller met with the section chief and other attorneys from the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section, and one representative from the FBI, to discuss recent attention to the political activity of exempt organizations.
The section’s attorneys expressed concern that certain section 501(c) organizations are actually political committees “posing” as if they are not subject to FEC law, and therefore may be subject to criminal liability. The attorneys mentioned several possible theories to bring criminal charges under FEC law. In response, Lois and Judy eloquently explained the following points:
Under section 7805(b), we may only revoke or modify an organization’s exemption retroactively if it omitted or misstated a material fact or operated in a manner materially different from that originally represented.
If we do not have these misrepresentations, the organization may rely on our determination it is exempt. However, the likelihood of revocation is diminished by the fact that section 501(c)(4)-(c)(6) organizations are not required to apply for recognition of exemption.
We discussed the hypothetical situation of a section 501(c)(4) organization that declares itself exempt as a social welfare organization, but at the end of the taxable year has in fact functioned as a political organization. Judy explained that such an organization, in order to be in compliance, would simply file Form 1120-POL and paying tax at the highest corporate rate.
Lois stated that although we do not believe that organizations which are subject to a civil audit subsequently receive any type of immunity from a criminal investigation, she will refer them to individuals from CI who can better answer that question. She explained that we are legally required to separate the civil and criminal aspects of any examination and that while we do not have EO law experts in CI, our FIU agents are experienced in coordinating with CI.
The attorneys asked whether a change in the law is necessary, and whether a three-way partnership among DOJ, the FEC, and the IRS is possible to prevent prohibited activity by these organizations. Lois listed a number of obstacles to the attorneys’ theories:
[REDACTED]
She pointed to Revenue Ruling 2004-6, which was drafted in light of the electioneering communication rules before they were litigated.
Just prior this meeting, the IRS began the process of providing the FBI confidential taxpayer information on nonprofit groups. An IRS document confirms the IRS supplied the FBI with 21 disks containing 1.25 million pages of taxpayer records:
FROM: Hamilton David K
SENT: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 2:49 PM
TO: Whittaker Sherry [Director, GE Program Management], Blackwell Robert M
SUBJECT: RE: Question
There are 113,000 C4 returns from January 1, 2007 to now. Assuming they want all pages including redacted ones, that’s 1.25 million pages … If we get started on it right away, before the 10th when the monthly extracts start, we can probably get it done in a week or so….
The DOJ documents also include a July 16, 2013, email from an undisclosed Justice Department official to a lawyer for IRS employees asking that the Obama administration get information from congressional witnesses before Congress does:
One last issue. If any of your clients have documents they are providing to Congress that you can (or would like to) provide to us before their testimony, we would be pleased to receive them. We are 6103 authorized and I can connect you with TIGTA to confirm; we would like the unredacted documents.
“These new documents show that the Obama IRS scandal is also an Obama DOJ and FBI scandal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The FBI and Justice Department worked with Lois Lerner and the IRS to concoct some reason to put President Obama’s opponents in jail before his reelection. And this abuse resulted in the FBI’s illegally obtaining confidential taxpayer information. How can the Justice Department and FBI investigate the very scandal in which they are implicated?”
On April 16, 2014, Judicial Watch forced the IRS to release documents revealing for the first time that Lerner communicated with the DOJ in May 2013 about whether it was possible to launch criminal prosecutions against targeted tax-exempt entities. The documents were obtained due to court order in an October 2013 Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the IRS.
Those documents contained an email exchange between Lerner and Nikole C. Flax, then-chief of staff to then-Acting IRS Commissioner Steven T. Miller discussing plans to work with the DOJ to prosecute nonprofit groups that “lied” (Lerner’s quotation marks) about political activities. The exchange included a May 8, 2013, email by Lerner:
I got a call today from Richard Pilger Director Elections Crimes Branch at DOJ … He wanted to know who at IRS the DOJ folk s [sic] could talk to about Sen. Whitehouse idea at the hearing that DOJ could piece together false statement cases about applicants who “lied” on their 1024s –saying they weren’t planning on doing political activity, and then turning around and making large visible political expenditures. DOJ is feeling like it needs to respond, but want to talk to the right folks at IRS to see whether there are impediments from our side and what, if any damage this might do to IRS programs. I told him that sounded like we might need several folks from IRS…
Democratic Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse held a hearing on April 9, 2013, during which, “in questioning the witnesses from the DOJ and IRS, Whitehouse asked why they have not prosecuted 501(c)(4) groups that have seemingly made false statements about their political activities…”
The House Oversight Committee followed up on these Judicial Watch disclosures with hearings and interviews of Pilger and his boss, DOJ Public Integrity Chief Jack Smith. Besides confirming the DOJ’s 2013 communications with Lerner, Pilger admitted to the committee that DOJ officials met with Lerner in October 2010. Judicial Watch obtained new documents about these meetings in December 2014 showing the Obama DOJ initiated outreach to the IRS about prosecuting tax-exempt entities.
Following Judicial Watch’s lead, the House also found out about the IRS transmittal of the confidential taxpayer information to the FBI. Because of this public disclosure, the FBI was forced to return the 1.25 million pages to the IRS.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-new-documents-reveal-doj-irs-and-fbi-plan-to-seek-criminal-charges-of-obama-opponents/
Regime Media Imploding: What’s Next for MSNBC? Plus Michael Knowles & Alex Marlow | TRIGGERED Ep.194
https://rumble.com/v5t090w-regime-media-imploding-whats-next-for-msnbc-plus-michael-knowles-and-alex-m
https://rumble.com/embed/v5qr3yk/?pub=4