Suggestion for bakers
Every time a baker takes over, they should say in a post that they denounce freemasonry. It's very simple and it will keep anons/bakers accountable. There is no vetting process for bakers and this would be a very good start. It will stop gatekeeping.
Isn't it interesting that Q mentioned the freemasons being the group acting behind the scenes to take our guns away and push degenerate anti-American propaganda, and how rarely freemasonry posts make notables?
Patterns, anons…
A good shill attempt.
"It's not the freemasons" lol we see, we know.
Shills will go to extreme lengths to avoid the topic of freemasons.
Showed the q graphic, if that isn't proof for you then anons can see your anti christian posting and pro freemasonry posting and use critical thinking to draw their own conclusions. Have fun in your lodge, freemason.
>1 post, against having bakers denounce freemasonry
anons, are you noticing the pattern and tone yet? They condescend and come to a place they clearly don't like.
Why are freemasons on the scene of mass shootings, openly giving interviews?
Anyone remember this Q post? Funny how all these shills are coming out of the wood work to defend freemasonry when the topic comes up.
What do you think?
Anons, look and see the freemasons here defending freemasonry and ignoring the q posts pointing out how they try and control the narrative.
Their only tactic is condescension. They have nothing anymore.