Want to get scared to death? Introducing AI drones that fit in the palm of your hand and can be programmed via face recognition technology and loaded with 3 grams of payload that can kill you.
https://helenaglass.net/2024/11/20/slaughterbots-mass-assassination/
Mix OIL and BLACK PAINT to give the bots a BAD DAY.
Keystone XL Pipeline Revival?
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/energy/keystone-xl-pipeline-revival/
>May all jews worldwide be treated the same way they treat the Palestinians.
That's not right… it is ZIONISM that is the CANCER
370d08
If you follow MahMoodOD you would know that even Hizbola and Hamas know it's ZIONISM that is the CANCER. You don't need to be JEWISH to be ZIONIST.
>>22063138
100% JEW HATE isn't helpful
What Sacred Book does Lindsey Graham use?
Tell me more about his fucking Christianity/
>>22063178
>Zionism is simply the political application of the jewish religious prophecies that tell jews they will rule the world from Jerusalem and enslave the whole world while killing anyone that refuses to be ruled by them.
Jew is not the same as Zionist
Just as White is not the same as Nazi.
Zionism is Jewish supremacy.
Nazism is a white supremacist who was also a national socialist.
Zionists are Jewish-fundamentalists and they are comprised of some Christians too. Its a political and historical belief derived from insane religion prejudice and fantasy.
Judaism is a religion: taken literally it would be intrinsically racist.
Jewishness is religion that became an identity with multiple identifiers
1 followers of Judaism
2 descendants of followers of Judaism
3 people who falsely identify as descendants of ppl who follow Judaism.
4 people who want free land in Palestine and pretend to be whatever grants that.
You cannot be an atheist Jew it's an oxymoron. Because Jew only exist in religion. Some people divided world into themselves Jews and everyone else gentiles. This is a division in their imagination. Accepting it makes you a believer in as least part of that religion.
If some cult walked around saying we are the Supreme people of Pluto-unicorns, it wouldn't become true. As a non believer in unicorns from Pluto you would say there are no Supreme people of Pluto-unicorns because that isn't real. Thus you cannot be one of them. If you think you are, then you're not an atheist.
If a Christian stops believing in Christ then they aren't a Christian. But xtians don't think of themselves as a race and many Jews do. But they are wrong. Anyone who believe the lies of a rabbi of any race can be Jewish. Because no one has heritage that links back to fictional people.
They don't even realize the historical claims of the Bible are also fiction and part of the religion. So by believing that they are still religious. You can not be an atheist jew and believe Israel is Jewish land. Also judeo-christian makes no sense at all
>>22063216
>>Israel is national socialist
I never said that, you just made a FUCKING LIE
Your fucking head isn't bolted down correctly motherfucker.
AND YOU SPAM.
No Fuck you. And fuck your links for the Uneducated. You just want to HATE ALL JEWS.
Kushner is a fucking piece of shit. But not all jews are a piece of shit.
You want to CHERRY PICK stories.
Vladimir Zelenko
Ukrainian-American physician
Gave us the "ZELENKO PROTOCOL" against the bioweapon.
>>22063239
>National Socialism is Nazism, you low IQ pedophile/jew. You said zionism is Nazism, and I called you out on that lie.
WRONG LIAR
I QUOTED RY DAWSON MOTHERFUCKER.
Jew is not the same as Zionist
Just as White is not the same as Nazi.
Zionism is Jewish supremacy.
Nazism is a white supremacist who was also a national socialist.
Zionists are Jewish-fundamentalists and they are comprised of some Christians too. Its a political and historical belief derived from insane religion prejudice and fantasy.
Judaism is a religion: taken literally it would be intrinsically racist.
Jewishness is religion that became an identity with multiple identifiers
1 followers of Judaism
2 descendants of followers of Judaism
3 people who falsely identify as descendants of ppl who follow Judaism.
4 people who want free land in Palestine and pretend to be whatever grants that.
You cannot be an atheist Jew it's an oxymoron. Because Jew only exist in religion. Some people divided world into themselves Jews and everyone else gentiles. This is a division in their imagination. Accepting it makes you a believer in as least part of that religion.
If some cult walked around saying we are the Supreme people of Pluto-unicorns, it wouldn't become true. As a non believer in unicorns from Pluto you would say there are no Supreme people of Pluto-unicorns because that isn't real. Thus you cannot be one of them. If you think you are, then you're not an atheist.
If a Christian stops believing in Christ then they aren't a Christian. But xtians don't think of themselves as a race and many Jews do. But they are wrong. Anyone who believe the lies of a rabbi of any race can be Jewish. Because no one has heritage that links back to fictional people.
They don't even realize the historical claims of the Bible are also fiction and part of the religion. So by believing that they are still religious. You can not be an atheist jew and believe Israel is Jewish land. Also judeo-christian makes no sense at all
Actually I suspect you are a fucking PAID SHILL for US STATE DEPARTMENT.
Best example right now is Ellen Degeneris and Porcha moved to England.. kek
> We will slowly poison them, drip by drip.
> [..etc..]
> but if they ever shall find out, it will unleash the rage of the primordial creator
Any anon got the associated NWO infographic? if so could (you) post? danks
Not my FAVORITE source for info but.
BECAUS TRUMP ELECTED.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebrity/ellen-degeneres-and-wife-portia-de-rossi-moving-to-england-after-trump-s-election-win-never-coming-back/ar-AA1uut7S
I've Filtered who ever you quoted so. It's POINTLESS for me to answer.
Are you trying to continue the 100% JEW HATE?
Let that shit thread die.
Anon puts GENE SIMMONS right next to DISNEY.
All their shit belongs BROKEN, TRASHED or taken to DEMOLITION RANCH
NIH, CDC, FDA none of them are in the Constitution or Bill of Rights.
Fauci is in the PLUM BOOK as SES where the HARP FLAG COVERS HIS HINEY from the PRISON CELL.
check..
Anon suggest you stock up on SPRAYERS, BLACK PAINT and OIL…
Good Jew
Dr. Zev Zelenko - Saved millions of people
vs
Bad Christian
Lindsey Graham
reposting
> We will slowly poison them, drip by drip.
> [..etc..]
> but if they ever shall find out, it will unleash the rage of the primordial creator
Any anon got the associated NWO infographic? if so could (you) post? danks
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/covid-cover-19-questions-we-must-answer
The COVID Cover-Up: 19 Questions We Must Answer
Authored by Justin Hart via 'Rational ground' substack,
So here's the deal - remember when "experts" kept telling us what to do during COVID?
Turns out they got pretty much everything wrong. Like, spectacularly wrong.
We're talking 19 major things they completely screwed up, from how the virus spreads to whether masks actually work (spoiler alert: those cloth masks were basically fashion accessories).
Dr. Fauci is the patron saint of TERRIBLE COVID policies.
He was wrong on SO MANY POINTS. It's time to set the record straight…
Did he get anything right?
Origin of the disease—wrong
Transmission—wrong
Asymptomatic spread—wrong
PCR testing—wrong
Fatality rate—wrong
Lockdowns—wrong
Community triggers—wrong
Business closures—wrong
School closures—wrong
Quarantining the healthy—wrong
Impact on youth—wrong
Hospital overload—wrong
Plexiglass barriers—wrong
Social distancing—wrong
Outdoor spread—wrong
Masks—wrong
Variant impact—wrong
Natural immunity—wrong
Vaccine efficacy—wrong
Vaccine injury—wrong
Last year the Norfolk Group just dropped a bomb of a document laying out all these failures. And it's not just Monday morning quarterbacking - they've got the receipts. Real studies showing how natural immunity was actually legit (while Fauci pretended it didn't exist), data proving schools could've stayed open (looking at you, Sweden), and evidence that maybe, just maybe, locking healthy people in their homes wasn't the brilliant strategy they claimed.
Listen, I'm not here to say "I told you so" (okay, maybe a little), but we need to talk about this. Because if we don't learn from how badly our "experts" messed up, we're just asking for a repeat performance next time around. And honestly? I don't think any of us can handle another round of plexiglass theater and double masking.
Let's break down exactly how they got it wrong, and more importantly, why they kept doubling down even when the evidence said otherwise. Buckle up - this is gonna be a wild ride through the greatest public health face-plant in modern history.
These are the questions WE want answered!
TRANSMISSION
Why did officials insist on surface transmission protocols when evidence showed primarily respiratory spread?
Why weren't hospitals evaluating transmission patterns early to inform policy?
Why did the CDC not conduct studies on actual transmission patterns in schools and workplaces?
Why was outdoor transmission overemphasized despite minimal evidence?
Why weren't transmission studies prioritized to guide evidence-based policies?
ASYMPTOMATIC SPREAD
What evidence supported the claim that asymptomatic spread was a major driver?
Why did health officials emphasize asymptomatic spread without solid data?
Why were resources wasted testing asymptomatic people when they could have focused on symptomatic cases?
How did the emphasis on asymptomatic spread affect public trust when evidence didn't support it?
What data actually existed on true asymptomatic (vs presymptomatic) transmission rates?
PCR TESTING
Why did the CDC insist on developing its own test rather than using WHO's?
Why weren't cycle threshold values standardized or reported?
Why did labs use cycle thresholds up to 40 when this led to false positives?
Why wasn't PCR testing prioritized for high-risk populations early on?
How did high cycle thresholds affect case counts and policy decisions?
FATALITY RATE
Why were infection fatality rates not properly stratified by age from the beginning?
Why were deaths "with COVID" vs "from COVID" not distinguished?
How did inflated fatality rates affect public perception and policy?
Why weren't accurate age-stratified fatality rates clearly communicated?
How did misrepresenting fatality rates affect public trust?
LOCKDOWNS
Why were lockdowns implemented without cost-benefit analysis?
Why were lockdown harms (mental health, delayed medical care, etc.) ignored?
What evidence supported the effectiveness of lockdowns?
Why weren't less restrictive focused protection measures tried first?
How many excess deaths were caused by lockdown policies?
Why weren't regional/seasonal factors considered in lockdown decisions?
COMMUNITY TRIGGERS
Why were arbitrary case numbers used to trigger restrictions?
Why weren't hospital capacity metrics prioritized over case counts?
How were community trigger thresholds determined?
Why weren't triggers adjusted based on actual risk levels?
Why weren't clear exit criteria established for restrictions?
BUSINESS CLOSURES
What evidence supported closing small businesses while keeping large retailers open?
Why weren't occupancy limits tried before full closures?
How many businesses were unnecessarily destroyed?
Why weren't economic impacts weighed against minimal health benefits?
What data supported effectiveness of business closures?
Donald J Trump is a CHANCE, not a GUARANTEE American government (who's proletariat doesn't represent the people) gets back on Track.
SCHOOL CLOSURES
Why were schools closed despite early evidence of low risk to children?
Why did the US ignore data from European schools that stayed open?
Why weren't the developmental/educational harms to children considered?
How did school closures affect mental health and suicide rates in youth?
Why weren't teachers unions' influence on closure decisions examined?
What evidence supported claims that schools were major transmission vectors?
QUARANTINING THE HEALTHY
Why was mass quarantine implemented without precedent or evidence?
Why weren't focused protection measures tried instead?
What was the cost-benefit analysis of quarantining low-risk groups?
How did mass quarantine affect mental health?
Why weren't vulnerable populations prioritized instead?
IMPACT ON YOUTH
Why weren't developmental impacts on children considered?
How did isolation affect mental health and suicide rates?
What were the educational losses from remote learning?
Why weren't sports/activities preserved for youth wellbeing?
How did masks/distancing affect social development?
What were the impacts on college students' mental health and development?
HOSPITAL OVERLOAD
Why weren't early treatment protocols developed to prevent hospitalizations?
Why were field hospitals built but never used?
How did "flattening the curve" messaging affect hospital preparations?
Why weren't at-risk populations protected to prevent hospitalizations?
What was the actual vs projected hospital capacity usage?
PLEXIGLASS BARRIERS
What evidence supported effectiveness of barriers?
Why weren't airflow patterns considered?
How did barriers affect ventilation?
What was the cost-benefit of barrier installation?
Why weren't barrier recommendations updated when shown ineffective?
SOCIAL DISTANCING
What evidence supported 6-foot distancing?
Why wasn't distancing adjusted based on ventilation/masks/context?
How did arbitrary distance rules affect businesses/schools?
Why wasn't 3-foot distancing considered adequate earlier?
What research supported outdoor distancing requirements?
OUTDOOR SPREAD
Why were outdoor gatherings restricted despite minimal transmission risk?
Why were beaches/parks closed?
Why weren't outdoor activities encouraged as safer alternatives?
How did outdoor restrictions affect mental/physical health?
What evidence supported masks outdoors?
MASKS
Why were mask mandates implemented without RCT evidence?
Why weren't potential harms of masking children considered?
Why were cloth masks promoted despite ineffectiveness?
How did masks affect learning/development in children?
Why weren't mask policies updated when studies showed limited benefit?
Why was natural immunity discounted in mask policies?
VARIANT IMPACT
Why were variants used to justify continued restrictions?
How did variant fears affect vaccine confidence?
Why weren't policies adjusted for milder variants?
How did variant messaging affect public trust?
Why weren't seasonal patterns considered in variant projections?
NATURAL IMMUNITY
Why was natural immunity ignored in policy decisions?
Why were recovered people required to vaccinate?
Why wasn't natural immunity studied more thoroughly?
How did dismissing natural immunity affect public trust?
Why were natural immunity studies from other countries ignored?
VACCINE EFFICACY
Why were initial efficacy claims not properly qualified?
Why wasn't waning efficacy communicated earlier?
How did overselling efficacy affect public trust?
Why weren't breakthrough cases tracked properly?
Why were boosters promoted without clear evidence of benefit?
VACCINE INJURY
Why weren't adverse events properly tracked/investigated?
Why were vaccine injuries downplayed or dismissed?
How did VAERS data interpretation affect public trust?
Why weren't age-stratified risk-benefit analyses conducted?
Why weren't early warning signals investigated more thoroughly?
How did dismissing injuries affect vaccine confidence?
We have a LOT of work to do and THANKFULLY we may have people in charge who are willing to ask these questions!
I see Qp is the latest maxresdefault. That's fun. Its consistent image hashing makes for easy filtering, ip hop or otherwise. bbc and trannies but where's the gore? sad
Where did Joe's 10 million voters in 2020 go?
https://www.norfolkgroup.org/
QUESTIONS FOR A COVID-19 COMMISSION
Introduction
America’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic failed on many levels of government and in many aspects. Certainly, deaths are unavoidable during a pandemic. However, too many U.S. policy makers concentrated efforts on ineffective or actively harmful and divisive measures such as school closures that generated enormous societal damage without significantly lowering COVID-19 mortality, while failing to protect high-risk Americans. As a result, Americans were hard hit both by the disease and by collateral damage generated by misguided pandemic strategies and decisions that ignored years of pandemic preparation guidance crafted by numerous public health agencies, nationally and internationally.
Many crucial mistakes were made early on, in January, February, and early March 2020, and not corrected later. Mistakes made during this early critical window at the beginning of the pandemic affected our ability to collect data about COVID-19 and protect those most at risk and laid the groundwork for loss of public trust and confusion. These oversights led to unnecessary morbidity and mortality, particularly in nursing homes, and a lack of much-needed medical supplies, reagents for testing, and required medications. Delays in initiating research on key questions such as effectiveness of therapeutics, modes of transmission, length of infective periods, and other questions, meant that policy decisions were based on assumptions rather than on solid data. To this day, many of these questions have not been adequately addressed through robust trials.
At hospitals, morbidity and mortality (M&Ms) conferences are used to examine errors or omissions in order to improve medical care. Aviation agencies conduct detailed investigations after airplane accidents and incidents. Pandemics are recurring events throughout history, and there will be future pandemics. It is thus critically important that we thoroughly examine federal pandemic responses and decisions so that we can identify and learn from mistakes. Individual states should take on the responsibility of conducting similar processes to analyze their own responses to the pandemic. Other countries have conducted such inquiries (Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Denmark) and made results available to the public and to decision makers. The United States is notably absent from this list. These inquiries pose important questions to key decision makers during the pandemic, including (i) politicians, (ii) leaders of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), (iii) state health departments, (iv) university presidents, medical school deans, hospital executives, medical journal editors, and leading public health scientists, as well as (iv) news media and technology/media companies.
This document is not a report from such an inquiry. Rather, we present a blueprint containing key public health questions for a COVID-19 commission. In separate chapters we summarize key background information and propose specific questions about failures to protect older high-risk Americans, about school closures, collateral lockdown harms, lack of robust public health data collected and/or made available, misleading risk communication, downplaying infection-acquired immunity, masks, testing, vaccine efficacy and safety, therapeutics, and epidemiological modeling.
We chose not to discuss economic issues, although we recognize that negative effects on the economy have long-term negative effects on public health. We have also chosen not to engage in issues regarding media handling of the pandemic, nor questions of how, when and why the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated. Public health responses to a pandemic are devised and implemented independently of viral origin.
This document was prepared and written solely by its eight authors. No other person discussed its content, or saw a draft or the final version before publication. Seven of us started the work at an in-person meeting in Norfolk, Connecticut, organized by the Brownstone Institute in May of 2022. We wrote and edited the bulk of this document during the subsequent six months. In honor of the place where we met, we call ourselves the Norfolk Group.
The eight of us hold a wide range of political views and are not united by any particular political viewpoints. All the authors have voiced criticisms of how the pandemic was handled by government agencies and individuals appointed by and serving in both Republican and Democratic administrations. This is a public-health document, and we write it as scientists with different specific areas of expertise, but sharing the same views regarding the basic principles of public health. Our work on this document was not on behalf of any institution, public or private. Further, the statements written in these articles by the Norfolk Group represent their personal interpretations and do not necessarily represent those of their employers. Last, as data are collected and new studies emerge, some of these documents and statements may become out of date or less accurate. These documents are based on current information as of January 2023 and may not have not been updated past that date.
The eight members of the Norfolk Group are:
Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD; epidemiologist, health economist, and professor at Stanford University School of Medicine; founding fellow of the Academy of Science and Freedom.
Leslie Bienen, MFA, DVM; veterinarian, zoonotic disease researcher, and faculty member at Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health (through December 31st 2022). She left in January 2023 to work in healthcare policy.
Ram Duriseti, MD, PhD; emergency room physician and computational engineer for medical decision making; associate professor at Stanford School of Medicine.
Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD; physician and PhD epidemiologist in the Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, clinical researcher in healthcare policy and practicing Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation physician.
Martin Kulldorff, PhD, FDhc; epidemiologist and biostatistician; professor of medicine at Harvard University (on leave); founding fellow of the Academy of Science and Freedom.
Marty Makary, MD, MPH; Physician, public policy researcher, professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and member of the National Academy of Medicine.
Margery Smelkinson, PhD; infectious disease scientist and microscopist whose research predominantly focuses on host/pathogen interactions.
Steven Templeton, PhD; immunologist; associate professor at Indiana University School of Medicine.
This report may be freely republished, in whole or in part, with a clear reference to its original publication by the Norfolk Group at www.NorfolkGroup.org. Throughout the document, references are provided as hyperlinks.
Luke Warmwater
The answer to all of this is that the entire charade was a military operation. Everything they got wrong was due to top down mandate. Independent doctors that kept their integrity and empathy were quick to study and develop early treatment protocols that were successful. Logically, as news of effective treatment spread, you would expect quick adoption by hospitals and clinics. But we saw the opposite. When the military runs an op, they control it completely. There was to be no outside influence. Doctors were to follow mandate or lose their job. And maybe most obvious was the stark contrast between what normally sane doctors accept as collateral damage and what the military is willing to accept in pursuit of a successfully executed operation.
HorizonD7
I was uncertain about the extent of military involvement in Covid until I read this: https://slaynews.com/news/dutch-government-official-admits-covid-pandemic-military-operation-ministry-health-obeys-nato/
I suggest that we stop saying that in dealing with the Covid hoax, government and healthcare "experts" got it wrong. It appears to me that the Covid event was a very successful real world test of fear propaganda and population control. "They" operated according to careful planning and it was, as you said above, a "successfully executed operation".
However, the questions in the article are absolutely valid for exposing what was purposely done.
susan mullen
Quite right, starting with the fact that it wasn't Fauci but Dr. Birx who dictated everything in the Trump White House. Fauci, like everyone else from Trump on down, was subordinate to Birx. Dr. Scott Atlas reported this in his Dec. 2021 book, also that Jared Kushner chaired 3x weekly "Covid Huddle" meetings to ensure 100% compliance with Birx narrative. It was reported elsewhere that Birx was hired by #2 man in Trump NSA, Matt Pottinger. This article merely diverts attention from the real cause of it all.
The US STATE DEPARTMENT / CIA / NSA owned WASHINGTON POST SEZ…
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/11/washington-post-calls-for-selective-non-prosecution-of-war-crimes.html
you will never know what a 123 is then.
123@mail.house.gov is as close as you will get
you won't know about
123@mail.state.us
and you won't know about trained girls that kill
ATTN: Mike Rothschild (you fucking piece of shit)
Testing 123
>
The surgeon general pick backed Fauci and pushed all the lies of NIH, CDC and FDA in 2020. She is the worst pick, PDJT has to be notified she should never be there. Natalie Winters On President Trump's Surgeon General Pick: "No Place In President Trump's Cabinet
Actually she is the perfect pick, Trump is pro vaccine.
RFK Jr. talks health care agenda following Trump win: ‘I’m not going to take away vaccines’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fMfOnKUfik
Nov 6, 2024 Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who may play a key role in overseeing health care in a second Trump administration, spoke to NBC News’ Vaughn Hillyard about his current views on vaccines, fluoride in water, and more.
“I’m the father of the vaccine because I’m the one who pushed it”: Donald Trump
https://rumble.com/v2pe6sy-im-the-father-of-the-vaccine-because-im-the-one-who-pushed-it-donald-trump.html
“It will save millions of lives, and soon end the pandemic once and for all. These vaccines are also very safe.“ — Donald J Trump, December 11th, 2020
“The vaccine and the vaccine rollout are getting the best of reviews. Moving along really well. Get those shots everyone!“ — Donald J Trump, December 17th, 2020
“I hope everyone remembers when they’re getting the COVID-19 Vaccine, that if I wasn’t President, you wouldn’t be getting that beautiful shot for 5 years, at best, and probably wouldn't be getting it at all. I hope everyone remembers!“ — Donald J Trump, February 28th, 2021
“Everybody, go get your shot.“ — Donald J Trump, February 28th, 2021
“It works incredibly well. 95%, maybe even more than that…and it is really saving our country and it is saving frankly the world.“ — Donald J Trump, March 9th, 2021
“I would recommend it and I would recommend it to a lot of people that don't want to get it and a lot of those people voted for me, frankly.“ — Donald J Trump, March 16th, 2021
“We have our freedoms, and we have to live by that, and I agree with that also. But it is a great vaccine. It is a safe vaccine, and it is something that works.“ — Donald J Trump, March 17th, 2021
“I guess in a certain way, I’m the FATHER of the Vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. To get it done in less than nine months was a miracle. Fauci said it would take 3 to 5 years. I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before. It’s a great vaccine, it’s a safe vaccine, it’s something that works” — Donald J Trump, April 29th, 2021
“I'm very proud of the vaccine, I've taken it, you've probably taken it. But I'm very proud of it. I think we could have another situation with the Spanish Flu, 1917, where up to 100 million people were killed.“ — Donald J. Trump, August 18th, 2021
“I recommend taking the vaccines. I did it, it’s good. Take the vaccines.” — Donald J Trump, August 21st, 2021
“Well, I got the Pfizer, and I would have been very happy with any of them. I thought a very bad statement was when they did a pause on Johnson & Johnson. I think that frightened a lot of people. That was a bad thing to do. At that time, when they did the pause, they had six people that may have had some difficulty out of millions that received it. But I think the pause was a very bad thing to do.“ — Donald J Trump, October 2nd, 2021
“During my administration, everybody wanted the vaccine. There was nobody saying oh, gee, I don't want to take it. Now they say that. And that's because they don't trust the Biden administration. I can think of no other reason. But they say we don't want it, we aren't going to take it. When I was there, everybody wanted it and we were doing great. Well, the military did a fantastic job.“ — Donald J Trump, October 7th, 2021
Trump offers praise for absent Fauci: ‘He’s a good man. I like Dr. Fauci a lot.’
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/489145-trump-offers-praise-for-nihs-fauci-hes-a-good-man/
President Trump on Monday praised National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci
“He’s a good man. I like Dr. Fauci a lot,” Trump told reporters when asked why Fauci was not at Monday’s briefing.
'I hope he keeps it up': Hear Fauci's praise for Trump
https://www.axios.com/2021/12/26/fauci-covid-vaccine-trump-support
Dec 26, 2021 In an interview on ABC's "This Week," Dr. Anthony Fauci praised Donald Trump for promoting vaccines and expressed dismay over a crowd booing the former president when he announced that he'd received his Covid-19 booster shot.
Donald Trump praised the efficacy of the coronavirus vaccines in a new interview just days after being booed
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-renews-praise-covid-vaccines-one-greatest-achievements-mankind-n1286551
Dec. 23, 2021 Donald Trump praised the efficacy of the coronavirus vaccines in a new interview just days after being booed by an audience for revealing he received a Covid booster shot.
"The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind," Trump told conservative commentator Candace Owens in an interview on Wednesday.
"I came up with a vaccine, with three vaccines all are very, very good," he said in the interview, referring to the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson shots.
Trump also said people who are vaccinated aren't the ones becoming seriously ill.
"The ones that get very sick and go to the hospital are the ones that don't do the vaccine, but it's still their choice," he said.
"And if you take the vaccine you're protected, the results of the vaccine are good."
Biden offers rare praise of Trump during Covid speech
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/21/politics/biden-trump-covid-vaccine-booster/index.html
“I got my booster shot as soon as they were available,” Biden said during a speech from the White House about his administration’s efforts to address the Omicron variant of Covid-19, adding, “and just the other day former President Trump announced he had gotten his booster shot.” “It may be one of the few things he and I agree on,” Biden continued.
Trump told Fox News later on Tuesday that he appreciated Biden’s comments. “I was surprised to hear it,” Trump said. “I think it was a terrific thing, and I think it makes a lot of people happy.”
Trump calls politicians who refuse to say they received Covid boosters 'gutless'
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-calls-politicians-who-refuse-say-they-received-covid-boosters-n1287342
Jan. 12, 2022 Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized politicians who refuse to say whether they’ve received a Covid booster shot.
“They don’t want to say it because they’re gutless,” Trump said.
“You gotta say it, whether you had it or not. Say it. But the fact is that I think the vaccines saved tens of millions throughout the world. I’ve had absolutely no side effects.”
“If they get it, they’re not going to hospitals for the most part and dying,” Trump said. “Before it was a horror, and now they’re not.”
Trump urges people to get COVID vaccine, saying it's safe and works
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-covid-vaccine-urge-safe-works/
March 17, 2021 Former President Trump again urged people to be vaccinated against COVID-19
An ad that featured Trump saying he 'would recommend' COVID-19 vaccines resulted in 104,000 more shots in arms: research paper
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ad-praising-covid-19-vaccines-convinced-thousands-2022-4?op=1
2022-04-05 A YouTube ad featuring Donald Trump endorsing the COVID-19 vaccines convinced thousands of people to get their shots, according to new research from economists and political scientists published in a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper on Monday. For the study, researchers created a 27 second advertisement that included Trump and his family urging people to get the vaccines.
The ad ran on more than 100,000 YouTube channels in the second half of October, 2021. On the Fox News YouTube channel, it ran before segments with some of the network's most popular hosts, including Laura Ingraham, Tucker Carlson, and Sean Hannity.
Researchers estimate the campaign led to 104,036 more shots being administered, calling the move a "cost-effective" way to increase vaccination rates in the country, at a time when 60% of unvaccinated adults were Republicans.
Ivanka Trump: “Today, I got the shot!!! I hope that you do too!”
https://nypost.com/2021/04/15/ivanka-trump-posts-pic-getting-covid-vaccine-on-social-media/
“Today, I got the shot!!! I hope that you do too!” the 39-year-old former first daughter wrote Wednesday alongside photos of her getting jabbed in her left arm while wearing a white T-shirt, jeans and a mask.
Ivanka told the wire service that “getting vaccinated is our best way to beat this virus and protect ourselves and others.”
https://twitter.com/ivankatrump/status/1382435705847226369
Trump Dismisses COVID-19 Vax Safety Claims, Says He Saved 100 Million Lives (in 2023!)
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-says-he-saved-100-million-lives-covid-vaccines-1774178
Jan 16, 2023 Former President Donald Trump has dismissed claims that COVID-19 vaccines are broadly unsafe while asserting that his own role in the development of the vaccines may have saved 100 million lives.
"I was able to get something approved that, you know, that has proven to have saved a lot of lives," Trump said, ignoring Brody's request to weigh in on the anti-vaccine narrative. "Some people say that I saved 100 million lives worldwide."
Trump touted the speed of vaccine development under his program, saying that he was "able to get [the vaccines] done in nine months," as opposed to what he claimed would have been "five years to 12 years."
"But you know, you have many reports that say the vaccines save tens of millions of lives," he continued. "That without the vaccines you would have had a thing…where perhaps 100 million people died."
congrats on the first device, your apple faggotry is showing. batt is low, charge it.
>>22063883
blyat
THEY ALL GONNA LOSE
751