>>2208767 (prev bread)

You post 20+ posts of pure worthless bullshit yet when a good discussion surfaces you call "muh joos". Where is the pro BIBI shilling ha? All posts in the discussion were neutral and speculative. Who am I to read Netanyahu's mind or know what he is really up to?

Hope Soros pays you good money.

baker - a good discussion on a previous notable

>>2208614 (previous bread)

It gives context to Netanyahu's words.

>>2208813

Lol thats a good one mr. Shill. Half of your posts were the usual "muh joo" shit, the never ending sourceless bibi "qoute" and calling out baker on this blacklist anon stuff.

For what its worth blacklist anon could be a good larp, he doesn't get q status that easily

You on the other hand kept glorifying him and calling out the baker and the "muh joos". Sounds like a new shilling tactic. Being a stealthy shill, contribuing to a side dig but shilling whenever possible. If you are not a shill than why shit on a good discussion? Why use sourceless muh joo memes?

Keep up the good and make Soros proud.

>>2208847

I wrote that it is a good discussion = opinions. And it was a neutral one so where is the JIDF?

The muh joo shilling is at its peak

>>2208906

Soros money smells. You should do a better job shill. Causing you to post more just makes it clearer and clearer.

>>2208918

And how does the owl has anything to do with Turnbull. Your "digging" cover for your shilling is an embarresment.

The more you post the more you expose youself. I am happy to make you post more. Enjoy the soros $$

>>2209109

I think it a 50% 50%. Either blacklist anon is legit or he is a shilling attempt. I dont think it is an innocent larp. It is strange that this guy appears out of nowhere when Q havent posted in 2 weeks. Sounds like a possible dig redirection from Q and Russia related stuff to this less volatile movie industry topic.

Also the fact that shills endirse him raises a flag.

Im still 50 50 on him, though leaning a bit more towards a it being a shilling attempt.

>>2209152

100% agree. Looks more like an attempt to slide the digs to less volatile directions. Instead of digging the Russia HRC payments, Bill Browder and Khodorkovsky he wants us to dig hollywood

>>2209199

Lol the more you post the stinkier your pockets smell of Soros money. Keep posting more, youre just increasing your glow as a shill.

So now you are giving this balcklist anon a Q status as a "crumb dropper" no less. It just makes it clearer that it is all a sliding shilling attempt, prepared to redirect the digs from Russia HRC and cabal connection. What a coincidence that it started in Q's absence and following the massive Russia and Bill browder digs.

I still give blacklist anon the benefit of the doubt but this shit is getting more and more suspicious

>>2209252

You aren't fooling anyone. Your pockets smell of Soros dirty $$. It's a nice attempt to install a "new Q" as this blacklist anon and push him hard to slide the diggs from Russia and Bill

Browder and Khodorkovsky. I guess your employer Soros is affraid that we got close to something BOOM worthy.

>>2209274

Im done feeding the shill, you have soros for that. You posted more than enough to show your true face, a face of a loser who sells himself for Soros $$. Have fun earning your well deserved pocket money.

Going back to digging. Anon out