Anonymous ID: 8c6fd6 Dec. 1, 2024, 10:39 a.m. No.22088778   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8791

>>22088750

That's projection, Moran. I made an astute observation, based upon sourced information directly taken from the internet. (see link)

 

By all means, though, since you're all-knowing, please tell me who it was that pushed transgenderism on the masses? The Christians? The Muslims?

 

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-eight-genders-in-the-talmud/

Anonymous ID: 8c6fd6 Dec. 1, 2024, 10:40 a.m. No.22088790   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22088775

>How very Maoist of you.

He's not wrong. We're under no obligation, via the Constitution itself, to recognizeanygovernment agency that doesn't fall under the umbrella of the Constitution. Sure, they can do it by force, if necessary, which they do, but the Tree of Liberty needs to be watered from time to time, does it not?

Anonymous ID: 8c6fd6 Dec. 1, 2024, 10:45 a.m. No.22088823   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8845

>>22088805

>Maoist is Variety of Marxismโ€“Leninism developed by Mao Zedong

This is precisely why the removal of civics by the Department of Education was detrimental to American society. Most Americans know nothing of the Constitution, nor the inalienable rights it enforces.

Anonymous ID: 8c6fd6 Dec. 1, 2024, 10:50 a.m. No.22088850   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22088818

>If it makes you happy, change it to ethnicity.

Wait, so you conflate an argument as a defense and when I call you out on the fallacy, you expect me to correct bad behavior? You're the one who made it about "Country." You're also the one who made it about "Race and/or Religion" and now you're trying to say it's "Ethnic?" You haven't made an argument to the information I provided, nor have you done anything to dispute it.

> Works either way.

Actually, it doesn't. If the government is prohibited from elevating one religion over another and transgenderism is in the root of Judaism, it stands to reason that any laws enforcing transgenderism is illegal, per your own argument of the Freedom FROM Religion clause. There's a Christian baker that would want to have a talk with you, I'm sure.