Democrats Weigh Dumping Jerrold Nadler for Jamie Raskin in House Judiciary Committee(Snakes at each others Throats for Power)NYT's
Nov. 30, 2024, 5:02 a.m. ET.1/2
Some House Democrats want to oust aging committee leaders like Representative Jerrold Nadler in favor of younger lawmakers who they see as better suited to take on the president.
House Democrats are considering pushing aside some of their most senior leaders from top posts in the next Congress, driven by a worry that aging members are not up to the task of countering President-elect Donald J. Trump and his loyal Republican allies in Congress.
The debate has grown most intense in recent days as dozens of Democrats have been privately pressing Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland to challenge Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York for his position as the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. They are doing so out of concern that Mr. Nadler will be ineffective in pushing back against any efforts by Mr. Trump to abuse his power.
Mr. Nadler, 77, the dean of New York’s congressional delegation, has made it clear he has no plans to step aside. And while Mr. Raskin, 61, is mulling a challenge, he has not yet decided whether to pursue one, according to colleagues familiar with his thinking who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the matter.
“As a New Yorker, I have stood up to Donald Trump my entire career,” Mr. Nadler wrote in a letter to colleagues announcing his run for re-election to the post, in which he emphasized his history of going after Mr. Trump. “When he became president, I led the Judiciary Committee’s efforts to hold him accountable for his various abuses of power, culminating in two historic impeachments.”
Mr. Raskin, a former professor of constitutional law, developed a progressive fan base for his work as the lead impeachment manager against Mr. Trump in 2021 and as the top Democrat on the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol that year. He is seen by many colleagues as more aggressive, articulate and shrewd than Mr. Nadler when it comes to taking on the former and future president.
Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been among those privately encouraging him to challenge Mr. Nadler, according to the people familiar with the internal discussions.
Mr. Raskin and Mr. Nadler are also close friends, making the internal drama even more uncomfortable. Mr. Nadler led the whip operation for Mr. Raskin’s run for the top post on the Oversight Committee, which he now occupies. They are both members of the unofficial Jewish caucus in the House.
Neither responded to requests for comment.
House Democratic leaders have stayed neutral, telling members that the caucus “should work its will” in an internal election to choose the top Democrat on the panel.
But even that seemingly innocuous statement marks a break from the typical stance of Democratic leaders, whose policy in the past has been to protect incumbents in top posts on House committees and discourage challengers.
Representative Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, declined to comment for this story.
The intraparty intrigue exemplifies how Democrats are trying to regroup in the wake of Mr. Trump’s victory and the G.O.P.’s sweep of Congress, and mount a more effective opposition to Mr. Trump and his MAGA allies on Capitol Hill.
Many Democrats expect that the Judiciary Committee, headed by Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, one of Mr. Trump’s closest and most combative allies on Capitol Hill, will be the center of the action next year. It is where important fights will play out over the independence of the Justice Department, the rule of law and presidential powers, and reproductive rights.
There has been growing discontent among some Democrats about Mr. Nadler’s leadership of the committee. Some grumble that he rarely veers from talking points, whereas Mr. Raskin is seen as a sharp-tongued debater more adept at spontaneous sparring.
Progressive Democrats in particular have been pushing aggressively to get Mr. Nadler out. One prominent activist on the left warned that should he fail to step aside voluntarily, Mr. Nadler could end up like Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who was forced to take a hiatus from the top Judiciary spot at the age of 89, long after it had become clear that her health and cognitive issues had made it impossible for her to be effective in the post. She died less than six months later.
“Jerry Nadler is a legend in Congress and New York who will inevitably step aside at some point in his political life,” said Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. “The question is: Will it be more as a Nancy Pelosi or a Dianne Feinstein?”
https://archive.is/qKrIC