(Why do all lefties, have an arrogant gleam of darkness around them?)
Stanford misinformation expert accused of using AI to fabricate court statement
By Linda Liu Dec. 2, 2024, 12:45 a.m.
Communication professor Jeff Hancock, anexpert on technology and misinformation, has been accused of usingartificial intelligence (AI) to craft a court statement.
In November,Hancock — who is the founding directorof Stanford’s Social Media Lab —filed a declaration in a Minnesota court caseover the state’s 2023 law that criminalizes the use of deepfakes to influence an election. Theprofessor’s 12-page declarationin defense of the law contained 15 citations,two of which cannot be found.
The plaintiffs of the case, Republican Minnesota State Representative Mary Franson and conservative social media satirist Christopher Kohls,argued that the law is an unconstitutional limit on free speech. Submitting his testimony on behalf of a defendant, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, Hancock claimed that deepfakes, or AI-generated media that alter a person’s likeness or voice, can enhance the persuasiveness of misinformation and defy traditional factchecking methods.
He made his declaration, for whichhe was compensated at the government rate of $600 per hour, under penalty of perjury that everything he stated in the document was “true and correct.”
The Daily and other news outletscould not find two academic journal articles that Hancock cited— “Deepfakes and the Illusion of Authenticity: Cognitive Processes Behind Misinformation Acceptance” and “The Influence of Deepfake Videos on Political Attitudes and Behavior” — via their reported digital object identifier or in the archives of their reported journals.
Pointing out the errors in Hancock’s declaration in a Nov. 16 filing, Franson and Kohls’ attorney Frank Berdnarz called for it to be excluded from the judge’s consideration of whether to give a preliminary injunction against the law.
“The citation bears the hallmarks of being an artificial intelligence (AI) ‘hallucination,’ suggesting that at least the citation was generated by a large language model like ChatGPT,” Berdnarz wrote. “The existence of a fictional citation Hancock(or his assistants) didn’t even bother to click calls into question the quality and veracity of the entire declaration.”
The Daily has reached out to Hancock for comment.
Hancock, who currently teaches COMM 1: “Introduction to Communication” and COMM 324: “Language and Technology,”appearedin a 2024 Netflix documentary featuringBill Gates, offering insights on the future of AI.
The professor isscheduled to teachCOMM 124/224:“Truth, Trust, and Tech” on deception and communication technology in the spring.
Kohls, known for his social mediamoniker Mr. Reagan, previouslychallenged the constitutionalityof two California bills signed into law in September by Gov. Gavin Newsom. The bills, AB 2655 and AB 2839, require online platforms to block certain deceptive media content relating to elections and prohibit the distribution of advertising content with deceptive media content. Newsom called out Kohls’ viral video, which manipulated Kamala Harris’ voice in a campaign ad, to be illegal.
Yuanlin "Linda" Liu ‘25 is The Daily's vol. 266 Editor-in-Chief. She was previously managing editor of arts & life during vol. 263 and 264 and magazine editor during vol. 265. Contact her at eic 'at' stanforddaily.com.
https://stanforddaily.com/2024/12/02/jeff-hancock-court-declaration/
Was Hancock involved in the Stanford study about misinformation and elections, it wouldn’t surprise me at all?