>>2209368 LB
To go further with this twat train of thought, if you look at income statements for all the Big Pharma corps, you'll find right down the line more or less that their biggest line-item on the expense side is
ADVERTISING & MARKETING EXPENSE
So if prices are coming down and the pharma corps need to keep their stock prices up with less income coming in, they're gonna need to reduce expenses somewhere. What's the most logical area to cut? see above for clue
On the MSM side, RFK Jr. stated in a 2006 vaccine doc, The Truth About Vaccines, that over 50% of the MSM ad buys in non-political years come from guess who?
BIG PHARMA
(RFK Jr. also divulged in that doc that he was friends with Roger Ailes since they were teenagers, so his claim has sauce behind it.)
So if ad prices are contingent on demand, and Big Pharma spends less on marketing and thus are buying far fewer ads, what happens to ad prices overall, which directly affect the bottom line on the balance sheets of these MSM companies/divisions?
Now see why the Fake News Media is freaking out?
Stable f'n genius.