Anonymous ID: 7ae964 July 19, 2018, 5:50 a.m. No.2209699   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2205887 -NYT Gets Leaks Again #2781 Notable

>That included one particularly valuable source, who was considered so sensitive that Mr. Brennan had declined to refer to it in any way in the Presidential Daily Brief during the final months of the Obama administration, as the Russia investigation intensified.

 

Is that "one particularly valuable source'' Bill Browder?

Anonymous ID: 7ae964 July 19, 2018, 6:13 a.m. No.2209804   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9888

>>2209689

>>2209602

Just skimmed the BL stuff, but can't get into it atm, as focusing elsewhere.

Understand your position re: "insider" info…seems to be all the rage lately.

 

That said, would vote to keep it in there to give others a chance to see if it checks out or not.

Feynman praised the method of taking speculation & then backtracking to find the validity (or not).

Opposite of the scientific method (which came to this country through the founding of Harvard & "scientism" in the 17th century btw).

 

At this stage, finely tuned discernment is our friend.

One opinion only, your call.

Anonymous ID: 7ae964 July 19, 2018, 6:25 a.m. No.2209881   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2209701

Bet you right now MO's initiative will be focusing in states that will have little chance of any voter registration reform before the midterms.

Personally know of at least one state that don't require an ID (even a utility bill) to register.

Anonymous ID: 7ae964 July 19, 2018, 6:54 a.m. No.2210074   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0163

>>2209368 LB

To go further with this twat train of thought, if you look at income statements for all the Big Pharma corps, you'll find right down the line more or less that their biggest line-item on the expense side is

ADVERTISING & MARKETING EXPENSE

So if prices are coming down and the pharma corps need to keep their stock prices up with less income coming in, they're gonna need to reduce expenses somewhere. What's the most logical area to cut? see above for clue

 

On the MSM side, RFK Jr. stated in a 2006 vaccine doc, The Truth About Vaccines, that over 50% of the MSM ad buys in non-political years come from guess who?

BIG PHARMA

(RFK Jr. also divulged in that doc that he was friends with Roger Ailes since they were teenagers, so his claim has sauce behind it.)

 

So if ad prices are contingent on demand, and Big Pharma spends less on marketing and thus are buying far fewer ads, what happens to ad prices overall, which directly affect the bottom line on the balance sheets of these MSM companies/divisions?

 

Now see why the Fake News Media is freaking out?

Stable f'n genius.