Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 6:36 p.m. No.22103024   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3037 >>3045 >>3047 >>3067 >>3088 >>3089 >>3328 >>3413

'I was beaten up by Turkish police and jailed because I 'looked gay''

 

A Portuguese man claims he was arrested in Turkey and kept in a squalid prison for nearly three weeks because he "looked gay".

 

Miguel Alvaro was solo holidaying in Istanbul last month when he went out to meet a friend for lunch and became lost. He asked police for directions but unbeknownst to him there was a gay rights parade nearby, which was unsanctioned by authorities.

 

Miguel told Portuguese outlet P3 that one of the officers ordered him to be arrested immediately and he was suddenly shoved in the back of a van.

 

He claims: "They grabbed my arms and I tried to free myself. One of them hit me in the ribs, they pushed me against a van, and they hit me on the shoulder, which started to bleed.

 

"After five hours in the police van, in which I was only told to shut up and be quiet, one of them explained to me that he had been detained because of my appearance.

 

"They thought I would participate in an unauthorised LGBTI+ march that was going to take place nearby because I looked gay. I was in the wrong place at the wrong time."

 

Miguel said he was so afraid of attacks from other inmates because of his sexuality that he barely slept, plus the bedsheets were crawling with maggots.

 

A few weeks after his arrests he was allowed to make his first phone call. He chose to ring his dad, who then contacted the Portuguese embassy to secure his release.

 

Miguel says he has been left "in a horrible psychological state", adding: "I’m very afraid of the consequences in the future. I can’t believe this happened to me. I pray for justice to be done."

 

Homosexuality is legal in Turkey but many parts of the country are socially conservative and have become an increasingly hostile place for queer people.

 

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan vilified gay people during his re-election campaign, calling them a threat to society and rallying conservatives against them - saying gay people would never "infiltrate" his governing party. Pride events have also been systematically banned in Turkey since 2015.

 

"L.G.B.T. is a poison injected into the institution of the family. It is not possible for us to accept that poison as a country whose people are 99 per cent Muslim", President Erdogan told young people during a televised meeting in early May.

 

In April, his interior minister, Suleyman Soylu, also falsely claimed that gay rights would allow humans to marry animals.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/i-beaten-up-turkish-police-30527804

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:06 p.m. No.22103171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3176 >>3197 >>3328 >>3413

OnlyFans star Sophie Rain who earned $43 million in one year is a virgin and devout Christian

 

-The influencer, 20, is currently the biggest star on OnlyFans

-She claims to be a virgin despite making millions from selling racy content

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14153633/sophie-rain-onlyfans-christian-virgin.html

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:08 p.m. No.22103185   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3211 >>3328 >>3413

Chad Chronister

@ChadChronister

 

To have been nominated by President-Elect @realDonaldTrump to serve as Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is the honor of a lifetime. Over the past several days, as the gravity of this very important responsibility set in, I’ve concluded that I must respectfully withdraw from consideration. There is more work to be done for the citizens of Hillsborough County and a lot of initiatives I am committed to fulfilling. I sincerely appreciate the nomination, outpouring of support by the American people, and look forward to continuing my service as Sheriff of Hillsborough County.

 

https://x.com/ChadChronister/status/1864068222309277751

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:11 p.m. No.22103196   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3328 >>3413

Tight race for the North Carolina Supreme Court is heading to another recount

 

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The very close election for a North Carolina Supreme Court seat heads next to a hand recount even as election officials announced a machine recount of over 5.5 million ballots resulted in no margin change between the candidates.

 

The statewide machine recount — in which ballots were run again through tabulators — that wrapped up this week showed Democratic Associate Justice Allison Riggs with a 734-vote lead over Republican challenger Jefferson Griffin, who is a Court of Appeals judge.

 

Most county election boards reported minor vote changes from the machine recount requested by Griffin. But State Board of Elections data showed the post-recount lead but that lead dwindled and flipped to Riggs as tens of thousands of qualifying provisional and absentee ballots were added to the totals through the canvass.

 

Griffin, who already has pending election protests challenging the validity of more than 60,000 ballots counted statewide, has asked for a partial hand-to-eye recount, which county boards will start Wednesday or Thursday.

 

The partial hand recount applies to ballots in 3% of the voting sites in all 100 counties, chosen at random Tuesday by the state board. Once the partial recount is complete, a statewide hand recount would be ordered if the sample results differ enough from the machine recount that the result would be reversed if the difference were extrapolated to all ballots.

 

Riggs, who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2023 and now seeks an eight-year term, again claimed victory Tuesday. In a campaign news release, spokesperson Embry Owen said Griffin “needs to immediately concede – losing candidates must respect the will of voters and not needlessly waste state resources.” Riggs is one of two Democrats on the seven-member court.

 

Through attorneys, Griffin has challenged ballots that he says may not qualify for several reasons and cast doubt on the election result. Among them: voter registration records of some voters casting ballots lack driver’s license or partial Social Security numbers, and overseas voters never living in North Carolina may run afoul of state residency requirements.

 

State and county boards are considering the protests. Griffin’s attorneys on Monday asked the state board to accelerate the matters before it and make a final ruling early next week.

 

“Our priority remains ensuring that every legal vote is counted and that the public can trust the integrity of this election,” state Republican Party spokesperson Matt Mercer said in a news release. Final rulings by the state board can be appealed to state court.

 

Joining Griffin in protests are three Republican legislative candidates who still trailed narrowly in their respective races after the machine recounts. The Supreme Court race and two of these three legislative races have not been called by The Associated Press.

 

The key pending legislative race is for a House seat covering Granville County and parts of Vance County. Republican Rep. Frank Sossamon trails Democratic challenger Bryan Cohn by 228 votes, down from 233 votes before the recount. Sossamon also asked for a partial hard recount in his race, which was to begin Tuesday.

 

Should Cohn win, Republicans will fall one seat short of the 72 needed in the 120-member House to retain its veto-proof majority — giving more leverage to Democratic Gov.-elect Josh Stein in 2025. Senate Republicans already have won 30 of the 50 seats needed to retain its supermajority in their chamber.

 

The AP on Tuesday did call another legislative race not subject to a protest, as Mecklenburg County GOP Rep. Tricia Cotham won her reelection bid over Democrat Nicole Sidman. A machine recount showed Cotham ahead of Sidman by 213 votes, compared to 216 after the county canvass. Cotham’s switch from the Democrats to the Republicans in April 2023 secured the Republicans’ 72-seat veto-proof majority so that Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s vetoes could be overridden by relying solely on GOP lawmakers.

 

https://mynorthwest.com/4015791/tight-race-for-the-north-carolina-supreme-court-is-heading-to-another-recount/

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:13 p.m. No.22103205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3328 >>3413

You can’t make this up: Dafna Yoran is the Manhattan prosecutor currently throwing the book at Daniel Penny.

 

In 2019, she gave a reduced sentence to a black man who murdered an asian college professor as he was withdrawing cash from an ATM.

 

She said that it was under the guise of “restorative justice” and ended up giving him 10 years for manslaughter after he was originally charged with murder.

 

Now she’s attempting to imprison an innocent man who protected a group of people on the subway.

 

https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1864031599362535665

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:15 p.m. No.22103218   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3328 >>3413

Daniel Penny prosecutor dangles race card again over defense objection despite no hate crime charges

 

NEW YORK CITY — Manhattan prosecutors again accused Daniel Penny of failing to recognize the "humanity" of Jordan Neely during their closing arguments Monday, weeks after being accused of unfairly hinting at racial undertones in a case that does not involve hate crime charges.

 

"He didn't recognize that Jordan Neely was a person," Manhattan prosecutor Dafna Yoran told the jury. "He saw him as a person that needed to be eliminated."

 

She claimed that Penny "was so reckless with Neely’s life because he didn't seem to recognize his humanity." She replayed video of Penny's police interrogation, where he referred to Neely as a "crackhead" and told detectives, "You know these guys, they’re pushing people in front of trains and stuff."

 

"We’ve all spoken dismissively about people like Jordan Neely," she said. "Maybe we, too, have lumped them all together like this, but the context is very telling here. When the defendant is talking like this about Mr. Neely, he knows he very likely had killed him. Can you imagine a reasonable person speaking like this about a human being that he or she had just killed?"

 

Penny was not told about Neely's death when he voluntarily agreed to speak with NYPD detectives.

 

Yoran used similar language earlier in the trial during her opening statement, and her team also allowed witnesses to describe Penny as "the White man" and a "murderer," prompting Penny's defense lawyers to object and ask the court to declare a mistrial over the language.

 

Saying Penny didn't see the humanity in Neely unfairly invoked race, according to his defense, and combined with the other language, it would make it impossible to get a fair trial. The judge denied that earlier motion to declare a mistrial.

 

During the defense's closing arguments Monday, which came before Yoran's remarks, Penny's defense attorney, Steven Raiser, argued that the 26-year-old architecture student stepped in after the city of New York failed passengers on the subway car when Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man high on drugs and suffering from schizophrenia, barged in and started threatening riders.

 

"The government wasn't there. The police weren't there. Danny was," Raiser told the jury. "And when he needed help no one was there. The government has the nerve to blame Danny because police weren't there? Blame Danny for holding on when police weren't there?"

 

It took seven minutes for police to respond to the 911 call and 20 minutes before medics arrived, he said. Neely was "on a collision course with himself," and a "broken system" failed everyone involved, the lawyer said.

 

Penny is on trial facing charges of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide.

 

Neely had a lengthy arrest record, a documented history of severe mental illness, a drug abuse problem and an active arrest warrant when he boarded the F train car on May 1, 2023, and started screaming death threats, trial testimony revealed over the past three weeks.

 

Raiser noted that Penny used "a less aggressive" restraint than what he'd been taught in the Marine Corps, arguing he intended to hold Neely down but not hurt him.

 

"What Danny did was not textbook," he said. "He applied what he learned as a Marine in a less aggressive manner … because the softer side of Danny informed him to apply something less than a textbook Marine blood choke, by choosing not to squeeze Neely to unconsciousness."

 

Penny repeatedly eased up when Neely stopped struggling and only squeezed to hold him down when he started trying to break free, Raiser said.

 

"When you have doubt that Penny squeezed Neely to the point of a chokehold death, you need to look for another cause of death," he said, noting how defense expert Dr. Satish Chundru testified that he believed Neely had died from a combination of his use of the synthetic drug K2, his sickle cell genetic disorder, psychosis and exertion from the struggle.

 

"Danny could not foresee a sickling death," the lawyer said. "So he is not guilty."

 

Chundru's testimony contradicted the official autopsy findings of Dr. Cynthia Harris of the New York City medical examiner's office who blamed Neely's death solely on the chokehold after watching video of the altercation before toxicology results had come back.

 

The defense also replayed bodycam video of responding officers, with one of them repeatedly saying Neely was still breathing.

 

Raiser painted a scene for the jury: The F train pulled into a station and the "tall and muscular" Neely stepped on board, shouting erratically, high on drugs. Neely had schizophrenia and a severe case of paranoia and psychosis, he said. The former Michael Jackson impersonator hallucinated conversations with the late rapper Tupac Shakur and thought he heard the devil's voice. Neely stormed onto the train, threw his jacket on the floor and declared that he didn't care if he died or wound up in prison, allegedly threatening to "kill a motherf—er."

 

"Will it be me? Will it be my children?" Raiser asked. "Everyone was frozen with fear."

 

He went through testimony from multiple female passengers, each of whom described fear and panic. He replayed bodycam footage from officers who spoke with them at the scene. They all had the same thing in common, he added.

 

"Daniel Penny is the one to protect them," he said. "Why? Because he had something unique to him: his training. When Danny acted, he didn't know if Jordan was armed."

 

Some of those passengers braved protesters outside the courthouse to repay the favor, risking their own safety to testify at trial, he added.

 

He played 911 calls: early reports of a knife or gun, confusion and a delayed police response.

 

Penny waited until officers arrived, he said, then spoke with them willingly without a lawyer present, unaware that Neely had even died.

 

Yoran gave a closing on behalf of the prosecution.

 

"No one had to die on May 1, 2023," she said. "Jordan Neely did enter the subway car in an extremely threatening manner … so much less physical force would have done the job … Daniel Penny easily could have restrained Neely without choking him to death. We are here today because the defendant used way too much force for way too long in way too reckless of a manner."

 

Yoran argued that Penny could have let go when bystanders asked him to, replaying video of the incident repeatedly, some of it hard to hear in court.

 

She alleged that Penny knew Neely was "likely" dead but didn't care when he remained at the scene and voluntarily spoke with police officers. They didn't tell him Neely was dead, and they didn't arrest him. He surrendered 11 days later after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office secured a grand jury indictment against him.

 

If jurors don't reach a consensus by the end of the day Tuesday, Judge Maxwell Wiley asked them to return Wednesday to continue deliberations. Since the start of the trial, the court had been in recess on Wednesdays.

 

Penny faces a maximum of 15 years in prison if convicted of the top charge of manslaughter. He is also accused of criminally negligent homicide.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/daniel-penny-prosecutor-dangles-race-card-again-over-defense-objection-despite-no-hate-crime-charges

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:16 p.m. No.22103224   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3227 >>3229 >>3328 >>3413

Judicial Watch: Court Finds Fani Willis in Default in Open Records Lawsuit, Orders Her to Produce Records in Five Business Days

 

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the Superior Court in Fulton County entered an order granting a motion for default judgment against District Attorney Fani Willis in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit for communications Willis had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. In doing so, the court grants Judicial Watch’s request for attorneys’ fees and orders Willis to search for and provide releasable records to Judicial Watch within five business days.

 

The March 2024 lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County, GA, after Willis and the county denied having any records responsive to an August 2023 Georgia Open Records Act (ORA) request for communications with the Special Counsel’s office and/or the January 6 Committee (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No. 24-CV-002805)).

 

In its lawsuit Judicial Watch stated that Willis’ “representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false.” Judicial Watch referred to a December 5, 2023, letter from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to Willis that cites a December 2021 letter from Willis to then-House January 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS). In that letter Willis requested assistance from the committee and offered to travel to DC.

 

In May 2024, Judicial Watch asked the court to declare a default judgment, noting that Willis was served with the lawsuit in March 2024 and had “not filed an answer,” which “was due 30 days after service.”

 

The recently issued default judgment states: “The Court finds Defendant [Willis, in her official capacity] is in default and has been since 11 April 2024.” Further, Willis “never moved to open default on any basis (not even during the period when she could have opened default as a matter of right), she never paid costs, and she never offered up a meritorious defense.”

 

Plaintiff is thus entitled to judgment by default as if every item and paragraph of the complaint were supported by proper and sufficient evidence. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-55(a). Here, this means Plaintiff has established that Defendant violated the ORA by failing to either turn over responsive records or else notify Plaintiff of her decision to withhold some or all such records.

 

In its complaint, Plaintiff sought the following relief:

 

1) a declaration that Defendant has violated the ORA;

 

2) an order for Defendant to search for all records responsive to Plaintiff’s request without further delay;

 

3) an injunction ordering Defendant to cease withholding non-exempt public records responsive to the request;

 

4) an award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-73(b);

 

5) a writ of mandamus, ordering Defendant to provide the requested records; and

 

6) any other relief the Court deems proper.

 

By finding Defendant in default, the Court has in effect declared that she has violated the ORA. The Court also hereby ORDERS Defendant to conduct a diligent search of her records for responsive materials within five business days of the entry of this Order. Within that same five day period, Defendant is ORDERED to provide Plaintiff with copies of all responsive records that are not legally exempted or excepted from disclosure. If Defendant is required or decides to withhold all or part of a requested record, she should follow the procedures set forth in the ORA (see O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(d)). If the records are stored electronically, they may be produced electronically in a commonly used format such as PDF. The Court expects that such production will include the correspondence identified by Plaintiff in its complaint. If it does not, Defendant is further ORDERED to provide an explanation why such correspondence does not exist in Defendant’s records (or why it is being withheld). Beyond that, no other relief, injunctive or otherwise, is necessary at this time (to include striking Defendant’s answer, which is of no effect based on the Court’s finding of default).

 

The court set a hearing on the Judicial Watch’s attorneys fees award for December 20.

 

“Fani Willis is something else. We’ve been doing this work for 30 years, and this is the first time in our experience a government official has been found in default for not showing up in court to answer an open records lawsuit.,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Judicial Watch looks forward to getting any documents from the Fani Willis operation about collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”

 

Judicial Watch is assisted in the case by John Monroe of John Monroe Law in Georgia.

 

Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:

 

In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.

 

(Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.)

 

In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

 

In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing.

 

Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.

 

In his new book Rights and Freedoms in Peril Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton details a long chain of abuses officials and politicians have made against the American people and calls readers to battle for “the soul and survival of America.”

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/fani-willis-in-default/

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:49 p.m. No.22103367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3413

Biden announces $1 billion gift to Africa to help the homeless displaced by non-existent climate change

 

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1864053068452495423

Anonymous ID: 19f00a Dec. 3, 2024, 7:54 p.m. No.22103385   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3413

Photos: See inside the Bidens' last White House Christmas

 

https://www.npr.org/sections/the-picture-show/2024/12/02/g-s1-36441/photos-biden-white-house-christmas-decorations