following this thread by Inner City Press as well as yesterdays, it looks like there is at least 1 hold out to convict Daniel Penny. All of the requests to review evidence have in common they are not favorable to prosecution. It looks like they are trying to use the evidence to convince 1 juror. Seeing as though there is not rhetorical requests for evidence to support a guilty verdict, I would venture a guess it is only 1 asshole juror. This looks like a 1 sided convincing. Making the hold out just stubborn with no real argument
https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1864406775983657410