Anonymous ID: 0088f4 Dec. 6, 2024, 2:29 p.m. No.22120488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0516 >>0521 >>0662 >>0755 >>0805 >>0908 >>1010

At what point does this become illegal activity?

 

On Pardons, Biden Weighs Flexing Presidential Powers in Broad New Ways

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/biden-pardons-retribution-trump-hunter-cheney-fauci/2024/12/06/id/1190684/

 

President Joe Biden faces a stark choice as he contemplates broad preemptive pardons to protect aides and allies from potential retribution by Donald Trump: Does he hew to the institutional norms he’s spent decades defending or flex the powers of the presidency in untested ways.

 

The deliberations so far are largely at the level of White House lawyers.

 

But Biden himself has discussed the topic with senior aides, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive subject.

 

No decisions have been made, the people said, and it is possible Biden opts to do nothing at all.

 

Pardons are historically afforded to those accused of specific crimes –- and usually to those who have already been convicted of an offense — but Biden’s team is considering issuing them preeemptively, for some who have not even been investigated, let alone charged.

 

The president could, if he chose, issue blanket pardons to specific people whom Trump and his allies have talked of punishing. Or he could pardon a broad class of people — not unlike pardons issued to those convicted of federal marijuana offenses or those ensnared in the “don't ask, don't tell” military policies.

 

Either way, he'd be using the powers of the presidency in a new way.

 

Some worry that Trump and his allies, some of whom have talked of enemies lists and exacting “retribution” for their actions toward the first Trump administration, could launch investigations that would be reputationally and financially costly for targeted people even if they don’t result in prosecutions.

 

The door has already been opened, given that Biden has extended a broad pardon to his son, Hunter, who was convicted and pleaded guilty in tax and gun cases. Biden explained that decision by saying he believed the prosecution of his son had been poisoned by politics.

 

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has said Biden plans additional pardons before leaving office though she would not elaborate on the process. She repeatedly referenced “changing factors” that motivated the president to pardon his son despite promising he wouldn’t. She claimed Republicans have continued to try to see Hunter Biden investigated for an array of alleged offenses, a rationale that could be used to support additional pardons for Biden aides and allies.

 

It was two weeks ago that one of the president’s closest allies in Congress, Rep, Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, encouraged Biden to pardon his son Hunter. The morning after that conversation, Clyburn told Biden’s staff that he believed the president should also pardon those being targeted by Trump.

 

“I was very forceful in my discussions with him about what I thought he ought to do regarding his son,” Clyburn said Friday. “But I also told them that I thought he ought to go even further, because all the noise about Jack Smith and Liz Cheney and Doctor Fauci and all of that.”

 

Special Counsel Jack Smith has been investigating Trump for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and for accusations he hoarded classified documents at his home. Liz Cheney, a conservative Republican, was the vice chairwoman of the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach and campaigned for Vice President Kamala Harris. Fauci, an infectious disease expert, was instrumental in the government's response to the coronavirus, which has been widely criticized as overblown and unnecessarily invasive by Trump and allies.

 

Clyburn said he told Biden’s team, only half jokingly, that because the Supreme Court has already said that the president has certain immunities, “let’s give that same immunity to Jack Smith for carrying out his duties and to, Doctor Fauci, Liz Cheney, they were carrying out their duties.”

 

Among those mentioned publicly for possible presidential pardons, there are different sentiments on whether pardons would even be wanted.

 

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi supported the president’s move to pardon his son, but has been silent on the speculation that Biden is considering additional pardons for her or others.

 

A top Pelosi ally, Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic congressman who led Trump’s first impeachment, has panned the idea of pardoning Biden's allies. He says “the courts are strong enough to withstand” the worst of Trump’s threats.

 

“I don’t think a preemptive pardon makes sense,” the senator told NPR recently.

 

“I would urge the president not to do that. I think it would seem defensive and unnecessary,” Schiff said.

Anonymous ID: 0088f4 Dec. 6, 2024, 2:32 p.m. No.22120503   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0516 >>0556 >>0662 >>0755 >>0805 >>0908 >>1010

Looks like Gabbard is next!

 

Fmr National Security Officials 'Alarmed' by Gabbard for DNI

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/dni-trump-cabinet/2024/12/06/id/1190673/

 

Nearly 100 former national security officials signed a letter expressing alarm over President-elect Donald Trump's pick of Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence.

 

The letter, first surfaced by Foreign Policy for America on Wednesday, urged incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to hold closed committee sessions to review "all information available to the U.S. government" regarding Gabbard.

 

"Several of Ms. Gabbard's past actions call into question her ability to deliver unbiased intelligence briefings to the President, Congress, and to the entire national security apparatus," the letter stated.

 

The former officials, led by Wendy Sherman, former deputy secretary of state under President Joe Biden, said they were "alarmed" by the selection of the former Hawaii Democrat lawmaker given Gabbard's previous statements in support of Syria and against Ukraine.

 

"[Syrian President Bashar al-]Assad is not the enemy of the United States because Syria does not pose a direct threat to the United States," Gabbard said in 2019. Her trip to Syria in 2017 to meet with Assad drew bipartisan criticism after she expressed "skepticism" that Assad was behind a chemical attack that killed dozens of Syrians.

 

Three days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Gabbard took to social media to say, "It's time to put geopolitics aside and embrace the spirit of aloha, respect, and love for the Ukrainian people by coming to an agreement that Ukraine will be a neutral country — i.e., no military alliance with NATO or Russia."

 

"Her sympathy for dictators like Vladimir Putin and Assad raises questions about her judgment and fitness," the letter added.

 

Further, the former officials knocked Gabbard for being the "least experienced" person to hold the job since its inception in 2005, given she'd oversee 18 agencies, including the CIA and FBI.

 

"The Senate must carefully evaluate whether Ms. Gabbard is equipped to effectively oversee an organizational structure as unique and large as the National Intelligence Program and also the effect of her holding this position on the willingness of our closest allies to share intelligence with the U.S.," the letter said.

 

The letter said it represented officials who served in Democrat and Republican administrations, including Ian Kelly, who was ambassador to Georgia during the Obama and Trump administrations.

 

"This is a perfect example of why President Trump chose Tulsi Gabbard for this position. These unfounded attacks are from the same geniuses who have blood on their hands from decades of faulty 'intelligence,' including the nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. These intel officials continue to use classification as a partisan weapon to smear and imply things about their political enemy without putting the facts out," Trump transition spokesperson Alexa Henning said in a statement picked up by multiple media outlets.

Anonymous ID: 0088f4 Dec. 6, 2024, 2:56 p.m. No.22120610   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0662 >>0686 >>0755 >>0805 >>0908 >>1010

BRING BACK GAETZ!!!

 

House Republicans Twice Block Release Of Gaetz Ethics Report

https://conservativebrief.com/house-of-87730/

 

On Thursday, House Republicans twice blocked the release of a potentially damaging report from the House Committee on Ethics regarding former Rep. Matt Gaetz, effectively burying allegations of sexual misconduct and drug abuse that had partially derailed his attempt to be confirmed as President-elect Donald Trump’s attorney general.

 

In quick succession, the House voted along near party lines, with votes of 206-198 and 204-198, sending the matter back to the Ethics panel. Rep. Tom McClintock of California was the only Republican to break ranks, voting with Democrats to push for the public release of the scandal, the New York Post reported.

 

Reps. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) and Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) introduced competing measures on Tuesday as privileged resolutions, which necessitate a vote within two legislative days. Casten’s resolution called for the release of the report, while Cohen’s resolution demanded both the release and preservation of the documents.

 

“Resigning from Congress should not allow Members to avoid accountability for allegations as serious as those faced by Matt Gaetz. The Ethics Committee has often released reports on former Members,” Casten argued.

 

Interest in the House Committee on Ethics’ long-anticipated investigation into sex trafficking allegations against Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz intensified last month after President-elect Donald Trump selected him as his nominee for U.S. attorney general.

 

However, Gaetz ultimately withdrew from consideration after it became clear he would face a difficult Senate confirmation process. Trump then announced former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi (R) as his new pick for the position.

 

Before Congress’ break for Thanksgiving, the Ethics Committee convened for a vote but chose not to release the report, despite objections from Democratic members of the bipartisan panel, The Post noted.

 

Although the committee did not confirm what they were voting on, Chairman Michael Guest (R-Miss.) and ranking member Susan Wild (D-Pa.) strongly indicated that they were considering the potential release of the report, the outlet continued.

 

The House Committee on Ethics met again Thursday ahead of the vote on Casten’s resolution but did not release the report or provide specific details about the meeting, The Post said.

 

The report continued:

 

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) had publicly opposed the release of the report and after Gaetz dropped out of consideration for the AG post, momentum to do so seemingly lost steam.

 

Witnesses had allegedly come forward to the committee with accusations that Gaetz paid for sex with two women and had sex with a then-17-year-old over seven years ago, according to multiple attorneys.

 

Gaetz has strenuously denied wrongdoing. He had roiled many of his Republican and Democratic colleagues in Congress alike last year by spearheading the effort to oust former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.)

 

Accusers had alleged that Gaetz sent Venmo payments in exchange for sex. The intercourse with the then-minor allegedly took place at a party in July 2017.

 

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has opposed releasing the report.

 

“Someone who is no longer a member of Congress, we are not in the business of investigating and publishing a report of people who are not a part of this institution,” the speaker told reporters Friday. “The ethics committee’s jurisdiction is for sitting members of Congress.”

 

One of the accusers alleged that they witnessed Gaetz in the act with the minor, according to Orlando-based attorney Joel Leppard, who represents the two accusers who were not minors at the time.

 

Leppard said that the witness said “her understanding was that Gaetz did not know that [the 17-year-old] was a minor, and that when he learned that she was a minor, that he broke off things and did not continue a sexual relationship until she turned 18,” ABC News reported.

 

The Justice Department under President Joe Biden investigated the claims against Gaetz but did not find evidence to charge him.