Anonymous ID: 98f332 Dec. 7, 2024, 6:58 p.m. No.22127159   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7217

It’s Time for Harvard Students To Pick Up a Book

When was the last time you read a book cover to cover?

 

For me, a prospective English concentrator, it was last week. But ask my peers in other concentrations and you’re more likely to get a shrug.

 

Harvard students complain about readings constantly.They lament any assignments requiring they conquer more than twenty-five pages as tedious or overwhelming(if they aren’t passing the work off to ChatGPT).It’s far too rare that we’re assigned a full bookto read and rarer still that we actually finish them.

 

Literature is worryingly absent from many Harvard students’ course of study. My proposal?The College should instate a new requirement: an English course.

 

Though it’s true that the College requires all students to engage with the liberal arts through the Arts and Humanities and Expository Writing requirements,literature courses have fallen by the wayside. It’s entirely conceivable that students could graduate Harvard College without having read a book of fiction in full.

 

Case in point: A number of Expository Writing courses don’t require students to read whole novels. The same is true for many classes that satisfy the Arts and Humanities requirement. Courses like these are still deeply valuable, but they cannot replace the study of literature.

 

No other medium offers the opportunity to engage deliberately with moral ambiguity quite like literature. Fiction allows us to stop and recognize a problem where we might not have otherwise. It requires that readers attempt to understand uncomfortable truths and sympathetic villains.

 

Through reading fiction, students find their own answers to these questions. As such,our aversion to literature results in a collective inability to engage in challenging conversations and disagreements— and puts at risk the University’s new favorite project of “intellectual vitality.”

 

Taking an English class at Harvard doesn’t just expand your perspective — it’s also enjoyable. The courses are personal; professors encourage their students to ask questions and disagree with them. Unlike my typical Harvard section which seems to always be filled with disengaged students obsessively checking the clock as they count down the minutes until they can race out the door, my English section is ripe with thought-provoking conversations.

 

Some argue, rightly, that the decline in reading books stems from inadequate reading requirements in high schoolrather than college curricular shortcomings. But it is exactly for this reason that Harvard has an obligation to its students to reinvigorate their respect for literature.

 

The current Quantitative Reasoning with Data requirement offers a model for a potential English requirement. To fulfill the QRD, students can take anything from ASTRON 2: “Celestial Navigation” to ECON 1123: “Introduction to Econometrics.”

 

Similarly, a required English class would not need to be one-size-fits-all — Harvard could create literary offerings targeted to those interested in medicine, law, math, or history to ensure the requirement is engaging for students who may not have signed up for a traditional English course otherwise.

 

Classes that fulfill the requirement need not overwhelm students with a book every week like Humanities 10: “A Humanities Colloquium.” Assigning a few novels and teaching them well is all it takes to cultivate an appreciation for literature.

 

And yes, I am well aware of the fact that many people don’t like reading — and that a required course may not change their minds.It’s perfectly acceptable to not enjoy reading, just as I don’t find joy in doing three problem sets a week for a calculus class.

 

However, education is not about simply liking what you’re learning;requirements give us a necessary well-rounded education. Through this course, more Harvard students would begin to see the merits of both reading and humanities, and perhaps might open to reading a book for pleasure in the future.

 

Every night, my friends and I sprawl across the couches of the Cabot Science Library. While I read whatever novel was assigned to me that week, they look over jealously, remarking on how cool it is that I have actual books in my backpack.

 

Reading physical books shouldn’t feel so foreign to Harvard students. An English requirement would go a long way to change that.

 

(So 1984 (?) was right, books will disappear, but they weren't collected, they were thrown out by the lazy.)

 

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/12/5/miller-harvard-books-course-requirements/

Anonymous ID: 98f332 Dec. 7, 2024, 7:19 p.m. No.22127287   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7302

Alpha DominationKek

 

Margo Martin

@margomartin

 

President Zelenskyy arrives at Élysée Palace to meet with President Trump and President Macron

 

11:40 AM · Dec 7, 2024

·814.2K Views

 

https://x.com/margomartin/status/1865436290344173616

 

0:12

Anonymous ID: 98f332 Dec. 7, 2024, 7:27 p.m. No.22127317   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Blake Masters under consideration to become Trump’s top gun regulator

Fri, December 6, 2024 at 4:45 PM EST

 

The Scoop

 

Blake Masters is under consideration to head up the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosivesfor President-elect Donald Trump.

 

Masters met with the incoming president’s transition team on Thursday and is interested in helming the regulatory agency, two people familiar with the situation told Semafor. He lost two races for Congress in Arizona, this past fall and in 2022, while running as a Trump loyalist.

 

Masters was previously vying to lead the Presidential Personnel Office, as Semafor first reported. That low-profile, influential role focused on administration hiring ultimately went to Sergio Gor, the president and co-founder of Donald Trump Jr.’s publishing company.

 

Masters did not respond to a request for comment. A transition spokesperson declined to comment.

 

Know More

 

Masters’ unwavering pro-Trump stance could help him win the role; similar allegiance helped Republicans like former Sen. David Perdue and former Rep. Billy Long snag top nominations this month. Trump endorsed Masters in the 2022 Senate race, though he went on to lose the general election to Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.

 

He lost a House primary this year to Abe Hamadeh, though he did win a late co-endorsement from Trump. Masters is also aligned with Vice President-elect JD Vance and billionaire Peter Thiel, but also has some enemies inside Trump’s camp who will likely push back on giving him any key role.

 

If Masters does get the nod, he won’t have an easy path in the Senate — simply due to the history of the ATF director position, which involves oversight of politically sensitive gun policies. President Joe Biden pulled his first ATF nominee, David Chipman, before his second nominee, Steve Dettelbach, was confirmed in 2022.

 

Even that’s something of an accomplishment; Trump’s ATF nominee Chuck Canterbury was withdrawn in 2020, and Dettelbach was only the second ATF director ever confirmed by the Senate.

 

Masters may appeal to pro-gun Republicans, though, having campaigned as a pro-gun Senate candidate – with video proof. Republicans can afford up to three defections on any nominee.

 

Brandon Herrera, a gun advocate who narrowly lost a GOP primary race against Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales earlier this year, is also interested in the ATF position. He said last month he would “hack, slash, and cripple that agency in ways it could never recover from” if confirmed to the job.

 

(https://www.yahoo.com/news/blake-masters-under-consideration-become-214541279.html

 

Why would a gun supporter not be considered for ATF?

 

Hey, what is Kari being considered for?