Anonymous ID: cdd9f2 Dec. 8, 2024, 2:44 p.m. No.22131684   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22131658

Liberal minds being manipulated and deceived over and over again.

 

Protest, protest, protest โ€ฆโ€ฆ take, take, take

rinse and repeat

Liberals are locusts, they consume and add nothing real to their communities

Anonymous ID: cdd9f2 Dec. 8, 2024, 3:04 p.m. No.22131785   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1802 >>1814 >>2141

>>22131754

2 Esdras

 

Iโ€™m familiar with II Esdras 13:40-45

This text indicates that a large body of Israelites escaped the Assyrian captivity and settled in a new land after they were exiled from the Promised Land. If they had journeyed to the New World, the account in II Esdras would have mentioned a vast fleet of ships as they could not go overland to the New World. No such fleet is mentioned. When verse 41 states they went to a โ€œmore distant region,โ€ it means they went to a region โ€œmore distantโ€ from Assyria, but it says nothing that they crossed an ocean to get there. Indeed, the account tells us the direction they fled. It states that God โ€œheld back the sourcesโ€ of the Euphrates River so they could travel to their new region of habitation. They were traveling northward out of the Promised Land when they crossed the Euphrates River (not westward toward the New World). Verse 45 relates they arrived in โ€œArzarethโ€ after a 1 and 1/2 year journey. Arzareth is associated with the Black Sea region of the Asian continent. It could easily take them that long to travel to a new region and get established given that they were traveling with millions of people, especially when you include the elderly, the young, their flocks and herds, etc. Abundant evidence supports the conclusion that the Sacae Scythians were descended from these very Israelites who escaped the Assyrian captivity and migrated into the Black Sea region.