Diluted Representation: Annexing Canada and Mexico

(lb) >>22131491

>Trump - If we are going to subsidize Canada ($100B) and Mexico ($300B) let them become a state

each state's number of representatives is determined by the state's population

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/number-of-representatives-by-state

How many people in Kentucky, for example?

As of 2023, the population of Kentucky is approximately 4.5 million people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Kentucky

more than 40 million Canadians as of 2024

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_of_Canada

The current population of Mexico is 131,332,093 as of Saturday, December 7, 2024

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/mexico-population/

131.000,000 (Mexico)

/ 4,500,000 (Kentucky)

= 29

So Mexico would have 29 times the number of Congressional Reps than Kentucky?

The US Federal Gov’t, that needs to be down-sized with power given back to We The People, where would its attention and resources be shifted to?

South and North of the border?

How COULD Canada and Mexico become States without causing political turmoil?

What could Canada and Mexico do so they’re not in a position of needing subsidies?

If globalist feet are removed from necks, could America, Canada, and Mexico all have economic booms?

>>22132881

True.

But getting rid of the subsidies isn't a non-starter idea.

And this statement comes to mind:

What the Committee of 300 has in mind for Mexico is a feudal peasantry, a condition that allows for easy management and looting of Mexican oil. A stable and prosperous Mexico can only be a plus for the United States. This is what the conspirators wish to prevent, so they have engaged in decades of innuendo, slander and direct economic war on Mexico.

https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf