Anonymous ID: bb5644 Dec. 9, 2024, 5:25 a.m. No.22134735   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4738 >>4807 >>4952 >>5002

Morning folks.

May have a little Q proof here. Just listening to this video now, a discussion with Matlock. Oldfags of Q will remember that name.

Here are the two Qposts that mention him. Maybe it's his time?

Anonymous ID: bb5644 Dec. 9, 2024, 5:59 a.m. No.22134818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4830 >>4838 >>4856 >>4899

>>22134807

Thank you anon for this. You might want to read this article here, from Matlock's own website.

He doesn't have any confidence in Trump managing policy - foreign or domestic, because of the essential nature of American psychology, American exceptionalism. That needs addressing.

I'd agree. Trump plays to the crowd. He's an entertainer first because that's essentially what 'muricans insist on.

https://jackmatlock.com/2024/11/dilemmas-by-michael-brenner/

But there's always the chance that Trump's playacting is just a cover - a charade if you like - for deeper actions beneath/behind the surface. That's fine, but it does nothing to encourage a deeper look by Americans into the more profound aspects of what America should be about. He's really done nothing to educate people or stir a desire to learn more.

Outside of the Q movement. And look how that's largely degenerated here.

Anonymous ID: bb5644 Dec. 9, 2024, 6:07 a.m. No.22134842   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4857

>>22134830

I don't mean to be too disparaging. I rarely come here anymore, since April 2020. I work on /pol/ mostly.

There are good notables here, but in-depth analysis, filtered through Q posts, is something that really requires having been with Q from the beginning.

I've only come here when there was something specific on a Q post that related to a current event. Q's posts keep playing out, they're future-oriented and obscure.

I miss the clockmaker too, though I barely understood him!