anons.

in the spirit of Q-1643.

in the spirit of 'forcing' this one.

i present to you my attempt to show that

IF Q is not real

THEN Q is committing a crime

AND

THEREFORE we must insist that the media/government pay attention to Q.

IF Q is real

THEN Q asked for the ultimate question.

AND I still believe the ultimate question is:

WHO IS Q?

I trust myself.

I trust my judgement.

I trust that I am acting in good faith to further this movement.

I believe that Q crumbs are legit, and while proof is difficult, I believe that the seven highlighted statements contained within this graphic show a clear attempt to impress upon us that our comms are coming from within an officer or employee acting under the authority of the president.

>>2213947

>>2213955

literally the exact opposite of what he's saying.

>>2213959

good.

logic needs testing.

I don't want to be misled, but I want to help Q.

Q said they want "the question asked" of POTUS.

Q has asserted presidential authorization.

>>2214062

>>2214048

FORCE IT.

IF Q IS A LARP.

Q IS ILLEGAL.

FORCE IT.

(updated graphic)

>>2214167

>>2214173

i appreciate that this proves to US who Q is.

but i have spoken directly with 4 journalists of varying "importance", and they all say the same thing.

this isn't proof, it's not definitive.

to us, to the detail noticers, to the dot connectors, the tippy-top and plane-window "proof" makes sense.

but to the rest of the world? nah.

to journalists who want hard evidence? nah.

we need them to prove a negative.

prove that Q is NOT a criminal. force them into the corner. force them to ask if this is a hoax. force them to ask how Q can assert presidential authority.

>>2214219

it doesn't matter what i know about flight restrictions.

Q wants a reporter to ask the ultimate question. if you are sure about the flight-path-proof, push the hell out of it.

my interactions with journalists have shown me that they aren't interested in this style of "proof".

>>2214226

good feedback, thank you.

i will look for a more direct statement to tie these terms together.

>>2214226

updated with assertions that POTUS = DJT = President = We = Q.