Dr. Kevin McKernan discusses DNA contamination in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines:
"The most interesting thing about those FOIA requests and those emails is that the communication they're giving to the public doesn't line up with the communication they have internally."
"So we've seen them go on record saying the DNA is of too little concentration to matter, yet they're asking Pfizer for their protocols to measure this. So they asked for their QPCR protocols. So which is it? Is it too low to matter or have you not measured it? It sounds like they haven't measured it."
"The other set of details in that email is they asked Pfizer to create a fragment length analysis assay, which Pfizer responded saying they don't currently have one and they're going to have to develop it and it's going to take some time. I think they gave them to December 1st of 2023 to sort that out. Well, that's very different than what they've communicated publicly, which is that these Fragments are all under 200 bases."
"So how do they know that if Pfizer themselves doesn't even have an assay to assess that? What is this SP40 promoter and is it relevant? And Pfizer's communication back has been it's not a material part of the plasmid for manufacturing. That's really disingenuous or an overt lie because you can go through their EMA documents and see that they're in fact using kanamycin at, I think it was 50 micrograms per ml."
"So if they're using kanamycin, which… makes complete sense that they would. The plasmid has a kanamycin selectable marker. So you can't get that plasmid to replicate in a coli without kanamycin present. And you need the promoter to do it. So without the SP40 promoter, they get no plasmid manufacturing. So they're trying to play this game claiming it's immaterial. Don't worry about it. Don't look over here."
"When in fact, if you go through their EMA documents, you can see, and as anyone who understands how plasmids work, you can't get them to replicate Nicolai without the antibiotic resistance gene, and you need its promoter in order for that gene to be turned on. We have two things going on here. We have spike protein that is down regulating expression of P53, and we know we have SV40 promoter's DNA in there that is also interacting with that pathway."
"This all needs to get untangled and better understood. The right thing would be to just get all that DNA out of there, but the second thing is you won't have a clean vaccine when that's done. If the spike protein does what it does, it's been reported to do, they need a different antigen, or they need to reconsider whether these respiratory viruses actually are addressable with injectable vaccines."
"The take-home lesson that I've read from reading those emails is thatthe regulators seem to be working hand-in-hand with Pfizer to help pave their excuse path, if you will. as opposed to asking them very adversarial questions over this contamination. It is clear from those emails that they were not informed of SV40 being in there. They discovered this upon our publication."
"They were given the sequence, but nobody took the five to 10 minutes it would take to pop that sequence into SnapGene and see the omission. So they had the sequence in hand. They filed it away and never looked at it until… someone in the public showed them that, hey, there's something in there that no one consented to. And that particular sequence is all through the literature."
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1866108458098905464