Anonymous ID: 80cd8d Dec. 9, 2024, 11:15 a.m. No.22136412   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6464

WATCH: NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch says investigators believe the person of interest in CEO murder was carrying the murder weapon and the mask he used during the crime, as well as fake IDs & a passport

 

https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1866197156367056957

Anonymous ID: 80cd8d Dec. 9, 2024, 11:59 a.m. No.22136627   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6633 >>6856

>>22136126

BLM AFTER PENNY VERDICT: "These wonderful white people, I hope they celebrate their Christmas while the Neely family is praying & asking God for comfort. G-d damn them & G-d damn America"

 

https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1866205373608124533

Anonymous ID: 80cd8d Dec. 9, 2024, 12:01 p.m. No.22136632   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6636 >>6817 >>6831 >>6854

>>22136218

NEW: Quotes from Luigi Mangione's manifesto say he 'acted alone' & was 'self-funded'

 

“These parasites had it coming” & “I do apologize for any strife and trauma, but it had to be done.”

 

(via CNN)

 

https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1866199334540435795

Anonymous ID: 80cd8d Dec. 9, 2024, 12:11 p.m. No.22136666   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6697 >>6738

Remember when they tried to turn one of the Boston Marathon bombers into a heartthrob idol?

 

Wait until you see what they do with this Mangione guy.

 

https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1866200807546499430

Anonymous ID: 80cd8d Dec. 9, 2024, 12:25 p.m. No.22136716   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6750 >>6793

>>22136242

Hawk Newsome, the unhinged BLM activist who is trying to incite violence right now, gave a Ted talk in 2018.

 

"Do you believe in the Bible?… Help your neighbor."

 

Hey Hawk, that's exactly what Daniel Penny was doing.

 

https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1866206758533767629

Anonymous ID: 80cd8d Dec. 9, 2024, 12:32 p.m. No.22136743   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6749 >>6776 >>6793

>>22136735

Today the Supreme Court denied the cert petition of a coalition of parents challenging the constitutionality of an Eau Claire, Wisconsin school district policy that hides the gender identity information of minor children from their parents.

 

This is the second denial of a case involving such policies this SCOTUS term.

 

My take: the justices have stomached enough gender identity analysis this term with U.S. v Skrmetti.

 

It very well could also have been an assessment on the petitioners’ lack of standing (i.e., a concrete injury that can be redressed by a court). The parents had advanced a “facial” challenge to the school policy as unconstitutional and all had children in covered schools, but none of the parents had children who identified as transgender. I’d wager it made the majority queasy about a cert grant.

 

Determinations on lack of standing in this kind of litigation have proved fatal to challenges across the country.

 

But in today’s dissent from denial by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Alito, Alito rightly and stridently argued:

 

"IT|he challenged policy and associated equity training specifically encourage school personnel to keep parents in the dark about the identities' of their children, especially if the school believes that the parents would not support what the school thinks is appropriate…Thus, the parents' fear that the school district might make decisions for their children without their knowledge and consent is not 'speculative'…They are merely taking the school district at its word."

 

Alito argued that courts have found a lack of standing "as a way of avoiding some particularly contentious constitutional questions."

 

Parental authority includes the right and solemn responsibility to say no to children's often short-sighted desires when necessary to protect them from themselves. And even now, there is another case currently under consideration in the 11th Circuit that might put the justices to the point on these policies once and for all.

 

https://x.com/SarahPPerry/status/1866171550090875117