Raland Brunson v Alma Adams

Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al. (Docket No. 22-380) is a petition for a writ of certiorari filed with the United States Supreme Court. The case involves a civil action brought by Raland J. Brunson, a pro se plaintiff, against 388 federal officers, including President Joseph Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and former Vice President Michael Pence, as well as numerous members of Congress.

buh-bye 388

————

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Docket No. 22-380) seeks review by the Supreme Court of a lower court decision in the case of Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al. The petition argues that the lower court incorrectly decided an important question of law, and that the mistake should be corrected to prevent confusion in similar cases.

Background

The case involves a civil lawsuit filed by Raland J. Brunson against Alma S. Adams, et al., alleging that government officials failed to uphold their oath of office and swore to uphold the Constitution. The petition asserts that all government officials should be held to the highest standard when taking an oath of office, with no exceptions or immunity.

Arguments

The petition presents several arguments in support of certiorari, including:

National significance: The case raises important questions about the accountability of government officials and the potential consequences of their actions on the public.

Conflict with precedent: The lower court’s decision conflicts with established precedent and may create confusion among lower courts.

Potential for harm: If left unchecked, the lower court’s decision may lead to further erosion of accountability and undermine the public’s trust in government.

Procedural History

The case has undergone several stages of litigation, including:

Trial court: The case was initially heard in the trial court, where Brunson’s claims were dismissed.

Appeal: Brunson appealed the decision to the appellate court, which affirmed the trial court’s ruling.

Petition for certiorari: Brunson has now petitioned the Supreme Court for review, arguing that the lower courts erred in their decisions.

Conclusion

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Docket No. 22-380) presents a compelling case for review by the Supreme Court. The Court’s grant of certiorari would allow it to consider the important questions of law raised by the case and provide guidance on the accountability of government officials.